{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C01","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario establishes scheduled movement and containment goals, but not threshold readiness dynamics.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C01R01L01","evidence":"No threshold-crossing requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C01R01L02","evidence":"No partial-readiness state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C01R01L03","evidence":"Scheduled handoffs exist, but they are not stated to convert readiness into action.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C02","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a tacit-expectations failure or the stated encounter structure.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C02R01L01","evidence":"Matches and handoffs are described, but a recognizable recurring encounter structure is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C02R01L02","evidence":"No joint dependence on roles, props, cues, conditions, and order is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C02R01L03","evidence":"The initial player-community explanation is contradicted, but differing tacit expectations are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C03","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The defect is carried by one non-replicating process and affects only its current shard.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C03R01L01","evidence":"The defect belongs to one broadcast process that never creates copies.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C03R01L02","evidence":"Only the shard currently hosting the single process is affected; no concurrent shared-state access is described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C03R01L03","evidence":"The behavior is sequential reassignment on a fixed timetable, not uncontrolled concurrent interleaving.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C03R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The containment requirements and final handoff constrain routing, but the additional decomposition conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R01L01","evidence":"The process location, handoff schedule, exhibition-shard limit, championship exclusion, and disappearance requirement are coupled constraints.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R01L02","evidence":"The final scheduled handoff and championship exclusion constrain earlier routing choices.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R01L03","evidence":"No teams or uncertain independent boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R02L01","evidence":"The process location, handoff schedule, exhibition-shard limit, championship exclusion, and disappearance requirement are coupled constraints.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R02L02","evidence":"The final scheduled handoff and championship exclusion constrain earlier routing choices.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R02L03","evidence":"Violations are visible quickly through operations logs and live telemetry; late discovery is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R03L01","evidence":"The process location, handoff schedule, exhibition-shard limit, championship exclusion, and disappearance requirement are coupled constraints.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R03L02","evidence":"The final scheduled handoff and championship exclusion constrain earlier routing choices.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R03L03","evidence":"No cycles, shared resources, or unsafe decomposition are established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R04L01","evidence":"The final scheduled handoff and championship exclusion constrain earlier routing choices.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R04L02","evidence":"No redundant representations or equivalent parameterizations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C04R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario explicitly describes a single non-replicating process with one affected shard at a time.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01L01","evidence":"The defect is carried by one process and only its currently hosting shard is affected.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01L02","evidence":"The process never creates copies.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01L03","evidence":"No coordination decision during delay or partition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01L04","evidence":"Invalidated results show a correctness consequence, but user dependence on the listed shared-state invariants is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01L05","evidence":"No consistency mechanism or advertised consistency level is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01L06","evidence":"There are no replicas, and the effect on match results is explicitly described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C05R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C06","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The scenario explicitly says the process never creates copies, so there are no described replicas requiring such a contract.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C06R01L01","evidence":"The process never creates copies and only one shard hosts it at a time.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C06R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No training, evaluation, prediction, or reconstruction workflow is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R01L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R01L02","evidence":"No indexed decision dataset is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R02L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R02L02","evidence":"No predictor or target-derived features are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R03L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R03L02","evidence":"No training, preprocessing, validation, or test procedure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R04L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R04L02","evidence":"No random data splitting is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R05L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R05L02","evidence":"No benchmark, test suite, rubric, or answer key is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R06L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R06L02","evidence":"No retrospective artifact presented for an earlier decision time is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R06L03","evidence":"No retrospective or deployment-time input comparison is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R07L01","evidence":"No temporal or evaluation firewall crossing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R07L02","evidence":"Operations logs identify the current shard, transfer time, and next destination.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C07R07","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario states containment requirements but provides no proof or evidence that they are jointly infeasible.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R01L01","evidence":"No proof or exhaustive validated infeasibility analysis is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R02L01","evidence":"No competing designs or failed integrated design is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R03L01","evidence":"No three-guarantee pick-any-two impossibility is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R04L01","evidence":"No pairwise compatibility check or full-set inconsistency is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R05L01","evidence":"No empty feasible region is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R06L01","evidence":"No divergent local exceptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C08R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C09","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The process moves through an observable ordered shard sequence, but no yield deficit or downstream-attrition behavior is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C09R01L01","evidence":"One broadcast process is reassigned through a fixed sequence of regional shards before the required final disappearance.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C09R01L02","evidence":"No expected-versus-actual yield, conversion, retention, throughput, or quality comparison is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C09R01L03","evidence":"Logs identify current shard, exact transfer time, and next destination; telemetry confirms the boundary within minutes.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C09R01L04","evidence":"No local-stage improvement or downstream attrition displacement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No dimensional design, scaling, or ratio-system issue is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C10R01L01","evidence":"No relative dimensions or visual hierarchy are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C10R01L02","evidence":"No design translation across physical or product contexts is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C10R01L03","evidence":"No hand-tuned sizes or local sizing exceptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C10R01L04","evidence":"No formal ratio system is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The defect advances through identifiable regional shards with observable timing, consequential arrival times, differentiated destinations, and explicit containment behavior.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11R01L01","evidence":"The malfunction appears in a sequence of regional shards as the process is reassigned.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11R01L02","evidence":"Logs identify current shard, exact transfer time, and next destination; telemetry confirms the affected boundary within minutes.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11R01L03","evidence":"Arrival before roster lock can invalidate results, while arrival after standings close has little consequence.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11R01L04","evidence":"Upcoming shards vary between casual exhibitions, championship-bracket feeds, and a youth league with limited overnight staff.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11R01L05","evidence":"Leadership specifies no farther than remaining exhibition shards, never either championship shard, and disappearance after the final exhibition handoff.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C11R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario describes a moving defect and containment policy, not an explicit feasible-outcome envelope or latent-capacity deficit analysis.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01L01","evidence":"A scoring malfunction is observed, but no relevant possible-outcome set is discussed.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01L02","evidence":"No suspected gap to latent capacity or attainable practice is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01L03","evidence":"No aspirational, comparative, remembered, or political outcome standard is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01L04","evidence":"No combined deficit of losses, bottlenecks, exclusions, and missed options is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01L05","evidence":"No multistage realized-output loss analysis is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01L06","evidence":"No alternative feasible baselines or constraint assumptions are compared.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario describes scheduled movement of one process, not fault-tolerant multi-participant agreement.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01L01","evidence":"No participants proposing or acknowledging a shared decision value are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01L02","evidence":"No conflicting correct participants deciding a logical value are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01L03","evidence":"No independently failing decision participants or communication paths are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01L04","evidence":"No decision-persistence requirement across retry, leadership change, or recovery is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01L05","evidence":"No availability-versus-consistency partition tradeoff is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01L06","evidence":"No changing membership, votes, or log entries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14Q9FC9156602E6"}