{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario shows overlapping promotions and losses, but does not establish segmented pricing, buyer differences, or resale/leakage.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R01L01","evidence":"Several campaigns offered discounts, credits, shipping, regional targeting, and eligibility rules, but the scenario does not establish effectively similar offers made at different prices or conditions to segments.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R01L02","evidence":"No evidence describes buyer segments differing in willingness to pay, urgency, eligibility, purchasing power, usage scale, or policy purpose.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R01L03","evidence":"No evidence shows that a lower-priced or restricted offer attracted buyers outside an intended segment.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R01L04","evidence":"No resale, sharing, transfer, bulk purchasing, repackaging, or weak channel boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R02L01","evidence":"Several campaigns offered discounts, credits, shipping, regional targeting, and eligibility rules, but the scenario does not establish effectively similar offers made at different prices or conditions to segments.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R02L02","evidence":"The losses resulted from authorized offers stacking, not described leakage, cannibalization, gray-market redistribution, or account sharing.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C01R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns campaign configuration and financial exposure, not unsolicited pro-social contributions or coordinator attention.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02R01L01","evidence":"No unsolicited pro-social contributions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02R01L02","evidence":"No coordinator's scarce expert attention being required before contribution value can be realized is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02R01L03","evidence":"No social cost of redirecting, deferring, or refusing contributions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02R01L04","evidence":"No interruption-sensitive, delay-sensitive, safety-critical, or near-capacity primary work is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02R01L05","evidence":"No contribution and recipient-support-budget relationship is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No assertion about market prices reflecting an information set is present.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R01L01","evidence":"No prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R01L02","evidence":"No disagreement over what information belongs to an operative market-information set is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R02L01","evidence":"No prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R02L02","evidence":"No disclosure or event price response is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R03L01","evidence":"No prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R03L02","evidence":"No related markets or channels incorporating information at different speeds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R04L01","evidence":"No prices or market signals are asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R04L02","evidence":"No risk-adjusted returns, arbitrage, stale valuation, or post-release underreaction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R05L01","evidence":"No operative no-predictability model based on a specified information set is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R05L02","evidence":"No new market-information feeds, regulations, disclosures, venues, or access arrangements are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C03R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish an ongoing last-party-standing contest with sunk costs and private endurance information.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R01L01","evidence":"No contest for a prize, position, budget, territory, concession, market, precedent, or status outcome is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R01L02","evidence":"No parties are described as paying ongoing waiting costs in a contest.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R01L03","evidence":"No contest costs or their recoverability upon withdrawal are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R01L04","evidence":"No private information about contest endurance, resources, pain tolerance, reservation value, or willingness to concede is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R02L01","evidence":"No ongoing contest or declining contest-prize value is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R02L02","evidence":"No last-party-standing contest with sunk flow costs and uncertain thresholds is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C04R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Campaigns vary by discount and delivery terms, but buyer heterogeneity, identity-discrimination constraints, and enforceable self-selection tiers are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05R01L01","evidence":"No substantial buyer differences in willingness to pay, urgency, support need, flexibility, capacity, or convenience are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05R01L02","evidence":"Campaign forms separately accept discounts, credits, free shipping, regional targeting, and eligibility rules, showing multiple offer dimensions.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05R01L03","evidence":"No evidence addresses whether price discrimination by buyer identity is inappropriate, infeasible, or easy to game.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05R01L04","evidence":"The scenario describes failed combined-exposure controls, not enforceable tier boundaries without excessive friction or unfair denial.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05R01L05","evidence":"No evidence shows buyer groups valuing different nonprice attributes more than the nominal product.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No insider-membership boundary or differential newcomer crossing cost is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C06R01L01","evidence":"No status boundary separating insiders or members from outsiders or nonmembers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C06R01L02","evidence":"No crossing cost involving time, money, paperwork, travel, social exposure, translation, fluency, or repeated effort is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C06R01L03","evidence":"No comparison of insider and newcomer crossing costs is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C06R01L04","evidence":"No observed membership and plausibly qualified population comparison is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a fixed zero-sum resource, strategic anticipation, or an absence of joint-positive paths.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07R01L01","evidence":"No relevant resource, rank, seat, prize, budget share, liability share, or formal right is established as fixed over the decision horizon.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07R01L02","evidence":"No equal mechanical reduction of another actor's outcome from one actor's improvement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07R01L03","evidence":"Managers acted independently, but the scenario does not establish strategic choices made in anticipation of others' choices.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07R01L04","evidence":"No actor is described as hiding losses, relabeling redistribution, or externalizing losses to nonparticipants.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07R01L05","evidence":"No evidence establishes that no joint-positive enlargement path exists within the operative boundary.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Regional targeting and eligibility rules create context differences, but inter-context shifting to exploit them and displaced harm are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08R01L01","evidence":"Campaigns use regional targeting and eligibility rules, so access conditions differ across contexts.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08R01L02","evidence":"No actor is described as moving activity, value, identity, cost, risk, labor, waste, data, or obligation across a boundary.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08R01L03","evidence":"Orders below fulfillment cost caused losses concentrated in two countries, but the scenario does not establish that an exploiting actor shifted harm to affected parties or future states.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08R01L04","evidence":"The authorization checks fail to assess combined exposure, but the scenario does not establish a discrepancy between contexts defeating a stated safeguard or accountability regime.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08R01L05","evidence":"No local compliance failure caused by an exploit residing between contexts is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Field-level authorization checks are described, but not self-interested control of a validation verdict or inaccessible validation evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09R01L01","evidence":"Campaign owners submit promotions and checks approve fields, but no artifact producer is shown to control or benefit from its validation verdict.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09R01L02","evidence":"No affected external parties and their ability to inspect evidence supporting a validity claim are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09R02L01","evidence":"Campaign owners submit promotions and checks approve fields, but no artifact producer is shown to control or benefit from its validation verdict.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09R02L02","evidence":"Four similar overlaps show checks missed combined-exposure defects, but the scenario does not establish prior internal checks or builder signoffs as the relevant validation process.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C09R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario provides no evidence of audience-conditioned responses, social pressure, or online popularity cues affecting judgment.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R01L01","evidence":"No response changing with names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R01L02","evidence":"No observing system is described as treating audience-conditioned responses as stable preferences or context-free evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R02L01","evidence":"No public unanimity, private doubt, reversal, anonymous complaint, or low follow-through is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R03L01","evidence":"No retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward for a response is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R03L02","evidence":"No observing system is described as treating audience-conditioned responses as stable preferences or context-free evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R04L01","evidence":"No online popularity, identity, reaction-count, or durable-history exposure before independent judgment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R04L02","evidence":"No observing system is described as treating audience-conditioned responses as stable preferences or context-free evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C10R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11","confidence":0.96,"reason":"Combined campaign exposure is a checkable decision-relevant property, but the scenario does not establish witnesses, parallel generators, or review capacity spent reconstructing generation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01L01","evidence":"No creative, combinatorial, heuristic, remote, proprietary, or expensive candidate-generation process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01L02","evidence":"Combined financial exposure across overlapping campaigns is decision-relevant and can be evaluated from the campaign configurations and exposure inputs.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01L03","evidence":"No witness, proof, trace, schedule, bound, oracle, or replay record is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01L04","evidence":"No multiple independent generators searching in parallel are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01L05","evidence":"No authoritative acceptance path or comparison with a generation stack is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01L06","evidence":"No scarce review capacity spent repeating generation rather than checking explicit claims is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Field-level-only authorization permits ordinary campaign owners to create overlapping promotions that price orders below fulfillment cost, repeatedly causing concentrated losses.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C12R01L01","evidence":"The authorization envelope permits campaign owners to combine independently approved promotions without a combined-exposure check; stacked offers priced thousands of orders below fulfillment cost and similar overlaps occurred four times this quarter.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C12R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Information is siloed between managers and finance, but the scenario does not establish an informed party's concealment incentives, hidden-risk selection, hidden action after protection, or indistinguishable quality.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13R01L01","evidence":"Managers cannot see others' pending promotions and finance receives totals after settlement, but no one party is established as knowing a material fact another relying party cannot directly observe.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13R01L02","evidence":"No incentive to hide, exaggerate, selectively reveal, or delay a material fact is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13R01L03","evidence":"No pool, market, queue, contract, delegation, or platform is described as attracting hidden high-risk or low-quality participants.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13R01L04","evidence":"Campaign owners had authorized access, but no protected or delegated actor is described as taking hidden action after receiving protection, authority, or access.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13R01L05","evidence":"No inability to distinguish high- from low-quality claims, credentials, products, or commitments is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q00514BB28C50"}