{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario describes capacity saturation from active work, not a circular mutual wait.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01R01L01","evidence":"Requests occupy slots while executing and arrivals outpace completed releases; no circular wait is described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01R01L02","evidence":"No participant-specific reason not to release a claim first is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01R01L03","evidence":"Gateway instances have a fixed pool of worker slots, which are unavailable to new calls while occupied.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01R01L04","evidence":"New calls arrive faster than completed transactions release slots, so ordinary processing cannot reduce occupancy fast enough.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01R01L05","evidence":"Side effects of breaking a cycle are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C01R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario is about processing capacity, not a shared logical decision among participants.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01L01","evidence":"Merchant calls execute payment work; no participants proposing or acknowledging values for one logical decision are described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01L02","evidence":"No differing correct decisions or resulting safety violation is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01L03","evidence":"Independent participant or communication-path failures during a decision are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01L04","evidence":"Persistence across retry, leadership change, or recovery is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01L05","evidence":"A partition availability-versus-consistency tradeoff is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01L06","evidence":"Changing membership and validity of earlier votes or log entries are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C02R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03","confidence":0.93,"reason":"Scarce worker slots are established, but the multi-resource ordering and mutual-hostage structure are not.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01L01","evidence":"The scenario establishes worker-slot occupancy but does not establish that actors acquire more than one listed resource or commitment.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01L02","evidence":"Each gateway has a fixed worker-slot pool and calls can enter only while slots are available.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01L03","evidence":"Different acquisition orders are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01L04","evidence":"Release is described through transaction completion; unsafe or costly release/rollback/preemption is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01L05","evidence":"Negotiation, approval, or governance-based hostage-taking is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01L06","evidence":"High occupancy creates saturation, but circular blocking from rare interleavings or crises is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C04","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario explicitly rules out non-work or obsolete slot occupants.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C04R01L01","evidence":"Worker slots must remain available for new calls to enter, establishing a functional access surface.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C04R01L02","evidence":"Tracing found every occupied slot tied to a live authenticated request executing requested work, with no non-work or obsolete claim.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C04R01L03","evidence":"Queueing delay and timeouts rise sharply beyond roughly three quarters occupancy.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C04R01L04","evidence":"The stated imbalance is between legitimate incoming work and transaction completion, not passive shedding versus deposition.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C04R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The scenario establishes overload but not differentiated queue classes or class-specific failures.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L01","evidence":"Materially different service requirements within one queue are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L02","evidence":"Repeated delay or crowd-out of one eligible class by another is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L03","evidence":"Urgent or safety-sensitive items buried in routine backlog are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L04","evidence":"Simple work waiting behind complex work is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L05","evidence":"Specialized work being misrouted to general paths is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L06","evidence":"Exceptions or blocked cases stalling routine flow are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01L07","evidence":"Aggregate metrics concealing class-specific failures are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly describes sustained arrival demand exceeding slot-release capacity and unacceptable backlog effects.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C06R01L01","evidence":"Requests arrive faster than completed transactions release worker slots.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C06R01L02","evidence":"During the promotional sale, occupancy rises steadily toward the pool limit.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C06R01L03","evidence":"Beyond roughly three quarters capacity, queueing delay rises sharply and timeout rates accelerate.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C06R01L04","evidence":"The stated central issue is that completed transactions cannot release slots as fast as new calls consume them.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C06R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C07","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Replica convergence and recovery contracts are not addressed.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C07R01L01","evidence":"The scenario provides no evidence about replicas or their convergence, conflict, tombstone, and recovery contract.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C08","confidence":0.91,"reason":"The main delay is capacity-driven queueing, not a repeatable pathway activation barrier.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C08R01L01","evidence":"The scenario identifies worker-slot saturation and arrivals exceeding completion capacity as the cause of delay.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C08R01L02","evidence":"Competing pathways or non-target outcomes from acceleration are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C08R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No two-sided maturity, rollover, or liquidity-horizon structure is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09R01L01","evidence":"Two-sided commitments are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09R01L02","evidence":"Unequal maturity or release horizons are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09R01L03","evidence":"Rollover, renewal, replenishment, or refresh of a short side is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09R01L04","evidence":"Value locked beyond when claims require it is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09R01L05","evidence":"Stress or rollover closure affecting availability is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No project-scope expansion or change-governance evidence is provided.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L01","evidence":"An initially sized project, policy, or responsibility boundary is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L02","evidence":"Informal additions with lighter friction than removals or rebaselining are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L03","evidence":"Drift from an original charter to expanded scope is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L04","evidence":"Cumulative locally reasonable additions changing delivery scope are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L05","evidence":"Ownership of longitudinal scope trajectory is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L06","evidence":"Accumulating dependencies, exceptions, or integration requests are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01L07","evidence":"An unchanged formal objective with materially expanded required work is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C11","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Worker slots have some site-like properties, but fit-based assignment is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C11R01L01","evidence":"Gateway worker slots remain identifiable while different merchant requests occupy and later release them.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C11R01L02","evidence":"Each gateway has a fixed slot-pool capacity independent of a particular request.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C11R01L03","evidence":"Availability and release of slots determine whether new calls can enter.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C11R01L04","evidence":"Assignments based on fit between an occupant and a constrained site are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario contains no acquisition-window or developmental evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C12R01L01","evidence":"No longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative acquisition evidence across time or state is provided.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C12R01L02","evidence":"No target configuration requiring experience, cue exposure, practice, interaction, or treatment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C12R01L03","evidence":"No bounded opening or closing interval is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C12R01L04","evidence":"No durable disadvantage from missing an interval is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a trunk-to-terminal endpoint distribution structure.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C13R01L01","evidence":"A high-volume consolidated upstream trunk is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C13R01L02","evidence":"Branching into many low-volume heterogeneous endpoints is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C13R01L03","evidence":"Endpoint completion requiring local access, timing, adaptation, custody, assistance, or verification is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C13R01L04","evidence":"A comparison between upstream throughput and verified endpoint completion is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q325A8ED70ED7"}