{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"All stated timing, discounting, measurement-basis, and long-horizon conditions are explicit in the scenario.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01R01L01","evidence":"The barrier requires spending now and claims benefits over the next 55 years.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01R01L02","evidence":"The present appropriation is justified by future lower emergency spending, fewer closures, and avoided home losses.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01R01L03","evidence":"Pump contracts look cheaper at 6%, while the barrier ranks ahead at 2% or beyond a 25-year review.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01R01L04","evidence":"The workbook combines nominal 2026 bids, inflation-adjusted 2020 damage estimates, and index-linked maintenance costs without reconciliation.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01R01L05","evidence":"Losses after year 35, including harms to current children, contribute almost nothing under the current spreadsheet.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C01R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C02","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario supports increasing future lock-in risk, but not the remaining reversal-specific conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C02R01L01","evidence":"Repeated flooding may lock development into vulnerable areas and eventually force abandonment, indicating worsening reversibility over time.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C02R01L02","evidence":"No explicit physical, legal, strategic, or coordination threshold closing a return path is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C02R01L03","evidence":"No material delay between a reversal decision and its effective implementation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C02R01L04","evidence":"The scenario does not establish high forecast uncertainty or that waiting itself is a commitment.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C03","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Flooding is a hazard, but no continuing transported quantity or service-to-destination requirement is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C03R01L01","evidence":"Repeated flooding is described as causing damage and closures, but no currently used path for a flow is identified as blocked or unavailable.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C03R01L02","evidence":"The scenario does not state that a transported quantity or service must continue reaching a destination.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C04","confidence":0.97,"reason":"Only a possible optimization comparison is present; sacrifice, obligation, and repeated erosion are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C04R01L01","evidence":"Officials are comparing alternatives using costs and valuation assumptions, but explicit optimization pressure is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C04R01L02","evidence":"No hidden sacrifice is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C04R01L03","evidence":"No non-negotiable obligation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C04R01L04","evidence":"Repeated flooding is described, but repeated erosion of a specified obligation or value is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish fragmented local optimization or cross-boundary governance failures.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01L01","evidence":"No local units are described improving their own metrics while worsening end-to-end outcomes.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01L02","evidence":"Long-term flooding consequences are described, but interdependencies or feedback loops not fully seen by local actors are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01L03","evidence":"Responsibility fragmented across interacting parts is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01L04","evidence":"No local optimization transferring burden to another system part is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01L05","evidence":"No part-level incentives, budgets, metrics, or accountability rules are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01L06","evidence":"No necessary cross-boundary coordination or inadequate governance interface is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Potential flood harm and mitigation alternatives are described, but residual-harm governance conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not state that a defense has reduced but not eliminated harm.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01L02","evidence":"Multiple layers of defense are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01L03","evidence":"Different harm channels are listed, but their differing reversibility, measurability, bearers, horizons, or remedies are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01L04","evidence":"No stated need to distinguish preventable future harm from residual harm requiring current governance.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01L05","evidence":"The scenario does not establish that harmed parties, funders, responsible actors, and policy owners differ.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01L06","evidence":"No risk register or failure-to-handle actual residual damage is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No protected actor, behavioral response, or risk-shifting mechanism is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07R01L01","evidence":"No safeguard is stated to lower perceived downside for an actor choosing exposure.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07R01L02","evidence":"No post-protection increase in risky behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07R01L03","evidence":"No relevant actor's behavioral freedom after protection is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07R01L04","evidence":"No offset response or displaced harm caused by a local safety measure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07R01L05","evidence":"No protected actor is stated to capture upside while transferring downside.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No conserved quantity crossing a leakage or externalization boundary is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C08R01L01","evidence":"No quantity is stated to remain present or equivalent across conversion, handoff, storage, or reallocation.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C08R01L02","evidence":"No boundary is stated at which such a quantity could leak or be externalized.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario compares flood-protection approaches, not an obsolete incumbent and replacement transition.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09R01L01","evidence":"No incumbent technology or approach is explicitly described as obsolete.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09R01L02","evidence":"The barrier has claimed benefits, but material replacement value in an incumbent-replacement transition is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09R01L03","evidence":"No live dependencies are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09R01L04","evidence":"No indefinite dual-support arrangement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09R01L05","evidence":"No abrupt cutover is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C10","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The decision is a comparison of alternatives, not an evidenced partial-path search structure.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C10R01L01","evidence":"No candidate solution is represented as a sequence, tree, partial assignment, path, plan, or hypothesis chain.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C10R01L02","evidence":"No constraints or compatibility rules are stated to invalidate a partial path before a full solution.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C10R01L03","evidence":"No failed extension with earlier choices remaining valid is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11","confidence":0.93,"reason":"Future benefits and accumulating future harm are explicit, but the required short-term-bias and default conditions are not.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11R01L01","evidence":"The barrier's long-term benefits are stated, but it is not established that delay is caused by more vivid immediate costs.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11R01L02","evidence":"The county has an active choice between renewing contracts and building a barrier; inaction as the default is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11R01L03","evidence":"Barrier benefits occur through storms over 55 years and include damage likely to fall on residents who are now children.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11R01L04","evidence":"No short-term metrics, urgency, temptation, or emotion crowding out future value is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11R01L05","evidence":"Repeated flooding may lock development into vulnerable areas and eventually force neighborhoods to be abandoned.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No pathway activation barrier or competing-pathway acceleration risk is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C12R01L01","evidence":"No repeatable pathway barrier or activation cost is identified as the main delay.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C12R01L02","evidence":"No competing pathways or harmful non-target outcomes from acceleration are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns flood-protection valuation, not lifecycle material circularity.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C13R01L01","evidence":"No lifecycle impacts invisible from a point of sale or operation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C13R01L02","evidence":"No post-use material path is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C13R01L03","evidence":"No circularity claim or burden shifting across lifecycle phases is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QBEEB5559E483"}