{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish multiple variants, comparative selection, or experimental-clutter conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01L01","evidence":"Only one newly introduced packaging type is described; several variants or pilots are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01L02","evidence":"No evidence describes comparing alternatives or lacking an agreed selection frame.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01L03","evidence":"No experimentation-learning process or failure to institutionalize learning is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01L04","evidence":"Aisle differences are mentioned, but multiple local adaptations solving similar problems are not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01L05","evidence":"No accumulation of experimental product or process clutter is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01L06","evidence":"No stakeholder disagreement over variant success criteria is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC01R01}]},{","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not establish a less-visible support layer that depletes independently of demand.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L02","evidence":"No private, underground, backstage, or slowly changing support layer is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L03","evidence":"Reserve consumption, backlog, trust loss, slack depletion, or substrate depletion is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L04","evidence":"No collapse threshold for a hidden support layer is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L05","evidence":"No stakeholder inference from absent surface failure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L06","evidence":"No evidence establishes that repair becomes harder after a support deficit becomes visible.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01L07","evidence":"No incentives to preserve surface appearance while postponing support repair are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario describes a worsening local control loop, not substitution or transfer of a hazard across a control boundary.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L01","evidence":"No substitution across sites, channels, actors, targets, or times is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L02","evidence":"The control adjusts dehumidification; it is not established as blocking or transferring one manifestation.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L03","evidence":"No persistent source or pressure after a local blocking control is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L04","evidence":"No destination zones with differing controls or monitoring are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L05","evidence":"No protected-zone versus downstream ownership boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L06","evidence":"No adaptive hazard producers are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L07","evidence":"No short evaluation window or delayed transfer is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01L08","evidence":"The wall/carton measurement mismatch is not established as an intervention boundary that legacy measurement cannot cross.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04","confidence":0.94,"reason":"A reinforcing harmful trajectory is evidenced, but the required stable-state geometry is not.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R01L01","evidence":"Repeated worsening controller cycles are described, but resets or reforms decaying back into the same pattern are not.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R02L01","evidence":"No evidence shows small starting-state differences producing qualitatively different long-run outcomes.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R02L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R03L01","evidence":"No population or organization coordinating on an inferior stable convention is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R03L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R04L01","evidence":"No distinct recovery threshold is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R04L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R05L01","evidence":"No multiple optima, stable cycles, regimes, or equilibria are established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R05L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R06L01","evidence":"Preservation requirements are specified, but a desired state's inaccessible or undersized basin is not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R06L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R07L01","evidence":"Each control cycle produces more ice and condensation, enlarging the harmful condition through feedback.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R07L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC04R07","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC05","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario shows misleading measurements, but not documentary/self-attested effectiveness evidence, omitted operational constraints, and compensating operator workarounds.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC05R01L01","evidence":"Favorable wall-sensor readings are described, but documentary, self-attested, or control-owner-produced evidence of effectiveness is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC05R01L02","evidence":"No actual-work conditions such as handoffs, exceptions, time pressure, or degraded tooling omitted by a nominal procedure are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC05R01L03","evidence":"No operator workarounds, tacit expertise, informal coordination, or exception paths are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No decaying, partially missing context bundle is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01L01","evidence":"No bundle-dependent meaning is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01L02","evidence":"No components decaying at different rates are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01L03","evidence":"No survivor of a decayed bundle is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01L04","evidence":"No lost component changing a message's sign or valence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01L05","evidence":"No uncoupled refresh or expiry process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01L06","evidence":"No observers missing contextual bundle information are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Carton humidity is increasingly beyond specification, but threshold operating regimes and threshold-based procedure changes are not evidenced.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07R01L01","evidence":"No small change near a boundary producing outsized consequences is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07R01L02","evidence":"No evidence characterizes a proportional response as underreacting near crisis and overreacting elsewhere.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07R01L03","evidence":"No distinguishable operating regimes separated by response thresholds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07R01L04","evidence":"Humidity inside sealed cartons is rising farther above its specified preservation range, with mold losses and rejected pallets increasing.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07R01L05","evidence":"No absence of explicit rules for changing authority, resources, or methods is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Repeated storage cycles already produce nonzero mold loss and rejected pallets, which are material adverse outcomes.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC08R01L01","evidence":"The warehouse repeatedly holds and distributes product, and mold losses and rejected pallets are climbing.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC08R01L02","evidence":"Mold losses and rejected pallets are already occurring, establishing nonzero adverse-outcome probability in operation.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC08R01L03","evidence":"A mold loss or rejected pallet is a material product-loss outcome.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC08R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC09","confidence":0.93,"reason":"Vent obstruction and net ice accumulation are evidenced, but sharply rising interface cost with coverage is not.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC09R01L01","evidence":"Ice around vents alters airflow, establishing that the vent pathway must remain clear for its function.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC09R01L02","evidence":"Ice accumulates around vents and is not a work input, functioning as an opportunistic deposit.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC09R01L03","evidence":"The scenario states that airflow is altered, but does not establish tolerated small occupation followed by sharply rising interface cost with coverage.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC09R01L04","evidence":"Ice is accumulating around vents, indicating deposition exceeds ordinary removal.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario shows compounding measurement/control error, not the specified multiscale susceptibility and cascade indicators.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R01L01","evidence":"No abrupt or disproportionate change tied to load, density, coupling, synchronization, or resource pressure is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R01L02","evidence":"No local perturbation with cross-scale or system-wide effects is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R01L03","evidence":"No correlation, variance, heavy-tail, recovery-time, or cascade-size trend is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R01L04","evidence":"No evidence says existing threshold rules are too crude for a rising-susceptibility regime.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R02L01","evidence":"No abrupt or disproportionate change tied to the listed system pressures is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R02L02","evidence":"No correlation, variance, heavy-tail, recovery-time, or cascade-size trend is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R02L03","evidence":"Wall readings and carton checks disagree, but not as local versus network or long-range synchronization indicators.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R03L01","evidence":"No abrupt or disproportionate change tied to the listed system pressures is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R03L02","evidence":"No local perturbation with cross-scale or system-wide effects is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R03L03","evidence":"No alternation between inert stability and sudden cascades is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC10R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Carton humidity drifts farther from specification because each controller correction worsens the next cycle's discrepancy and condensation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC11R01L01","evidence":"Humidity inside sealed cartons rises farther above specification each week, moving away from preservation requirements.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC11R01L02","evidence":"Longer dehumidifier cycles create colder surfaces and more condensation inside the packages, worsening the controlled condition.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC11R01L03","evidence":"Ordinary aisle differences have become a consistent week-over-week shift toward wetter cartons.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC11R01L04","evidence":"Each cycle begins with a larger measurement discrepancy and leaves more ice and condensation for the next cycle.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC11R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC12","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No growing stock with a shared, capacity-limited later clearance burden is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC12R01L01","evidence":"The feedback loop worsens over cycles, but rapid reinforcing growth with delayed feedback and overshoot before control response is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC12R01L02","evidence":"No growing stock later converting exits, deaths, defaults, decomposition, retirement, or obsolescence into work is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC12R01L03","evidence":"No primary support or secondary clearance capacity constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC12R01L04","evidence":"No common unwind causing correlated peak demand on shared clearance capacity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not describe bulk performance governed by internal void geometry or evolving porosity.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC13R01L01","evidence":"No bulk behavior dependent on internal void volume or geometry is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC13R01L02","evidence":"No void connectivity, throat size, accessibility, or orientation effect is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC13R01L03","evidence":"No post-creation porosity change from manufacture, loading, fouling, swelling, or aging is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC13R01L04","evidence":"No heterogeneous multiscale microstructure or unrepresentative local material measurement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894DC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QA0A01E1F894D"}