{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No scenario evidence establishes artifact-layer accumulation, aging, retention costs, removal risk, or stale-layer confusion.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes authentication traffic spikes, not accumulating artifact layers.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01R01L02","evidence":"No evidence concerns older artifacts losing capability, reliability, or validity.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01R01L03","evidence":"No evidence concerns costs of retaining unclear-purpose layers.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01R01L04","evidence":"No evidence concerns removal risks for historical or rollback layers.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01R01L05","evidence":"No evidence concerns stale layers being mistaken for current truth.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario establishes a demand surge but not mixed queue classes or the stated class-specific queue failures.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L01","evidence":"No queue classes or differing service requirements are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L02","evidence":"No eligible class is described as delaying another.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L03","evidence":"No urgent or safety-sensitive class is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L04","evidence":"No simple and complex work distinction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L05","evidence":"No specialized work routing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L06","evidence":"No exceptions or blocked cases are described as stalling routine flow.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01L07","evidence":"No aggregate metrics masking class-specific failures are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No persistent-entity observation or absence-versus-termination evidence is provided.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C03R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not describe entities persisting beyond reliable continuous observation.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C03R01L02","evidence":"The scenario does not describe temporary absence being confusable with termination.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No evidence establishes read-model mismatch, cross-service read fan-out, or unmanaged copies.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04R01L01","evidence":"No canonical-model write ownership or read-shape mismatch is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04R02L01","evidence":"No cross-service fan-out, remote joins, repeated aggregation, or graph traversal is described as dominating incidents.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04R03L01","evidence":"No copies or their source, lag, update, or retirement rules are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C04R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns service-load incidents, not durable retention of an encoded trace.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C05R01L01","evidence":"No lesson, skill, decision trace, or representation requiring later retention is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C05R01L02","evidence":"No recall or durable-retention assessment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C05R01L03","evidence":"No retained trace is described as vulnerable to interference or churn.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No two-sided commitments, maturity mismatch, rollover, or locked value are described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not describe two-sided commitments.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06R01L02","evidence":"No maturity or release horizons are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06R01L03","evidence":"No rollover, renewal, replenishment, or refresh dependency is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06R01L04","evidence":"No value locked beyond claim timing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06R01L05","evidence":"No stress-related reduction in resource availability versus quantity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The failures correlate with a public release time and overload, not established handoff failures or handoff ambiguity.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R01L01","evidence":"No handoff transition is identified as where failures cluster.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R02L01","evidence":"No handoff or hidden receiver context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R03L01","evidence":"No transition ownership is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R04L01","evidence":"No parties at a handoff or differing local languages are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C07R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Publicly synchronized ticket-release demand repeatedly spikes far above safe identity-service capacity, while daily and post-incident demand remain manageable.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C08R01L01","evidence":"Thousands refresh before a precise announced opening; authentication rises from about 600 to over 11,000 requests/second, above the 7,500 reliable limit, then falls below 900 fifteen minutes later and remains modest most of the day.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C08R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No waiting obligations outside workflow or unreliable item-level queue representation is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R01L01","evidence":"No known or suspected work waiting outside the active workflow is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R01L02","evidence":"No evidence concerns item-level representation of admitted obligations.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R02L01","evidence":"No aggregate counts masking waiting-item state are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R02L02","evidence":"No evidence concerns item-level representation of admitted obligations.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R03L01","evidence":"No actor disagreement about unreliable queue state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R03L02","evidence":"No evidence concerns item-level representation of admitted obligations.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R04L01","evidence":"No old neglected items or attention bias are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R04L02","evidence":"No evidence concerns item-level representation of admitted obligations.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C09R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No multi-participant decision, independent failure during consensus, persistence, partition tradeoff, or membership evidence is provided.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01L01","evidence":"No multiple participants proposing or acknowledging one logical decision are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01L02","evidence":"No correctness issue from divergent participant decisions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01L03","evidence":"No independently failing participants or communication paths during a decision are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01L04","evidence":"No decision requiring persistence across retry, leadership change, or recovery is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01L05","evidence":"No partition consistency-versus-availability tradeoff is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01L06","evidence":"No changing membership or earlier votes/log entries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C11","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Repeated predictable release-time arrivals exceed authentication capacity, produce timeouts and retries, and the incident is explicitly a service-capacity shortfall.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C11R01L01","evidence":"Authentication traffic jumps from about 600 to more than 11,000 requests/second, exceeding the identity service's reliable 7,500 requests/second limit.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C11R01L02","evidence":"Failures recur within seconds of publicly advertised ticket-release timestamps, which create predictable peaks.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C11R01L03","evidence":"Connection pools fill and response times exceed the app timeout, causing repeated login failures and retry waves.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C11R01L04","evidence":"The stated causal constraint is that the identity service's reliable capacity is exceeded; failures occur despite normal database, certificate, and network health.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C11R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No authority-bearing intermediary, deputy authority, ambient credentials, or originator-context loss is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C12R01L01","evidence":"No intermediary authority relative to request originators is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C12R01L02","evidence":"No actors lacking deputy authority or ability to shape requests are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C12R01L03","evidence":"No deputy, ambient credential, channel trust, or request-specific authorization is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C12R01L04","evidence":"No cross-boundary loss of originator identity, context, consent, scope, or intent is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No pathway activation barrier or competing pathways are established; the scenario identifies a capacity-exceeding demand burst.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C13R01L01","evidence":"No repeatable pathway barrier or activation cost is described as the main delay.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C13R01L02","evidence":"No competing pathways or harmful non-target outcomes from acceleration are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q16261AF2F967"}