{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The fixed warning trigger has become unreliable and mistimed after runoff and measurement conditions changed.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01R01L01","evidence":"The formerly effective fixed trigger now produces frequent false warnings and provides little useful lead time in rapid storms.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01R01L02","evidence":"Upstream development made runoff faster and erratic, and replacement gauges react sharply to turbulence and debris.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01R01L03","evidence":"Short spikes produce non-flood warnings and workload, while rapid dangerous rises leave little lead time.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01R02L01","evidence":"Staff increasingly manually assess alarm credibility immediately after formal-trigger warnings, indicating the rule no longer fits conditions on its own.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC01R02","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC02","confidence":0.96,"reason":"No connected propagation flow is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC02R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes warning effects and operational burden, not a connected flow propagating a fault or overload past a danger threshold.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03","confidence":0.87,"reason":"A warning threshold and consequential boundary are present, but the response-design conditions are not fully evidenced.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03R01L01","evidence":"Brief spikes crossing the fixed gauge level trigger substantial warning and mobilization consequences.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03R01L02","evidence":"The scenario does not describe a proportional response rule or its relative overreaction and underreaction across regions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03R01L03","evidence":"The fixed level separates ordinary readings from the warning-response regime.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03R01L04","evidence":"River readings can rapidly progress to dangerous flooding conditions, a consequential safety boundary.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03R01L05","evidence":"No evidence states whether procedures have explicit rules for changing authority, resources, or methods.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC04","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The warning channel is attention-seeking and repeatedly generates false alarms, but reliable feedback-system absence is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC04R01L01","evidence":"Warnings are used to notify neighborhoods and prompt dispatcher and school action.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC04R01L02","evidence":"Residents receive repeated overnight messages, and dispatchers face frequent warnings.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC04R01L03","evidence":"Frequent warnings during brief spikes never produce flooding, yet impose mobilization and attention costs.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC04R01L04","evidence":"Falling public response rates are reported, but the scenario does not establish whether feedback about notice, action, usefulness, duplication, or harm is reliably absent.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No nested local-versus-aggregate indicator structure is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01L01","evidence":"No aggregate stability and local-unit variation comparison is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01L02","evidence":"No rule for distinguishing local alarm noise from broader system movement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01L03","evidence":"No nested indicator levels under separate owners are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01L04","evidence":"No early-warning design based on local signals preceding aggregate strengthening is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01L05","evidence":"No comparison between frontline observations and leadership metrics is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01L06","evidence":"No favorable aggregate concealing regional or subgroup deterioration is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06","confidence":0.94,"reason":"Receivers experience repeated weak signals and the trigger is unchanged, but the remaining incentive and action conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01L01","evidence":"Warnings are frequent, but the scenario does not establish issuance to a growing share of cases.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01L02","evidence":"No evidence compares the cost of issuance with reputational or other benefits of signaling.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01L03","evidence":"Repeated non-flood warnings accompany falling public response rates.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01L04","evidence":"The warning rule remains formally unchanged despite changed runoff and gauge behavior.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01L05","evidence":"The scenario does not describe a promised warning response being decoupled from actual action.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01L06","evidence":"No competing senders or salience escalation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The gauge measure is explicitly affected by brief transient turbulence and debris spikes.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R01L01","evidence":"No eligibility decision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R02L01","evidence":"No singling out of best or worst performers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R03L01","evidence":"No care process or symptom crisis is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R04L01","evidence":"No inspection process following an incident spike is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R05L01","evidence":"No retesting process following an extreme screen is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R06L01","evidence":"No before-after comparison is identified as the primary evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R07L01","evidence":"New gauges react sharply to brief turbulence and floating debris, producing short spikes.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC07R07","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish dependent chain-reaction propagation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01L01","evidence":"No local event triggering a sequence of dependent changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01L02","evidence":"No coupling structure carrying propagation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01L03","evidence":"No propagation outrunning review or response is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01L04","evidence":"No downstream actors observing symptoms without upstream-link visibility are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01L05","evidence":"No beneficial cascade or uncontrolled reinforcement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01L06","evidence":"No comparison of isolated-event safeguards with chain-reaction safeguards is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No supervisory-span or governance-overload structure is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09R01L01","evidence":"No growth in direct supervisory span relative to attention capacity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09R01L02","evidence":"No increasing missed signals or late interventions is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09R01L03","evidence":"No delegation arrangement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09R01L04","evidence":"No dependence on heroic continuous availability of particular people is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09R01L05","evidence":"No governance forums are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC10","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Changed conditions create warning-system problems, but a defined residual-risk event and its temporal evolution are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC10R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not identify a triggering event or incident that has created a specified residual risk.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC10R01L02","evidence":"No specified residual risk is described as changing with remediation, clean observations, checks, or conditions.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC11","confidence":0.93,"reason":"Warnings are uncertain early signals with meaningful costs on both sides, but no noise-or-crisis polarization routine is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC11R01L01","evidence":"Warnings are issued from gauge crossings while staff then determine whether the reading is credible and many spikes never lead to flooding.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC11R01L02","evidence":"False warnings interrupt duties and reduce public response, while rapid dangerous rises leave little useful lead time.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC11R01L03","evidence":"Gauge readings are indirect warning evidence, brief turbulence and debris distort them, and staff must assess credibility.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC11R01L04","evidence":"No routine is described that categorizes signals only as noise or crisis.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No delayed feedback relation or recurrent-lag analysis is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12R01L01","evidence":"No current outcome is described as depending on earlier states, decisions, shocks, cues, or interventions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12R01L02","evidence":"No delayed feedback relation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12R01L03","evidence":"No recurrent pattern record with an unknown operative lag is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12R01L04","evidence":"No recurrence analysis requiring distinction from seasonality, measurement delay, or common cause is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12R01L05","evidence":"No alternative memory horizons are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No asymmetric accumulation, locking, or persistence-of-patches mechanism is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13R01L01","evidence":"No routine additions with extraordinary or unowned removal are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13R01L02","evidence":"No baseline comparison pattern of prior state versus original intent is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13R01L03","evidence":"No two-way pressure with one-way locking mechanism is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13R01L04","evidence":"No accumulation of small increments into large system cost or behavioral change is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13R01L05","evidence":"No temporary patch or emergency measure persisting after its trigger ends is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QC1E3638E648BC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QC1E3638E648B"}