{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route condition is fully established by the scenario.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01R01L01","evidence":"The scenario reports agreement among manager ratings, not a universal-consensus claim without population evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01R01L02","evidence":"No visible opinion sample selected for social proximity, vocality, expertise, or motivation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01R01L03","evidence":"No identity, expertise, incentive, or environment match between a decision-maker and a visible opinion sample is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that absent or low-power groups may differ from a visible sample.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01R01L05","evidence":"Staffing shortages are described, but not time pressure causing anecdotal agreement to replace prevalence evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route has all required conditions established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R01L01","evidence":"Leadership profiles are reported, but no familiar archetype explaining a new case is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R01L02","evidence":"The reorganization occurred during staffing shortages, but high ambiguity or decision time pressure is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R01L03","evidence":"No single vivid similarity dominating attention is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that assigning an archetypal pattern changes action.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R02L01","evidence":"Leadership profiles are reported, but no familiar archetype explaining a new case is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R02L02","evidence":"No single vivid similarity dominating attention is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R02L03","evidence":"No prestige, blame value, or organizational currency of an archetype is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R02L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that assigning an archetypal pattern changes action.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R03L01","evidence":"Leadership profiles are reported, but no familiar archetype explaining a new case is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R03L02","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that assigning an archetypal pattern changes action.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R03L03","evidence":"No pattern library or archetype index is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C02R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish the route's institutional-code conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03R01L01","evidence":"No unwritten expectations governing success are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03R01L02","evidence":"The evaluation uses named trait scales, not vague fit or professionalism proxies.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03R01L03","evidence":"No equally capable entrants with differing participation or recognition rates are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03R01L04","evidence":"No onboarding or policy omission is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03R01L05","evidence":"No environmental cues marking users as native or visitors are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C04","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Neither unfamiliarity-driven evaluation nor recognition ease affecting evaluation is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C04R01L01","evidence":"No unfamiliar new target and no resulting depressed evaluation or adoption are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C04R01L02","evidence":"Ease of defending the shortlist is described, not ease of recognizing, remembering, navigating, or understanding the evaluated target.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish the visibility, cost, and conformity conditions together.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01L01","evidence":"No observation of peers, leaders, majorities, rankings, or reference groups' apparent beliefs or actions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01L02","evidence":"No cost of nonalignment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01L03","evidence":"No uncertain actors treating a visible group standard as evidence are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01L04","evidence":"No contrast between public expression and private belief is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01L05","evidence":"No majority, elite, metric, cohort, profession, or clique is established as a de facto standard without review.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01L06","evidence":"No self-reinforcing past conformity mechanism is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route condition concerning a proportional design system is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C06R01L01","evidence":"No relative design dimensions communicating meaning are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C06R01L02","evidence":"No design translation across bodies, devices, sites, products, or fabrication processes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C06R01L03","evidence":"No hand-tuned sizes or inconsistent local exceptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C06R01L04","evidence":"No formal ratio system or conflict with use, content, accessibility, or structure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish cross-study comparability or significance-over-magnitude conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C07R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes one review form, not studies using differing instruments, units, or coefficient scales.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C07R01L02","evidence":"No use of significance, p-values, or effect direction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C07R01L03","evidence":"No raw estimates across populations, measures, or periods are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route condition about ability conclusions, overconfidence, or fixed-ability diagnosis is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R01L01","evidence":"No broad ability conclusion from few performance episodes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R02L01","evidence":"No early success, corrective feedback sequence, or overconfidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R03L01","evidence":"No failure is treated as proof of fixed inability.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R04L01","evidence":"No stable self-diagnosis from context-varying performance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C08R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Readiness must be judged for the promotion decision, but the remaining conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C09R01L01","evidence":"Northbridge is selecting department heads and ranks a leadership profile as a predictor of readiness.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C09R01L02","evidence":"No actor's confidence and its effect on autonomy, delegation, risk, learning, or participation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C09R01L03","evidence":"No feedback process with the specified deficiencies is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C09R01L04","evidence":"No divergence between self-assessed competence and benchmarked performance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route establishes audience-conditioned responding together with the required interpretation or corroborating evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R01L01","evidence":"Managers saw a provisional promotion slate, but the scenario does not establish that their responses changed because names, roles, rankings, peers, leaders, clients, or cameras were present.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R01L02","evidence":"Executives treat rating agreement as evidence of coherent capability, but audience-conditioned responses are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R02L01","evidence":"No public unanimity paired with private doubt, reversal, anonymous complaints, or low follow-through is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R03L01","evidence":"No retaliation, stigma, status loss, exclusion, or reputational reward for a response is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R03L02","evidence":"Executives treat rating agreement as evidence of coherent capability, but audience-conditioned responses are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R04L01","evidence":"No online system exposing popularity, identity, reactions, or durable history before independent judgment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R04L02","evidence":"Executives treat rating agreement as evidence of coherent capability, but audience-conditioned responses are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C10R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No evolutionary-population route condition is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11R01L01","evidence":"No variant population is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11R01L02","evidence":"No differential persistence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11R01L03","evidence":"No trait carry-forward process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11R01L04","evidence":"No meaningful but incomplete selection pressure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11R01L05","evidence":"No future adaptation role for diversity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route condition concerning staged recognition in a large feature space is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C12R01L01","evidence":"No candidate class or feature space too large for exhaustive checking is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C12R01L02","evidence":"No cheap broad features and expensive post-narrowing features are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C12R01L03","evidence":"No early high-recall screen and later high-precision authoritative stage are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C12R01L04","evidence":"No fine-detail-first or overly coarse screening error is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"All route conditions are directly supported by the common-manager review process and the resulting cross-dimensional dashboard interpretation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C13R01L01","evidence":"For every candidate, the current manager scores all four traits on adjacent scales in one quarterly review form, completed in the same two-week period.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C13R01L02","evidence":"The dashboard reports strong correlations, groups candidates into leadership profiles, and ranks one profile as the clearest predictor of readiness.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C13R01L03","evidence":"Managers rated during severe staffing shortages, had seen the provisional slate, used a one-screen identical-anchor form, and often did not distinguish the scales in comments.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C13R01L04","evidence":"The committee prefers the dashboard's compact account because it is easy to defend, despite no established independent observation paths for the four traits.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9C13R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q2C68BBACFDC9"}