{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C01","confidence":0.91,"reason":"The scenario specifies a governing codebook that assigns every specimen exactly one code.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C01R01L01","evidence":"An 18,000-entry governing codebook assigns every specimen exactly one controlling code.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C01R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario does not describe an exact identity-preserving migration or its mapping properties.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02R01L01","evidence":"Legacy records are mentioned, but no migration claiming exact identity or information preservation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02R01L02","evidence":"No one-to-one source-to-target correspondence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02R01L03","evidence":"No governed target set or source coverage of it is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02R01L04","evidence":"No trace-back or round-trip mapping is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02R01L05","evidence":"No exact mapping is described as persisting through collection changes.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03","confidence":0.92,"reason":"The standard requires one indivisible code, not a choice on each of multiple dimensions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01L01","evidence":"Every specimen receives exactly one indivisible code; multi-code combinations are invalid.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01L02","evidence":"No factorial design, scenario cube, or configuration matrix is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01L03","evidence":"No coverage claim based on generated axis cells is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01L04","evidence":"Combining codes is invalid, but no infeasible combinations in a product-space design are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01L05","evidence":"No exhaustive product-space testing or reduction rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01L06","evidence":"No axes or levels are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C03R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04","confidence":0.97,"reason":"No multi-operation transaction, intermediate failure, or commit boundary is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes code assignment and retrieval, not a bundle of operations forming one action.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04R01L02","evidence":"No ordered dependent operations or between-step failures are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04R01L03","evidence":"No partial-success state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04R01L04","evidence":"No intermediate transactional state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04R01L05","evidence":"No commit, rollback, or compensation mechanism is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario does not present an interpretive claim derived from a compact source artifact.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01L01","evidence":"No material textual or formal wording dispute is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01L02","evidence":"No higher-order claim from a compact artifact is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01L03","evidence":"No competing readings of particular words or formal choices are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01L04","evidence":"Operational restrictions are described, but no interpretation whose stakes turn on textual grain is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01L05","evidence":"No paraphrase, snippet, machine summary, quotation, or inherited gloss is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01L06","evidence":"No bounded source artifact for close inspection is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C06","confidence":0.96,"reason":"No drifting reference state or intervention tradeoff is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C06R01L01","evidence":"No current state drifting from a valued reference state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C06R01L02","evidence":"No delay-driven irreversible loss or intervention damage is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C06R01L03","evidence":"No contested or partially documented reference state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario describes a codebook and erroneous multi-code legacy records, but not source-dependent use or degraded provenance cues.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07R01L01","evidence":"No commingled information store is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07R01L02","evidence":"Use is described as depending on the applicable controlling code, not on source class.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07R01L03","evidence":"No indirect or degraded source cues are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07R01L04","evidence":"No fluency being mistaken for evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07R01L05","evidence":"Multi-code errors create operational costs, but downstream consequences of source-classification errors are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Although the scenario has a large code universe, case-specific retrieval, and costs from excessive active entries, it explicitly forbids combinatorial representation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08R01L01","evidence":"The codebook has 18,000 entries and only one entry matters for any specimen.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08R01L02","evidence":"Handlers need to retrieve the applicable code immediately without searching thousands of irrelevant entries.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08R01L03","evidence":"Combining codes is explicitly invalid; pairs or groups do not represent more specific cases.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08R01L04","evidence":"Dozens of codes expand packets, stall synchronization, clutter labels, and obscure the controlling instruction.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08R01L05","evidence":"A short universal list cannot substitute because the correct code varies with specimen-specific factors.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C08R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C09","confidence":0.96,"reason":"No repeatedly retrieved stable pattern with an activation-time correction is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C09R01L01","evidence":"No stored narrative, belief, routine, association, classification, or response repeatedly guiding behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C09R01L02","evidence":"Mistaken multi-code legacy records are mentioned, but no stable trace reasserting itself when cued is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C09R01L03","evidence":"Immediate retrieval is described, but no recognizable activation moment for a target pattern is specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C09R01L04","evidence":"No correction or alternative association introduced while a target pattern is active is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10","confidence":0.96,"reason":"No inclusive combination of multiple source collections is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10R01L01","evidence":"No several-source inclusive membership rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10R01L02","evidence":"No overlapping source collections or deduplication requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10R01L03","evidence":"No any-source inclusion rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10R01L04","evidence":"Imported legacy records are mentioned, but incompatible identifiers or update cadences across sources are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10R01L05","evidence":"No inclusive combined list treated as a validated truth set is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario does not describe serial defensive layers or aligned safety-control failures.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L01","evidence":"No serious-harm trajectory through serial defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L02","evidence":"No defensive-layer failure probabilities are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L03","evidence":"No dependence among defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L04","evidence":"No safety claim counting nominal layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L05","evidence":"No incidents involving failed controls are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L06","evidence":"No distributed ownership of defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01L07","evidence":"No rare aligned catastrophic failure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12","confidence":0.96,"reason":"No version evolution, version mismatch, or historical interpretation requirement is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12R01L01","evidence":"No codebook, rule, dataset, or workflow change over time is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12R01L02","evidence":"No actors relying on different unrecognized versions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12R01L03","evidence":"No need to interpret past versions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12R01L04","evidence":"No compatibility status for changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12R01L05","evidence":"No distinction between current authority and historical record is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13","confidence":0.97,"reason":"No multi-participant decision protocol, failures, persistence, or partition tradeoff is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01L01","evidence":"No multiple participants proposing or acknowledging one logical decision are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01L02","evidence":"No conflicting correct participant decisions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01L03","evidence":"No participant or communication-path failures during a decision are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01L04","evidence":"No decision persistence across retry, leadership change, or recovery is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01L05","evidence":"No availability-consistency tradeoff during partitions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01L06","evidence":"No changing membership or prior votes/log entries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q70AF98913A98"}