{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario contains no evidence about representation transformations or equivariance requirements.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L01","evidence":"No input transformation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L02","evidence":"No corresponding output transformation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L03","evidence":"No reuse across representations or equivalent cases is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L04","evidence":"No representation-choice concern is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L05","evidence":"No downstream structural-transformation dependency is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L06","evidence":"Failures under harmless transformations are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L07","evidence":"No governance or fairness outcome from relabeling or ordering is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01L08","evidence":"No invariant-versus-variant quantity confusion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The poorer roster is a strict local optimum, while a substantially better feasible roster requires linked non-local changes; outcomes also differ by initial roster.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R01L01","evidence":"The 184-point roster has no legal improving single reassignment or pairwise exchange, while better feasible rosters exist.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R02L01","evidence":"The same data and runtime ended at 184 from August's roster and 61 from the manual roster.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R02L02","evidence":"The 184-point roster is a local trap; improving toward the verified 73-point roster requires six linked reassignments and any proper subset worsens or violates coverage.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R02","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R03L01","evidence":"The score is already a single combined penalty score over specialties, overtime, nights, and leave.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C02R03","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns isolated roster-search replays, not replicated shared state.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01L01","evidence":"No shared state across clients, replicas, or regions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01L02","evidence":"No lagging or divergent read copy is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01L03","evidence":"No delay or partition consistency decision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01L04","evidence":"No client-visible consistency invariant is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01L05","evidence":"No consistency mechanism or legality definition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01L06","evidence":"No replica incident or client-visible impact is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C04","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No ordered population funnel or stage-level attrition is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C04R01L01","evidence":"No population stream through ordered outcome stages is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C04R01L02","evidence":"No lower-than-expected final yield or conversion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C04R01L03","evidence":"No stage transition instrumentation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C04R01L04","evidence":"No downstream attrition effect from a stage improvement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario provides no evidence of cross-functional coordination or dependency failures.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L01","evidence":"No downstream discovery of unsafe upstream commitments is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L02","evidence":"No cross-functional task dependencies are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L03","evidence":"No coordination meetings or interface rework are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L04","evidence":"No parallel-work integration failure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L05","evidence":"No end-to-end ownership gap is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L06","evidence":"No conflicting shared-artifact versions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01L07","evidence":"No informal late change network is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No migration or source-to-target mapping is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06R01L01","evidence":"No identity-preserving transition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06R01L02","evidence":"No one-to-one source-target correspondence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06R01L03","evidence":"No governed target-set coverage is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06R01L04","evidence":"No backward trace or round-trip mapping is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06R01L05","evidence":"No evolving collection mapping is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish replicas or their convergence and recovery contract.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C07R01L01","evidence":"No replicas or replica contract are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No recurring unofficial workaround or suppression response is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01L01","evidence":"No recurring deviation across cases or teams is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01L02","evidence":"No impossible or harmful official compliance requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01L03","evidence":"No unauthorized workaround is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01L04","evidence":"No proposed suppression by leaders is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01L05","evidence":"No uneven spread of informal exceptions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01L06","evidence":"No undocumented adaptation in a regulated system is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario explicitly identifies feasible better rosters, while some other impossibility claims are not addressed.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R01L01","evidence":"A substantially better feasible roster is stated to be present.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R02L01","evidence":"A better feasible roster is present; no failure of every integrated design is established.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R02","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R03L01","evidence":"No checked three-guarantee pick-any-two impossibility is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R04L01","evidence":"A feasible roster is stated to exist, contrary to full-set infeasibility.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R04","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R05L01","evidence":"A substantially better feasible roster is explicitly present.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R05","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R06L01","evidence":"No divergent local exceptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C09R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No endpoint-only observation or loss-to-follow-up is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C10R01L01","evidence":"No completer-only or reachable-only endpoint outcome is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C10R01L02","evidence":"No dropout rate or group divergence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C10R01L03","evidence":"No outcome-dependent loss to follow-up is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No alternative aggregation boundaries, overlap, or competing summaries are described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11R01L01","evidence":"No alternative partitions or aggregate totals are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11R02L01","evidence":"No overlapping boundaries or double counting is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11R03L01","evidence":"No competing summaries of the same observations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C11R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish chunked processing, partial-result merging, or hierarchy rollups.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12R01L01","evidence":"No required chunk, shard, or hierarchy processing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12R01L02","evidence":"No partial-result merging is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12R01L03","evidence":"Different initial rosters, not deployment topologies or worker counts, yield different answers.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12R01L04","evidence":"No scalar-summary recombination loss is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12R01L05","evidence":"No reporting hierarchy rollup is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No scale-up, cross-scale inference, normalization assumption, or transfer across contexts is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C13R01L01","evidence":"No pilot or small-sample result is used to justify scale-up.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C13R01L02","evidence":"No aggregate rule is applied to individual units.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C13R01L03","evidence":"No normalized fairness metric is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C13R01L04","evidence":"No transfer across size, geography, time, throughput, or granularity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q1C307054DC72"}