{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a baseline-based anomaly interpretation workflow.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01L01","evidence":"No baseline, target, norm, comparator, range, or null is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01L02","evidence":"The scenario describes crosscutting classifications, not ambiguity in raw observations across the listed contexts.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01L03","evidence":"No departure is described as needing tracking, review, escalation, or analysis.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01L04","evidence":"No observation is stated to be normal under one baseline and abnormal under another.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01L05","evidence":"No baseline version or drift affecting historical interpretation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01L06","evidence":"No delta, residual, variance, anomaly, or out-of-range flag is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario establishes classification mismatch and exclusion of testimony, but not the observer-reactivity mechanisms required by these routes.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R01L01","evidence":"No behavior change caused by awareness of observers or governors is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R02L01","evidence":"Members and researchers use crosscutting classifications, but stable conflicting descriptions caused by observer positions are not explicitly established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R03L01","evidence":"No metric, classification, forecast, or audit is stated to alter incentives or future observability.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R04L01","evidence":"No affected party is described disputing the conclusions and their category boundary.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R05L01","evidence":"No controller and adaptive control-rule behavior are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R06L01","evidence":"No model is stated to become self-fulfilling, self-defeating, gameable, stigmatizing, or obsolete through use.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R07L01","evidence":"No system identity or boundary is stated to be reproduced through observation and communication.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C02R07","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario does not explicitly use observable traces to discriminate among hypotheses.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R01L01","evidence":"The report has findings, but the scenario does not state that a trace is used to support, weaken, or discriminate among hypotheses.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R01L02","evidence":"No alternative explanation or defeater for a particular trace is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R02L01","evidence":"The scenario does not explicitly describe trace-based discrimination among hypotheses.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R02L02","evidence":"No apparatus or observation limit producing measurement noise is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R03L01","evidence":"The scenario does not explicitly describe trace-based discrimination among hypotheses.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R03L02","evidence":"Observer notes and laboratory ratings remain admissible, but their accumulation, weighting, or comparison across sources is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C03R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C04","confidence":0.87,"reason":"The director evaluates episode classifications using source credentials as an untested proxy for evidentiary relevance.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C04R01L01","evidence":"Researchers classify recorded episodes and the final report presents findings about them.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C04R01L02","evidence":"The director applies an admissibility standard: believer testimony is excluded while credentialed-researcher material remains admissible.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C04R01L03","evidence":"Credentialed researcher status is an institutionally rewarded cue used in the evidentiary decision.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C04R01L04","evidence":"Testimony is excluded and notes and ratings are retained solely by source position, without identified inconsistency, fabrication, or sampling defects.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C04R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C05","confidence":0.94,"reason":"Believer testimony is pre-discredited, but the fuller closed-information-environment pattern is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C05R01L01","evidence":"The evidentiary intake excludes congregant interviews because they were produced by believers.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C05R01L02","evidence":"No internal reinforcement being stronger than external correction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C05R01L03","evidence":"Congregant testimony is pre-discredited as inherently apologetic.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C05R01L04","evidence":"The director presents confident findings, but no members' experience of the filtered environment as complete is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No delayed reconstruction of an event record is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L01","evidence":"No material delay between occurrence, capture, and decision use is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L02","evidence":"No after-the-fact evidence is added to an authoritative earlier record.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L03","evidence":"No original event record is described as incomplete, noisy, absent, ambiguous, or overwritten.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L04","evidence":"No distinction in decision weight among observed, reported, inferred, reconstructed, or corrected claims is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L05","evidence":"No missing or silent evidence is interpreted as proof of no event.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L06","evidence":"No timeline, case, audit, research, or incident record is stated to be reconstructed after an event.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01L07","evidence":"No memory or institutional pressure reshaping a record after an event is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly describes crosscutting local and researcher categories, source-position dismissal, divergent meanings, and official displacement of local distinctions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R01L01","evidence":"Several locally distinct states enter one clinical class, while locally named episodes receive different research codes.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R01L02","evidence":"Research classifications group together locally distinct states and omit the members' distinguishing terms.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R02L01","evidence":"The local and research schemes explicitly crosscut rather than align one-to-one.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R02L02","evidence":"The director dismisses congregant testimony solely because believers produced it.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R02","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R03L01","evidence":"The local and research schemes explicitly crosscut rather than align one-to-one.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R03L02","evidence":"Members distinguish episodes through obligations, kin recognition, and ritual competence, whereas researchers code them through clinical and observable-conduct categories.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R03","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R04L01","evidence":"The local and research schemes explicitly crosscut rather than align one-to-one.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R04L02","evidence":"The director makes the researcher-produced account official by excluding interviews, and the report omits the displaced local distinctions.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C07R04","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not concern verification of identity or origin for a downstream decision.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L01","evidence":"No identity or origin claim by an actor, record, source, or credential is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L02","evidence":"No downstream access, custody, payment, attribution, or similar decision is described as depending on an identity claim.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L03","evidence":"No identity claim is described as vulnerable to imitation, replay, substitution, theft, forgery, staleness, delegation, or confusion.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L04","evidence":"No repeatable verification procedure for an asserted identity or origin is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L05","evidence":"No balancing of false acceptance and false rejection is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L06","evidence":"No identity verdict scope based on freshness, capability, context, custody, trust anchor, or assurance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01L07","evidence":"No legible identity-verdict decision state before downstream processing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The director suspects believer testimony of systematic distortion, but the other source-reliability conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not state that the receiver cannot directly inspect the reality reported by the interviews.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09R01L02","evidence":"The director asserts that believer-produced testimony is inherently apologetic, indicating suspected systematic distortion.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09R01L03","evidence":"The scenario does not explicitly establish that the account is retained as potentially useful information.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09R01L04","evidence":"No differential reliability among portions of an account is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09R01L05","evidence":"No difference between telling order, emphasis, or framing and event order or causal structure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario describes classificatory omission, not a copied or compliance-oriented representational form producing the specified effects.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10R01L01","evidence":"No representation is described as structurally preventing its intended understanding, use, or enactment.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10R01L02","evidence":"No form copied from another context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10R01L03","evidence":"No divergence between an artifact's stated content and its structural effects on users is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10R01L04","evidence":"No formal compliance hollowing out intended function, value, or obligation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10R01L05","evidence":"No aesthetic, procedural, or technical form is treated as neutral while shaping interpretation or action.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C11","confidence":0.93,"reason":"The scenario establishes context-dependent local meaning and loss through classification, but not all conditions concerning a later audience and surface facts.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C11R01L01","evidence":"A final report is being prepared, but a later audience without direct access to the original setting is not explicitly described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C11R01L02","evidence":"Members distinguish states according to obligations, kin recognition, and ritual competence.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C11R01L03","evidence":"The scenario does not state that surface facts are easy to record yet easy to misinterpret outside their setting.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C11R01L04","evidence":"The report omits local meaning-bearing terms while grouping together episodes that members distinguish.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C12","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario is an observational classificatory study, not a comparison of an intervention with alternative conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C12R01L01","evidence":"The described study classifies mediumship episodes; it does not compare a new treatment, policy, product, message, workflow, or teaching method with an alternative.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C12R01L02","evidence":"No treatment-versus-comparator research contrast is described; the stated contrasts are classificatory labels for episodes.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C12R01L03","evidence":"No participants, units, sites, or users are described as receiving alternative conditions, and no historical or external comparator is described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C12R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The local terms materially affect interpretation, but the scenario does not establish the remaining artifact-focused inspection conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01L01","evidence":"The report omits the terms by which members distinguish episodes that research classifications group together, making those terms materially interpretive.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01L02","evidence":"No higher-order claim from a compact artifact with an invisible or irreproducible path from cited unit to claim is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01L03","evidence":"No competing readings are described as disagreeing over what particular words, relations, or formal choices license.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01L04","evidence":"No stated interpretive stakes of the listed kinds justify slower textual inspection.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01L05","evidence":"No paraphrase, search snippet, machine summary, extracted quotation, or inherited gloss is described as replacing source examination.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01L06","evidence":"No bounded artifact is described as short or segmentable enough for task-relevant grain inspection.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q2BD3BAF489D2"}