{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario describes inconsistent classification of household members, not multi-resource circular blocking.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01L01","evidence":"No actor is described acquiring multiple resources, permissions, locks, commitments, or approvals.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01L02","evidence":"No scarce or exclusive resource is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01L03","evidence":"No differing acquisition orders are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01L04","evidence":"No release, rollback, timeout, or preemption process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01L05","evidence":"No mutual hostage-taking through negotiation, approval, or governance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01L06","evidence":"No circular blocking under contention or crisis is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02","confidence":0.91,"reason":"Competing household definitions support several unity criteria, but overlapping or nested wholes are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02R01L01","evidence":"The portal treats listed people as a household roster that governs eligibility calculations.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02R01L02","evidence":"Applicants, tax-form-oriented caseworkers, and legal reviewers disagree about who composes the household.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02R01L03","evidence":"Ordinary occupancy, tax-return inclusion, and documented residence rights are competing relations for composing the household.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02R01L04","evidence":"The same potential residents are treated differently under ordinary-occupancy, tax, and legal-residency criteria.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02R01L05","evidence":"The scenario does not establish nested or overlapping wholes as the source of ambiguous boundaries or accountability.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario concerns inconsistent terminology, not authorization by an autonomous holder.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01L01","evidence":"Applicants provide roster information, but no voluntary authorization to act within an autonomous holder's domain is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01L02","evidence":"Different interpretations are described, but not materially unequal information relevant to an authorization decision.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01L03","evidence":"No power or dependency imbalance affecting voluntariness is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01L04","evidence":"No proposed authorization with complex scope, reuse, risk, or downstream consequences is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01L05","evidence":"No authorization validity, review, or revocation over time is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01L06","evidence":"No representative or proxy authorization is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No recurring transferable role or position is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01L01","evidence":"No recurring position occupied by different actors across time is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01L02","evidence":"No role-holder behavioral expectations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01L03","evidence":"No title, office, job, slot, niche, or function with an unclear behavioral bundle is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01L04","evidence":"No position-based authority, obligation, access, accountability, or support is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01L05","evidence":"No role performance depending on tacit norms is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01L06","evidence":"No turnover or transferability failure of a role is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish an agent-principal funding divergence or insulated resource stream.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05R01L01","evidence":"The housing department administers assistance, but no stated principal, mandate, or beneficiary relationship of the specified kind is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05R01L02","evidence":"No distinct funding party, rent stream, captive channel, or automatic allocation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05R01L03","evidence":"Complaints are described, but weak exit, voice, review power, or renewal conditioning is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05R01L04","evidence":"No evidence compares satisfying funders or metrics with satisfying affected people.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05R01L05","evidence":"No stable or insulated resource stream supporting goal drift is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No deputy authority or cross-boundary request path is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC06R01L01","evidence":"No intermediary with greater authority than request originators is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC06R01L02","evidence":"No unauthorized actor initiating, replaying, forwarding, embedding, or disguising requests is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC06R01L03","evidence":"No deputy, ambient credential, channel trust, or request-specific authorization is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC06R01L04","evidence":"No cross-boundary request path losing origin or authority context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The identical portal heading and help text is confidently interpreted differently by applicants, caseworkers, and legal reviewers.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC07R01L01","evidence":"Applicants, caseworkers, and legal reviewers interpret “household member” differently despite receiving identical text.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC07R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Household-member classification affects eligibility, but the Boolean composition and refutation requirements are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01L01","evidence":"Eligibility calculations depend on whether people are classified as “household members.”","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01L02","evidence":"The operative meaning is disputed across groups, with each applying a different understanding of the term.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01L03","evidence":"Consistent eligibility administration requires a reusable determination of who is a household member.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01L04","evidence":"Roster differences alter income totals, bedroom allowances, and supporting-record requests, making classification errors materially consequential.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01L05","evidence":"The scenario does not describe Boolean, quantifier, threshold, or exception composition of the condition.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01L06","evidence":"No requirement to expose observations that would refute a claim is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario concerns roster definitions, not a discrete coupled choice method.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09R01L01","evidence":"No options are described as indivisible or all-or-nothing.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09R01L02","evidence":"No set of choices interacting through shared constraints is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09R01L03","evidence":"No whole-number quantities, slots, or commitments are required by the scenario.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish binding fairness, eligibility, compatibility, or exclusion constraints among choices.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09R01L05","evidence":"No fractional, smoothly ranked, or one-at-a-time treatment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC10","confidence":0.96,"reason":"A rental unit is mentioned, but the operational site-state and occupant-fit structure is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC10R01L01","evidence":"The scenario refers to a unit, but does not establish a host position remaining identifiable through changes of occupants.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC10R01L02","evidence":"No site constraints or affordances independent of occupants are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC10R01L03","evidence":"Vacancy, assignment, release, and turnover are not described as meaningful states.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC10R01L04","evidence":"No assignments based on fit between an occupant and a constrained site are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario reports divergent meanings of a portal term, not quantified claims with inadequate evidentiary support.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R01L01","evidence":"No claim in the scenario contains an explicit scope quantifier over cases.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R01L02","evidence":"No quantified claim domain is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R01L03","evidence":"No evidentiary support burden created by a claim quantifier is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R02L01","evidence":"The portal label is not presented as an unquantified grammatical claim inviting a quantified interpretation.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R02L02","evidence":"No quantified claim domain is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R02L03","evidence":"No evidentiary support burden created by a claim quantifier is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R02","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R03L01","evidence":"No claim in the scenario contains an explicit scope quantifier over cases.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R03L02","evidence":"No comparison among quantified claims across distinct domains is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R03L03","evidence":"No evidentiary support burden created by a claim quantifier is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R03","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R04L01","evidence":"The portal label is not presented as an unquantified grammatical claim inviting a quantified interpretation.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R04L02","evidence":"No comparison among quantified claims across distinct domains is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R04L03","evidence":"No evidentiary support burden created by a claim quantifier is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC11R04","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC12","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Temporary absence is mentioned, but no socially meaningful transition requiring explicit marking is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC12R01L01","evidence":"No person or group is described as moving between statuses, roles, memberships, or identities.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC12R01L02","evidence":"No emotional, symbolic, ethical, or social weight beyond logistics is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC12R01L03","evidence":"No transition-related ambiguity, shame, drift, exclusion, or indefinite in-betweenness is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC13","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Household-member status is assigned through occupancy, tax, and residency associations, but insufficiency of association itself is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC13R01L01","evidence":"Household-member status is assigned using relations such as ordinary occupancy, tax-return inclusion, and a documented right to reside.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC13R01L02","evidence":"The relevant pathway is disputed because groups apply incompatible criteria to the same label.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC13R01L03","evidence":"The scenario establishes inconsistency, but does not establish that an associative link itself fails to warrant property transfer in the decision at issue.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB146479BBD7CC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QB146479BBD7C"}