{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC01","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario establishes a time-limited high-fidelity practice opportunity, but not comparative evidence that the same input has different acquisition effects across receiver states or times.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC01R01L01","evidence":"No longitudinal or comparative evidence shows materially different acquisition effects from the same input across time or receiving-system state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC01R01L02","evidence":"Dependable operational knowledge concerns restoration experiences, uncommon alarms, and switching errors rather than automatic maturation.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC01R01L03","evidence":"The segregated simulator is available for six hours and the high-resolution history is downsampled the following morning.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC01R01L04","evidence":"After the interval, the available event history is downsampled, reducing replay fidelity.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The event path matters for reproducing consequential behavior, but the other record-model requirements are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01L01","evidence":"The historian preserves order and dependencies needed to reproduce consequential system behavior.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01L02","evidence":"No independent entity-centric records, record drift, overwriting, or manual reconciliation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01L03","evidence":"No corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that recurring entities and transformations cannot be represented as static attributes.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01L05","evidence":"Millisecond timestamps and preserved dependencies are described, but partial, source-local, uncertain, or distinct causal ordering is not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01L06","evidence":"No current-state views or their authority and rebuildability are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly provides a captured restoration trace and a segregated, time-limited simulator for safe post-event replay.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC03R01L01","evidence":"A live restoration event produces commands, acknowledgements, trips, topology changes, and frequency responses in sequence.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC03R01L02","evidence":"The historian preserves the event stream, order, and dependencies needed to reproduce consequential behavior, and the simulator accepts it.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC03R01L03","evidence":"Recreating the stressed live network could extend outages, damage equipment, endanger crews, and would contend with unrelated live telemetry.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC03R01L04","evidence":"For six hours after restoration work, a segregated simulator can rerun the high-resolution historian stream before later downsampling.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC03R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC04","confidence":0.97,"reason":"Lack of dependable learning is described, but neither reduced malleability nor insufficiency of ordinary training is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC04R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not distinguish stabilized reduced malleability from limited exposure to uncommon events, access, dose, or practice.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC04R01L02","evidence":"No ordinary training or compensation effort, its predicted insufficiency, or a risk-benefit comparison is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC05","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Storm restoration is a phased recovery from outage with risks from incorrect reentry, but the possible recovery endpoints are not specified.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC05R01L01","evidence":"Restoration work follows storms, and an erroneous operation could extend an outage.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC05R01L02","evidence":"Recovery requires a sequence of breaker closures, transfers, voltage adjustments, and load pickups.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC05R01L03","evidence":"The scenario does not specify whether recovery endpoints include baseline, minimum, partial, or transformed function.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC05R01L04","evidence":"A mistaken restoration operation could extend outage, damage equipment, or endanger field crews.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"High-resolution history is retained temporarily, but progressive retained-load dynamics and threshold harm are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC06R01L01","evidence":"No added inputs are said to progressively concentrate because clearance is slow or incomplete.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC06R01L02","evidence":"No failure of event-level monitoring to reveal retained-load location, ownership, or magnitude is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC06R01L03","evidence":"No accumulated-load threshold mechanism for harm is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC06R01L04","evidence":"The historian retains event history temporarily, but it is not established as a reservoir retaining the relevant load.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario describes risky operations but does not establish threshold operating regimes, an approaching boundary, or response-switch rules.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07R01L01","evidence":"No boundary-near small input changes with outsized consequences are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07R01L02","evidence":"No proportional-response policy or its underreaction and overreaction pattern is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07R01L03","evidence":"No distinguishable operating regimes separated by response thresholds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07R01L04","evidence":"No target variable is stated to be approaching a consequential capacity or other boundary.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07R01L05","evidence":"No procedures or absence of explicit authority, resource, or method switching rules is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish coordinated reduced-mode units, interdependent readiness, or staged return constraints.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC08R01L01","evidence":"Dozens of substations emit alarms, but they are not described as isolated, paused, degraded, or held in reduced mode.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC08R01L02","evidence":"No local readiness evaluations or dependencies on other units and shared return resources are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC08R01L03","evidence":"No premature reentry by one unit harming another or exhausting a shared buffer is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC08R01L04","evidence":"No inability to test full return at once is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Event dependencies are recorded, but feedback delays, recurrence, unknown lags, and competing explanations are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09R01L01","evidence":"The scenario records dependencies, but does not establish repeatedly recurring outcomes responding to earlier states or interventions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09R01L02","evidence":"No delayed feedback relation or resulting overreaction, underreaction, oscillation, or policy resistance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09R01L03","evidence":"No recurrent state or event pattern with unknown operative lag is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09R01L04","evidence":"No need to distinguish recurrence from seasonality, measurement delay, or a shared upstream cause is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09R01L05","evidence":"No plausible immediate, medium, long-tail, or event-reset memory horizons are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No reinforcing growth, stock unwind, finite clearance capacity, or correlated clearance peak is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC10R01L01","evidence":"No rapid reinforcing growth with delayed feedback and overshoot is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC10R01L02","evidence":"No growing stock later creating material clearance work is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC10R01L03","evidence":"No primary support or secondary clearance capacity is described as finite or slow to replenish.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC10R01L04","evidence":"No common unwind or tail-correlated peak demand on shared clearance capacity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not describe a consolidated trunk followed by heterogeneous endpoint completion or a throughput-completion gap.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC11R01L01","evidence":"No high-volume consolidated trunk carrying upstream flow is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC11R01L02","evidence":"No terminal branching into many low-volume heterogeneous endpoints is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC11R01L03","evidence":"No endpoint completion requirement for local access, timing, adaptation, custody, assistance, or verification is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC11R01L04","evidence":"No comparison of upstream throughput with verified endpoint completion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No described route establishes abrupt susceptibility behavior together with the additional cross-scale, precursor, or cascade evidence required.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R01L01","evidence":"No abrupt or disproportionate change as load, coupling, stress, or resource pressure changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R01L02","evidence":"No local perturbation producing cross-scale or system-wide effects is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R01L03","evidence":"No growth in correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size near a boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R01L04","evidence":"No existing threshold rules or their inadequacy for rising susceptibility are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R02L01","evidence":"No abrupt or disproportionate change as load, coupling, stress, or resource pressure changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R02L02","evidence":"No growth in correlation, variance, heavy-tailed events, recovery time, or cascade size near a boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R02L03","evidence":"No disagreement between local and network, aggregate, or long-range indicators is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R03L01","evidence":"No abrupt or disproportionate change as load, coupling, stress, or resource pressure changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R03L02","evidence":"No local perturbation producing cross-scale or system-wide effects is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R03L03","evidence":"No alternation between inert stability and sudden cascades is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC12R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Continuous telemetry is mentioned, but the specified event-coded carrier and receiver decoding properties are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01L01","evidence":"Continuous telemetry is mentioned, but the relevant source quantity is not characterized as graded, probabilistic, or finer than a categorical event.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01L02","evidence":"No stereotyped unit-event carrier whose identities lack magnitude information is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01L03","evidence":"No receiver is described as observing event timing or count rather than direct source magnitude.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01L04","evidence":"No stochastic or intermittent event arrivals and their effect on magnitude estimation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01L05","evidence":"No receiver speed-confidence tradeoff from accumulating events is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01L06","evidence":"No high-rate saturation or low-rate disappearance within a decoding window is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB51D982580FCC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QB51D982580FC"}