{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01","confidence":0.74,"reason":"The incident is attributed to a currency-table unit error, not concealed redistribution or a demonstrated zero-sum strategic contest.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01R01L01","evidence":"No fixed resource, rank, right, or share over a decision horizon is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01R01L02","evidence":"The scenario does not establish equal-offsetting outcomes between actors.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01R01L03","evidence":"No strategic participant choices in anticipation of others are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01R01L04","evidence":"The ledger shows approved promotions stayed within limits, and the loss is traced to a currency-table error before campaign evaluation.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01R01L05","evidence":"No evidence establishes whether a joint-positive enlargement path exists.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C01R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario describes an operational pricing-loss incident, not a demonstrated waiting contest with sunk costs or private endurance information.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R01L01","evidence":"No contest prize or last-party-standing outcome is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R01L02","evidence":"No ongoing waiting costs by contesting parties are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R01L03","evidence":"No paid costs of withdrawal are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R01L04","evidence":"No private information about willingness to concede or endurance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R02L01","evidence":"No continuing contest or declining contest-prize value is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R02L02","evidence":"No last-party-standing contest, sunk flow costs, or uncertain concession thresholds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C02R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03","confidence":0.91,"reason":"Promotions are described, but not segmented pricing of the same offer with leakage or transferability.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that the same good was offered under different prices or conditions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R01L02","evidence":"No buyer segment differences of the specified kinds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R01L03","evidence":"No outside-segment attraction to a restricted or lower-priced offer is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R01L04","evidence":"No resale, sharing, transfer, bulk purchase, or weak channel boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R02L01","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that the same good was offered under different prices or conditions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R02L02","evidence":"No leakage, cannibalization, gray-market redistribution, or account sharing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C03R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04","confidence":0.96,"reason":"No chunked processing, incremental merge behavior, topology divergence, or hierarchical rollup requirement is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04R01L01","evidence":"No large input processing across chunks, shards, teams, or hierarchy levels is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04R01L02","evidence":"No partial-result merging is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04R01L03","evidence":"No differing deployment topology or worker-count results are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04R01L04","evidence":"No scalar-summary recombination problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04R01L05","evidence":"No reporting hierarchy or raw-record rollup requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C05","confidence":0.84,"reason":"The currency-table import changed a consequential estimate and affected order margins, but irreversibility and time-varying reversal are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C05R01L01","evidence":"The imported currency table changed the landed-cost estimate used before campaign evaluation.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C05R01L02","evidence":"The erroneous estimate affected fulfillment expense and margins on marketplace orders.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C05R01L03","evidence":"No evidence shows reversal cost or restoration fidelity changing over time.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C05R01L04","evidence":"No effect is identified as impossible to restore, compensate, or contain.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C06","confidence":0.83,"reason":"The established promotion constraints held and the loss was traced to a pre-evaluation currency-table error rather than the constraint envelope.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C06R01L01","evidence":"All promotion limits were enforced, offers could be paused, exposure was normal, and the loss arose from the erroneous currency table.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C06R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The incident identifies a data error, not an information-asymmetry setting with hidden types, claims, or post-protection actions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07R01L01","evidence":"No party is described as knowing a material fact unavailable to a relying party.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07R01L02","evidence":"No informed party's incentive to conceal or distort information is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07R01L03","evidence":"No pool, market, queue, contract, delegation, or platform selection of hidden-risk participants is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07R01L04","evidence":"No protected or delegated actor taking hidden action is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07R01L05","evidence":"No inability to distinguish high- from low-quality claims or commitments is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario does not describe a growing option search, sequential choice problem, absent closure rules, or proxy optimization.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L01","evidence":"No expanding option comparison or diminishing decision improvement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L02","evidence":"No inability to know a feasible global optimum is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L03","evidence":"No sequential candidate-arrival decision with delay cost is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L04","evidence":"No use of an unshared “good enough” threshold is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L05","evidence":"No continuing requirements growth is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L06","evidence":"No repeated decision reopening due to absent closure rules is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L07","evidence":"No first-fit rule or order-dependent incumbent advantage is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01L08","evidence":"No optimization of a proxy degrading the listed values is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09","confidence":0.94,"reason":"A timestamped data import is described, but not order-dependent activities, timing windows, feedback delay, or parallel-work races.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09R01L01","evidence":"No evidence shows the same activities producing different outcomes solely because of their order.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09R01L02","evidence":"No readiness or opportunity window opening and closing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09R01L03","evidence":"No subsystem tempo or phase mismatch is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09R01L04","evidence":"No feedback arriving after state change is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09R01L05","evidence":"No parallel-work race or rework is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario provides no buyer-preference segmentation or enforceable product-tier structure.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10R01L01","evidence":"No substantial buyer differences in willingness to pay, urgency, support needs, flexibility, capacity, or convenience are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10R01L02","evidence":"No decomposition of the offer into tiering dimensions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10R01L03","evidence":"No issue with identity-based price discrimination is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10R01L04","evidence":"No enforceable tier boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10R01L05","evidence":"No buyer-group valuation of distinct nonprice attributes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a coordination equilibrium, incompatible conventions, or a convention locked in despite changed conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R01L01","evidence":"No actors are described as privately preferring a common outcome while awaiting assurance from others.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R01L02","evidence":"No costly or unsafe unilateral switching is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R01L03","evidence":"No legacy equilibrium sustained by expectations and switching costs is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R02L01","evidence":"No workable but incompatible conventions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R02L02","evidence":"No need for complementary coordination roles is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R02L03","evidence":"No conflicting announcements or defaults are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R03L01","evidence":"Although a ceiling is established, no evidence shows a convention locked in despite changed conditions.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C11R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No assertion about market-price information efficiency, price response, arbitrage, or information access is made.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R01L01","evidence":"No price or market signal is asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R01L02","evidence":"No disagreement about an operative information set is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R02L01","evidence":"No price or market signal is asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R02L02","evidence":"No disclosure or event-related price response is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R03L01","evidence":"No price or market signal is asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R03L02","evidence":"No related-market information-incorporation speed difference is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R04L01","evidence":"No price or market signal is asserted to reflect a specified information set.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R04L02","evidence":"No risk-adjusted return, arbitrage, stale valuation, or underreaction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R05L01","evidence":"No model assumption about information and risk-adjusted prediction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R05L02","evidence":"No change in market-information access arrangements is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C12R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C13","confidence":0.84,"reason":"The incident produced lower-than-expected margins, but an ordered measurable stage sequence and downstream attrition effect are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C13R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not establish a population or item stream passing through ordered stages toward a specified desired outcome.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C13R01L02","evidence":"The orders incurred losses, while replay with the prior currency table produces positive margins.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C13R01L03","evidence":"Ledger, recorded settings, and access logs are available, but the specified stage transition events are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C13R01L04","evidence":"No local-stage improvement or downstream attrition displacement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q132BC2AFDF50"}