{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC01","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The scenario does not establish hidden state, degraded signals, symptom ambiguity, or observer disagreement.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC01R01L01","evidence":"Actual reach is reported through audience records, but no relevant state is stated to be hidden or too costly to observe.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC01R01L02","evidence":"No evidence characterizes the available signals as noisy, delayed, partial, biased, or indirect measures of a state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC01R01L03","evidence":"No evidence says distinct hidden states yield similar visible symptoms.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC01R01L04","evidence":"No disagreement among observers or instruments is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario concerns warning distribution, but does not establish the specified hazard-transport, target-vulnerability, pathway, or intervention conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01L01","evidence":"No harmful agent or burden traveling from a source to a target is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01L02","evidence":"No heterogeneous vulnerability among targets is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01L03","evidence":"No control-selection timing relative to an explicit transport pathway is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01L04","evidence":"The outlets distribute notices, but are not established as media transmitting a hazard.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01L05","evidence":"No blocked route or substituted hazard path is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01L06","evidence":"No risk claim based on reachability of every target through exposure paths is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R02L01","evidence":"No remedial intervention creating or intensifying a harmful exposure route is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC02R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Seven outlets are used, while text and television dominate both public reach and approval attention; the outage also shows remaining outlets cannot substitute for their reach.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R01L01","evidence":"The city issues notices through seven public outlets.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R01L02","evidence":"Text alerts account for 58% of officially warned residents and television 26%; officials also approve wording for those two first.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R02L01","evidence":"The city uses seven public outlets.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R02L02","evidence":"No shared upstream infrastructure, ownership, geography, standards, labor, funding, credentials, or failure mode is established among outlets.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R03L01","evidence":"The city uses seven public outlets.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R03L02","evidence":"When text service failed, the five other available outlets did not prevent information-line surges or many residents missing the notice.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC03R03","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish artifact-module seams or the specified organizational-architecture relationships.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R01L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams mapped to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R01L02","evidence":"No producer-organization change or preserved architecture topology is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R02L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams mapped to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R02L02","evidence":"No desired architecture or weak intergroup communication links are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R03L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams mapped to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R03L02","evidence":"No concentration of integration work lacking an organizational integration channel or role is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R04L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams mapped to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R04L02","evidence":"No local module optimization fragmenting a user journey or whole-system behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R05L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams mapped to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R05L02","evidence":"No informal communication network or official reporting structure comparison is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R06L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams mapped to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R06L02","evidence":"No artifact failure attributed to coordination overhead rather than technical skill is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC04R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No information-suppression act or resulting replication dynamic is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01L01","evidence":"No information-control act is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01L02","evidence":"No audience interpretation of suppression is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01L03","evidence":"The public outlets can distribute notices, but no replication or forwarding of suppressed information is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01L04","evidence":"No fragile trust or legitimacy surrounding a control act is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01L05","evidence":"No targeting of information or increased audience interest is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01L06","evidence":"No containment attempt or copying-outpacing-pursuit dynamic is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC06","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The notices are attention-directed, but repeated low-quality firings and missing signal feedback are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC06R01L01","evidence":"Evacuation and severe-weather notices through public outlets are explicitly intended to gain residents' attention.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC06R01L02","evidence":"Four emergencies are mentioned, but repeated exposure to similar firings or routine warnings is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC06R01L03","evidence":"No false positives, stale reminders, wrong-recipient messages, or low-actionability warnings are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC06R01L04","evidence":"Audience reach records exist, but the scenario does not establish absence of reliable feedback on notice, action, usefulness, falsity, duplication, or harm.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No propagating packet with the stated transport, measurement, and intervention properties is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01L01","evidence":"No bounded-origin disturbance or signal packet is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01L02","evidence":"No moving and widening, thinning, fragmenting, or decohering packet is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01L03","evidence":"No medium-dependent differential packet travel is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01L04","evidence":"No decisions based on concentration, exposure, coherence, arrival distribution, or tail behavior are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01L05","evidence":"No single-point or single-time sampling risk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01L06","evidence":"No before-, during-, or after-propagation intervention is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish expanding issuance, cheap signaling incentives, receiver learning, or the other listed signal-management conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01L01","evidence":"No growing share of cases receiving the same signal is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01L02","evidence":"No comparison of issuance cost with reputational benefit is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01L03","evidence":"No receiver learning from false, weak, stale, or non-actionable firings is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01L04","evidence":"No failure to renew, retire, revalidate, or differentiate signals over changing contexts is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01L05","evidence":"No promised response is identified or shown decoupled from actual action.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01L06","evidence":"No sender competition through escalating salience is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No aggregate-versus-local indicator structure, local alarm rule, or concealed subgroup deterioration is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01L01","evidence":"No aggregate stability and unusual local-unit variation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01L02","evidence":"No frequent local alarms or rule distinguishing local noise from system movement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01L03","evidence":"No nested indicator levels collected separately under different owners are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01L04","evidence":"No early-warning process based on weak local signals is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01L05","evidence":"No frontline observations and leadership metric comparison is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01L06","evidence":"No favorable aggregate concealing regional or subgroup deterioration is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish attention overload or misses caused by salience, interruption, politics, or default allocation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R01L01","evidence":"No technically visible critical signal being missed is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R01L02","evidence":"No overload or miss is attributed to salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than value-risk allocation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R02L01","evidence":"No pattern of urgent interruptions crowding out important non-urgent work is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R02L02","evidence":"No overload or miss is attributed to salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than value-risk allocation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R03L01","evidence":"No evidence shows teams, operators, leaders, or learners facing too many channels at once.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R03L02","evidence":"No overload or miss is attributed to salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than value-risk allocation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R04L01","evidence":"No evidence shows alerts, dashboards, meetings, or messages multiplying until people ignore them.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R04L02","evidence":"No overload or miss is attributed to salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than value-risk allocation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R05L01","evidence":"Senior officials approve wording, but leadership attention is not established as the bottleneck for decisions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R05L02","evidence":"No overload or miss is attributed to salience, urgency, interruption, politics, or default rather than value-risk allocation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC10R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish competing nearby signals and boundary discrimination requirements.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11R01L01","evidence":"No many nearby active signals making a decisive local boundary difficult to resolve are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11R01L02","evidence":"No focal signal requiring distinction from genuinely close competitors is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11R01L03","evidence":"No uniform amplification preserving poor discrimination is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11R01L04","evidence":"No meaningful neighborhood relation for competing signals is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11R01L05","evidence":"No downstream selection requiring sharpened boundaries between nearby alternatives is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario provides no quoted message or record using the listed context-dependent terms.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC12R01L01","evidence":"No message or record text containing any specified context-dependent word is provided.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC12R01L02","evidence":"No interpretation dependency on role, jurisdiction, workflow state, version, environment, channel, selected object, or meeting context is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish bounded signaling, porous audience boundaries, differing adjacent interpretation, or capacity-limited response channels.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC13R01L01","evidence":"The city distributes public notices broadly, but bounded signaling is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC13R01L02","evidence":"No porous audience boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC13R01L03","evidence":"No differing adjacent interpretation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC13R01L04","evidence":"Calls surged, but the scenario does not establish that response channels were capacity-limited.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q60AC7329986AC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q60AC7329986A"}