{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No scenario evidence establishes a multidimensional product-space design or its stated coverage constraints.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes two exactly crosswalked classification lists, not a multidimensional decision space.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01L02","evidence":"No factorial design, scenario cube, option matrix, catalog, or combinatorial test plan is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01L03","evidence":"No coverage claim based on generated multidimensional cells is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01L04","evidence":"No infeasible, unsafe, disallowed, invalid, or redundant combinations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01L05","evidence":"No oversized product space or visible reduction or sampling rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01L06","evidence":"No axes or levels whose additions multiply a design space are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not concern control-effectiveness evidence or operational workarounds under nominal-procedure omissions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC02R01L01","evidence":"The logs concern incident evidence, not documentary or self-attested evidence of control effectiveness.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC02R01L02","evidence":"No load, time pressure, degraded tooling, handoff, or omitted local constraint is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC02R01L03","evidence":"No workarounds, tacit expertise, informal coordination, reserves, or exception paths are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Every route requires non-one-to-one participant and analyst categories, but the scenario explicitly establishes a complete exact one-to-one crosswalk.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R01L01","evidence":"Each depot term has exactly one engineering code, each engineering code exactly one depot equivalent, and neither list has an unmatched category.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R01L02","evidence":"The completed crosswalk is explicitly exact and independently applied without disputed classifications, rather than flattening native categories.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R02L01","evidence":"The scenario explicitly establishes a complete exact one-to-one crosswalk between the depot and engineering categories.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R02L02","evidence":"The analytics lead excludes depot-authored logs solely because they were written by employees, while identical details are admissible in outside-engineer reports.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R02","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R03L01","evidence":"The scenario explicitly establishes a complete exact one-to-one crosswalk between the depot and engineering categories.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R03L02","evidence":"The exact, complete, undisputed crosswalk contradicts a difference in meaning between the corresponding fault classifications.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R03","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R04L01","evidence":"The scenario explicitly establishes a complete exact one-to-one crosswalk between the depot and engineering categories.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R04L02","evidence":"The analysis excludes depot-authored logs, but no evidence establishes power or that the displacement's losses were unrecorded.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC03R04","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario gives no validation verdict controlled or benefited from by an artifact producer.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04R01L01","evidence":"No artifact producer's control of, or benefit from, a validation verdict is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04R01L02","evidence":"Independent reviewers applied the crosswalk, but the scenario does not establish whether affected external parties can inspect validity evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04R02L01","evidence":"No artifact producer's control of, or benefit from, a validation verdict is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04R02L02","evidence":"No prior internal check or builder signoff is described as having missed a consequential defect or exclusion.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC04R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Intermittent signaling failures are mentioned, but none of the specified latent-path, joint-configuration, or dependence evidence is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L01","evidence":"No hazard-to-target path through conditional safeguards, modes, permissions, or dependencies is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L02","evidence":"No rare joint configuration, maintenance state, timing overlap, retry, or override is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L03","evidence":"No one-factor-at-a-time test result or unsafe integrated behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L04","evidence":"No locally safe change completing a latent hazardous path is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L05","evidence":"No risk estimate or multiplication of marginal probabilities is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L06","evidence":"No redundant barriers or teams with shared dependencies are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01L07","evidence":"No higher-order interaction coverage issue is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish serial defensive layers, their failures, or a serious-harm trajectory.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L01","evidence":"No serious harm trajectory through several serial defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L02","evidence":"No defensive-layer bypass, degradation, overload, or open-path probability is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L03","evidence":"No shared source of dependence among defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L04","evidence":"No safety claim counting nominal layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L05","evidence":"No incident is described as traversing nominal controls along the same hazard trajectory.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L06","evidence":"No distributed cross-layer ownership issue is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01L07","evidence":"No rare catastrophic aligned failure or averaging issue is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The crosswalk is established as an exact complete bijection, but no requirement for it to remain exact through collection changes is given.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07R01L01","evidence":"The completed crosswalk explicitly shows exact correspondence between depot terms and engineering codes.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07R01L02","evidence":"Each depot term has one and only one engineering code, each code has one depot equivalent, and neither list has unmatched categories.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07R01L03","evidence":"Every engineering code has a depot equivalent and neither list contains an unmatched category.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07R01L04","evidence":"The stated exact complete one-to-one correspondence makes backward tracing and a full round trip well-defined.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07R01L05","evidence":"No additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames of either collection are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The lead asserts a systematic self-protective distortion and the logs have verified useful qualities, but the other reliability-structure conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not state that the receiver cannot directly inspect the incident reality reported in the logs.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08R01L02","evidence":"The analytics lead's stated reason is that repair employees' documents are inherently self-protective, alleging systematic distortion.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08R01L03","evidence":"Independent review found no fabrication, missing fields, or inconsistencies, and classifications were consistently verified.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish differing reliability among different parts of the accounts.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08R01L05","evidence":"No difference between telling order or framing and event or causal order is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns source-based exclusion of evidence, not a form or representation that structurally defeats intended use.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09R01L01","evidence":"No representation structure preventing intended understanding, use, or enactment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09R01L02","evidence":"No form copied from another context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09R01L03","evidence":"No divergence between an artifact's content and the inference or action caused by its structure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09R01L04","evidence":"No formal-compliance appearance hollowing out a function or obligation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09R01L05","evidence":"No aesthetic, procedural, or technical form treated as neutral is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No event-history architecture, reconciliation problem, or rebuildable current-state view is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01L01","evidence":"No need to use the path to present state for explanation, audit, recovery, or decision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01L02","evidence":"No independent entity-centric records drifting or requiring reconciliation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01L03","evidence":"No corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations preserving prior states are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01L04","evidence":"No issue representing recurring participants, roles, locations, or transformations as static attributes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01L05","evidence":"No partial, uncertain, source-local, or causal temporal ordering is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01L06","evidence":"No derived and rebuildable current-state view is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly establishes a one-to-one crosswalk, contradicting the required possibility that distinct sources map to the same target value.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC11R01L01","evidence":"No downstream consumer is described as treating one target value as unique evidence of a source, owner, request, record, resource, or state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC11R01L02","evidence":"The crosswalk explicitly gives each depot term one engineering code and each code one depot equivalent, with no unmatched categories.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC11R01L03","evidence":"No collision consequence such as merged histories, overwritten data, misrouted access, or ambiguity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC11R01L04","evidence":"No concurrent, random, multi-authority, truncated, or changing-namespace mapping process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC11R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario contains no self-reference, self-modifying governance, reflexive classification, or level-collapse evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01L01","evidence":"No statement, rule, model, category, or procedure makes a claim about its own truth, validity, authority, membership, completeness, or update conditions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01L02","evidence":"No system modifying the rules, monitors, permissions, or goals governing its future behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01L03","evidence":"No forecast, ranking, label, policy, or measurement changing the behavior it concerns is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01L04","evidence":"No category or set deciding whether it includes itself or its defining rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01L05","evidence":"No collapse of multiple levels of language, rule, authority, or representation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01L06","evidence":"No attempted fix producing regress or moving a contradiction to a hidden layer is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The source position affects the evidence-admission decision, but the required identity-claim verification and risk-scoping conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L01","evidence":"The logs are described as depot-authored, but no actor, object, record, or credential is described as asserting identity or origin.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L02","evidence":"The published failure analysis's decision to exclude or admit incident details depends on whether the account is depot-authored or from outside engineers.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L03","evidence":"No imitation, replay, substitution, theft, forgery, staleness, delegation, or nearby-entity confusion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L04","evidence":"No repeatable procedure for checking admissible identity or origin evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L05","evidence":"No balance between false acceptance and false rejection governed by risk, burden, fairness, or privacy is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L06","evidence":"No verdict scope involving freshness, capability, context, custody, trust anchor, or assurance level is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01L07","evidence":"No required legible identity-verdict state before a downstream system proceeds is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QB6145174557FC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QB6145174557F"}