{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The export transforms context, but no evidence establishes the remaining instruction-execution conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01L01","evidence":"The entries are messages whose authority is being interpreted by reviewers.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01L02","evidence":"No evidence establishes a shared data/control substrate or content-only boundary.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01L03","evidence":"No untrusted input concatenation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01L04","evidence":"No trusted intermediary executing with broader authority is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01L05","evidence":"The exported file strips portal screens and changes the context available for interpretation.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01L06","evidence":"No blacklist, informal convention, or post-hoc-audit reliance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The file contains explicitly context-dependent terms, and their force depends on role, jurisdiction, state, and context.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C02R01L01","evidence":"Entries include “Approved,” “owner: you,” “use current vendor,” and “this can be closed.”","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C02R01L02","evidence":"The scenario expressly states that force changes with role, authority, jurisdiction, and workflow state.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C02R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03","confidence":0.93,"reason":"The export's stripped structure impedes understanding, but the other structural-form conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03R01L01","evidence":"The export contains the entries but lacks portal context, preventing reviewers from determining their scope.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03R01L02","evidence":"No copied form from another context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03R01L03","evidence":"The scenario shows ambiguity, not a demonstrated divergence between wording and induced inference or action.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03R01L04","evidence":"No formal-compliance hollowing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03R01L05","evidence":"No evidence says the export's form was treated as neutral.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish assent by engagement or any associated burden-shifting mechanism.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01L01","evidence":"No surface action with additional asserted consequences is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01L02","evidence":"No embedded premise of the specified kind is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01L03","evidence":"No treatment of silence, receipt, or engagement as assent is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01L04","evidence":"No inability to challenge a premise while retaining a surface task is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01L05","evidence":"No downstream record treatment of participation as proposition acceptance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01L06","evidence":"No premise sponsor or burden-shifting benefit is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05","confidence":0.88,"reason":"Authority and assignment depend on records and states that changed, but no check-to-use workflow or handling pattern is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01L01","evidence":"The force of approvals depends on employee assignment, authority, jurisdiction, and workflow state.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01L02","evidence":"No prior identification, cache, reservation, promise, or check before use is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01L03","evidence":"States and assignments changed, but no change specifically between a check and use is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01L04","evidence":"The changed assignment and stripped context have produced a protested award and unresolved authority questions.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01L05","evidence":"No implicit-default or late-failure handling is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01L06","evidence":"No repeated incidents or listed stale-reference patterns are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish the distributed-verification and scarce-issuance requirements.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06R01L01","evidence":"No need for many distributed verifiers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06R01L02","evidence":"No scarce or privileged issuance requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06R01L03","evidence":"No value or harm from forgery is specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06R01L04","evidence":"No privileged-disclosure-free verification requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06R01L05","evidence":"No artifact traveling beyond issuer control is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Identity and authority claims are material and context-scoped, but the evidence and decision-procedure requirements are not fully established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L01","evidence":"Entries identify an “owner” and purport to show approvals from particular authority roles.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L02","evidence":"Whether the approval came from the appropriate authority affects the procurement and appeal decision.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L03","evidence":"The assigned buyer transferred divisions, and authority varies across roles, states, and workflow stages.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L04","evidence":"No repeatable admissible-evidence procedure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L05","evidence":"The scenario does not establish a stated balance between false acceptance and false rejection.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L06","evidence":"The asserted approval force is expressly scoped by role, authority, jurisdiction, and workflow state.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01L07","evidence":"No required legible decision state before a downstream system proceeds is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No property transfer by association is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C08R01L01","evidence":"No decision assigns a property through proximity, co-membership, endorsement, or a shared label.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C08R01L02","evidence":"No relevant associative causal or evidential pathway is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C08R01L03","evidence":"No associative link is offered as a warrant for property transfer.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario contains no universal-category claim or counterexample-driven boundary contraction.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01L01","evidence":"No universal, purity, essence, or identity-form claim is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01L02","evidence":"No counterexample to such a claim is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01L03","evidence":"No post-counterexample authenticity language is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01L04","evidence":"No challenged membership criteria are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01L05","evidence":"No flexible category-membership defense is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01L06","evidence":"No repeated counterexamples or boundary contractions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10","confidence":0.84,"reason":"The office assembled the export while defending the award, and external reviewers lack the original contextual evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10R01L01","evidence":"The procurement office produced the exported history and is defending the challenged award using it.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10R01L02","evidence":"The appeal file strips the original portal screens that showed assignment, requisition, and approval-authority evidence.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10R02L01","evidence":"The procurement office produced the exported history and is defending the challenged award using it.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10R02L02","evidence":"No prior internal checks or builder signoffs missing defects are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C10R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns procurement authority and context, not rights, duties, liberties, or remedies.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L01","evidence":"No proposal claims to protect a right or freedom.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L02","evidence":"No positive and negative obligation conflation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L03","evidence":"No collision of rights claims is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L04","evidence":"No permission system encoding substantive entitlement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L05","evidence":"No public-interest restriction justification is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L06","evidence":"No formal power with unclear review path is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L07","evidence":"No protected liberty lacking capability or access is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L08","evidence":"No rhetorical rights claim lacking a duty bearer or remedy is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01L09","evidence":"No accumulating exceptions to a right or freedom are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No reuse-rights, adoption, or dependency-version facts are supplied.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12R01L01","evidence":"No repeated permission negotiation for reuse is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12R02L01","evidence":"No unclear reuse rights or adoption block is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12R03L01","evidence":"No downstream reuse or version-drift dependency risk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C12R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13","confidence":0.88,"reason":"Relevant states changed and the portal provides substantial observability, but a complete earlier-check/later-action sequence is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not establish a specific later action that depends on an earlier check or decision.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13R01L02","evidence":"The requisition changed stages and the assigned buyer transferred divisions, changing relevant state.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13R01L03","evidence":"Comments existed before and after stage changes, but no check-to-action interval is specifically established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13R01L04","evidence":"Using approval after changed role, authority, or workflow state can affect the protested award's fairness and integrity.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13R01L05","evidence":"The original portal exposed requisition, assignment, approving authority, and workflow-state information.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q966CE580CC36"}