{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario provides no evidence of a managed future-value placeholder workflow.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L01","evidence":"No producer/consumer future-value arrangement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L02","evidence":"No known future result slot with unknown current content is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L03","evidence":"No continuations, waits, retries, fallbacks, or cancellation attached to a future value are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L04","evidence":"No pending-item identity, ownership, lifecycle, or audit mechanism is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L05","evidence":"No multiple dependents observing one eventual outcome are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L06","evidence":"No explicit handling of pending-item failure, timeout, cancellation, or partial fulfillment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01L07","evidence":"No cross-boundary placeholder or authority controls are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish the specified ordering, readiness-window, feedback, or parallel-work dynamics.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02R01L01","evidence":"No evidence states that activity order changes outcomes.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02R01L02","evidence":"Fulfillment deadlines are mentioned, but readiness or opportunity windows opening and closing are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02R01L03","evidence":"No subsystem tempo or phase mismatch is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02R01L04","evidence":"No delayed feedback after a state change is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02R01L05","evidence":"No parallel work races or rework are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No distributed multi-participant decision process is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01L01","evidence":"The checkout system automatically applies one rule; multiple decision participants are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01L02","evidence":"Conflicting correct participant decisions are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01L03","evidence":"Independent participant or communication-path failures are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01L04","evidence":"Persistence across retry, leadership change, or recovery is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01L05","evidence":"Consistency/availability tradeoffs during partitions are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01L06","evidence":"Changing membership and durable vote evidence are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario is about a live fraud threshold, not accumulated artifact layers.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04R01L01","evidence":"No accumulating time-ordered artifact layers are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04R01L02","evidence":"No older artifacts losing capability, reliability, or validity through exposure are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04R01L03","evidence":"No recurring retention burden from unclear-purpose layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04R01L04","evidence":"No removal risk involving rollback, audit, lineage, recovery, or interpretation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04R01L05","evidence":"No stale artifact layers being mistaken for current truth are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC05","confidence":0.93,"reason":"Historical observations were generalized, but the stated numeric rule contains no broad-language claim.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC05R01L01","evidence":"The transaction score was developed from two-year-old records and used as the basis for the current rule.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC05R01L02","evidence":"The stated rule is a score cutoff above 72, not a rule containing broad language such as always, never, or sufficient.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC05R01L03","evidence":"Cross-border purchases, new payments, digital goods, volume changes, and linked-account fraud are identified conditions that violate the old rule's fit.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC05R01L04","evidence":"No deliberate iterative exposure to discordant cases and subsequent falsification, revision, or rescoping is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC05R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The score-based policy was deployed into a materially changed marketplace beyond the regime represented by its historical records.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R01L01","evidence":"The cutoff performed poorly from its first day, so no stable result is described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R02L01","evidence":"No cohesion-driven pressure, suppression of private evidence, or dissent is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R03L01","evidence":"The score was trained on old domestic repeat-buyer and conventional-card records, then deployed after expansion, processor changes, digital-goods additions, volume growth, and changed fraud tactics.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R03","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R04L01","evidence":"No aggregate average and consequential residual variation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC06R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No order-dependent representation or ambiguous ordering problem is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC07R01L01","evidence":"No hashes, diffs, signatures, indexes, replays, or other order-dependent representations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC07R01L02","evidence":"No competing item orders or missing authoritative ordering rule are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC07R01L03","evidence":"No equal or incomparable items requiring sequential processing are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC07R01L04","evidence":"No consequences of changing an item order are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The environment shifted and the cutoff causes errors, but the scenario explicitly says it was never acceptable for live marketplace orders.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08R01L01","evidence":"The scenario states there was no earlier period in which the cutoff sorted the marketplace's live orders acceptably.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08R01L02","evidence":"Countries, payment processors, merchant types, order volume, and fraud tactics changed from the historical training regime.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08R01L03","evidence":"The cutoff creates false holds and delays for legitimate cross-border orders while missing coordinated fraud and increasing chargeback losses.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08R02L01","evidence":"Staff have no discretionary bypass, customers have no appeal channel, and no parallel unusual-transaction process exists.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC08R02","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC09","confidence":0.94,"reason":"Held orders exceed analyst capacity before deadlines, but the remaining queue dynamics are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC09R01L01","evidence":"Analysts cannot clear resulting holds before fulfillment deadlines.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC09R01L02","evidence":"Higher volume is described, but new arrivals obscuring or preventing backlog reduction is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC09R01L03","evidence":"The composition of the held-order queue across the listed item states is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC09R01L04","evidence":"No restart and downstream overload release are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No bounded inspection artifact or independent multi-inspector process is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01L01","evidence":"No fixed bounded artifact available for inspection during a stable window is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01L02","evidence":"No single-inspector blind-spot issue is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01L03","evidence":"No independent inspectors are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01L04","evidence":"No differing inspector expertise or blind spots are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01L05","evidence":"No shared reconciliation layer for findings is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01L06","evidence":"No overlapping inspection coverage is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No macro-level assertion or reduction account is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC11R01L01","evidence":"No macro property asserted without a part-level causal account is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC11R01L02","evidence":"No lower-level reconstruction assumptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC11R01L03","evidence":"No whole-level residual validity check is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not describe a source account whose reliability or framing must be assessed.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12R01L01","evidence":"No source reporting inaccessible reality to a receiver is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12R01L02","evidence":"No suspected systematic source distortion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12R01L03","evidence":"No source account with potentially useful information is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12R01L04","evidence":"No account with differently reliable parts is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12R01L05","evidence":"No telling order, emphasis, or framing distinct from event order is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario identifies held orders and analyst delays, but does not establish unreliable item-level representation in the internal workflow.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R01L01","evidence":"No work waiting outside the active workflow is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R01L02","evidence":"No lack of reliable item-level representation for admitted obligations is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R02L01","evidence":"No reliance on aggregate counts that hide item-level waiting state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R02L02","evidence":"No lack of reliable item-level representation for admitted obligations is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R03L01","evidence":"No actor disagreement about queue state due to unreliable representation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R03L02","evidence":"No lack of reliable item-level representation for admitted obligations is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R04L01","evidence":"No evidence that old or neglected items remain unresolved because attention favors newer or easier work is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R04L02","evidence":"No lack of reliable item-level representation for admitted obligations is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825AC13R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QCA1F63C2825A"}