{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario does not establish the required modal-scope, distinction, inconsistency, boundary-case, or conflation conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01R01L01","evidence":"No dispute over modal terms is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01R01L02","evidence":"No decision requiring distinctions among necessity, constraint, duty, contingency, or custom is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01R01L03","evidence":"Several response sequences are documented, but inconsistent variation of background facts is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that necessary boundary cases are absent.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01R01L05","evidence":"No conflation of the listed state categories is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C02","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The described strategic decision does not establish the required staged-yield process conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C02R01L01","evidence":"No population or item stream moving through ordered stages toward an outcome is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C02R01L02","evidence":"No lower-than-expected yield, conversion, retention, throughput, or quality is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C02R01L03","evidence":"Responses and choices are documented, but the specified stage-transition instrumentation is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C02R01L04","evidence":"No local-stage improvement or downstream attrition displacement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03","confidence":0.97,"reason":"Close estimates across strategic sequences do not establish the route's sequential-search and decision-closure conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L01","evidence":"No expanding option comparison with diminishing decision improvement is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L02","evidence":"No infeasible global-optimum determination is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L03","evidence":"No sequential candidate-arrival process or material delay cost is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L04","evidence":"No use of “good enough” without a shared threshold is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L05","evidence":"No growing requirements after viable options appear are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L06","evidence":"Division among staff is described, but repeated reopening caused by absent closure rules is not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L07","evidence":"No first-fit rule or order dependence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01L08","evidence":"No proxy optimization degrading the listed values is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C04","confidence":0.88,"reason":"Opponent adaptation makes the relevant game state not fully fixed in advance, and the team has documented response repertoires and follow-on choices.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C04R01L01","evidence":"The rival can observe the alignment and adapt personnel, instructions, and ball-handler choices after play begins.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C04R01L02","evidence":"Staff have documented opponent responses, the team's follow-on choices, and assigned coverages, evidencing an available practiced repertoire.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C04R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The decision concerns one deciding game rather than a recurring classification or verification question.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L01","evidence":"The scenario is a one-game strategic choice, not a recurring yes/no classification, approval, eligibility, verification, diagnosis, compliance, or proof question.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L02","evidence":"No demand for an automatic, repeatable, finite answer for all cases is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L03","evidence":"No unclear or expanding input space, encoding, predicate, or scope boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L04","evidence":"No case requiring unbounded search, future evidence, semantic interpretation, human judgment, or external authority is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L05","evidence":"No indefinite loop, escalation, timeout, or arbitrary default is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L06","evidence":"No edge-case disagreement about correctness, completeness, or scope is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01L07","evidence":"No claim that the question becomes decidable through the listed changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C05R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario contains strategic planning, not an argument by contradiction with stated premises and contradiction-recognition rules.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C06R01L01","evidence":"No negation or derivation from a negated assumption is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C06R01L02","evidence":"No accepted premise base or proof axioms are specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C06R01L03","evidence":"No precisely recognized contradiction, violated invariant, empty case set, or unsatisfiable constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C06R01L04","evidence":"No reasoning rule permitting rejection after contradiction is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07","confidence":0.93,"reason":"A prior film result is mentioned, but the route's latent-capacity, baseline, and multistage-deficit conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01L01","evidence":"Yesterday's film segment is an observed result, and no complete feasible-outcome set is made explicit.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01L02","evidence":"No suspected gap between current output and latent capacity or reachable alternatives is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01L03","evidence":"No outcome standard based on aspiration, comparison, memory, or politics is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01L04","evidence":"No lumping of losses, bottlenecks, exclusions, missed options, and capacities into one deficit is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01L05","evidence":"No multistage realized-output loss process is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01L06","evidence":"No same realized outcome is evaluated under differing feasible baselines or constraint assumptions.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No statistical data, formal model assumptions, or sensitivity results are described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R01L01","evidence":"No data-generating process or parametric model is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R01L02","evidence":"No formal conclusion dependent on a model assumption is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R02L01","evidence":"No sample characteristics or outliers are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R02L02","evidence":"No formal conclusion dependent on a model assumption is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R03L01","evidence":"No formal result under varied assumptions or outlier handling is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R04L01","evidence":"No default statistical method is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R04L02","evidence":"No formal conclusion dependent on a model assumption is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R05L01","evidence":"No exploratory pattern and confirmatory strong model are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R05L02","evidence":"No formal conclusion dependent on a model assumption is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C08R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09","confidence":0.91,"reason":"Risk and sequence estimates are discussed, but the required conditional-probability and denominator conditions are not fully established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01L01","evidence":"The scenario states fouling risks and notes that estimates across sequences are close.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01L02","evidence":"The estimates concern documented opponent-response scenarios and the team's follow-on choices.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01L03","evidence":"No potential confusion among marginal, joint, posterior, or conditional probabilities is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01L04","evidence":"Estimates are compared across plausible opponent-response sequences.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01L05","evidence":"No context-defined population denominator is specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01L06","evidence":"No decision about updating a prior from unstated evidence context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C10","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario rejects relying on a favorable forecast or compliance sign-off, but does not state an implication or eliminate an option from a missing consequence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C10R01L01","evidence":"No forward implication, requirement, invariant, rule, model, or dependency is stated as P implies Q.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C10R01L02","evidence":"No missing trace, symptom, artifact, approval, transition, output, or condition is used to justify elimination.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C11","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No presentation-order or chronology problem is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C11R01L01","evidence":"No underlying chronology is contrasted with an audience encounter order.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C11R01L02","evidence":"No temporal jumps, omissions, reinterpretation, or multiple timelines affecting perceived causality are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The stated goal is a one-game tactical decision, not theory-building or model refinement.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01L01","evidence":"The goal is deciding whether to deploy a full-court press in a playoff game, not theory-building or model refinement.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01L02","evidence":"No sequential selection of cases is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01L03","evidence":"No current model with unresolved structure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01L04","evidence":"No comparison of learning value across selectable cases is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01L05","evidence":"No representativeness criterion is discussed.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01L06","evidence":"No assessment of saturation or diminishing learning is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C12R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QA469524B7221C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The rival observes and adapts to the press, and the staff explicitly reject static, optimistic, compliance-based, and single-favorable-forecast approval reasoning.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C13R01L01","evidence":"The rival can observe the alignment, relay instructions, change receivers, and substitute after observing possessions.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QA469524B7221C13R01L02","evidence":"The coach refuses approval based on a short favorable segment or coverage compliance, and no single favorable forecast is sufficient.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QA469524B7221C13R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QA469524B7221"}