{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario provides no evidence of stable-state geometry, basins, thresholds, or repeated reversion.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R01L01","evidence":"No resets, reforms, or decay back to a pattern are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R02L01","evidence":"No starting-state sensitivity or qualitatively divergent long-run outcomes are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R02L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R03L01","evidence":"No inferior stable convention coordinated by an organization or population is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R03L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R04L01","evidence":"No distinct decline and recovery thresholds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R04L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R05L01","evidence":"No local optima, stable cycles, regimes, or self-reinforcing equilibria are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R05L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R06L01","evidence":"No desired state or inaccessible basin is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R06L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R07L01","evidence":"No harmful state with hard-to-exit feedback is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R07L02","evidence":"No stable-state geometry, preferred basin, or transition-dynamics constraint is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C01R07","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario describes redundant water conveyances, not harmful and necessary boundary crossings requiring differentiated handling.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R01L01","evidence":"No necessary and harmful flows using the same boundary channel are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R01L02","evidence":"No harmful intrusion, leakage, contamination, abuse, malformed input, or exposure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R01L03","evidence":"No need for carrier-specific handling beyond binary access is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R01L04","evidence":"No current crossing rules or equivalence of attempts are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R02L01","evidence":"No necessary and harmful flows using the same boundary channel are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R02L02","evidence":"No over-sealing of a boundary is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R02L03","evidence":"No need for carrier-specific handling beyond binary access is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R02L04","evidence":"No current crossing rules or equivalence of attempts are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C02R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03","confidence":0.97,"reason":"Water flows are described, but the required stock-and-flow accounting network and balance defects are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03R01L01","evidence":"No named stock accumulating, depleting, saturating, decaying, or carrying latent burden is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03R01L02","evidence":"No multiple-reservoir exchange of a conserved quantity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03R01L03","evidence":"No stated network-wide stock-level changes caused by a local route change are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03R01L04","evidence":"No traceable relabeling or category change of conserved content is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03R01L05","evidence":"No hidden sinks, untracked sources, leakage, shrinkage, or double counting is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish the specified hidden remote-dependency pattern.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01L01","evidence":"No repeated failure of local-only explanations is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01L02","evidence":"A rockfall affected a conveyance, but the scenario does not establish it as a distant shock producing local consequences.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01L03","evidence":"No hidden upstream, downstream, or cross-boundary dependency is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01L04","evidence":"No remote indicators preceding local symptoms are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01L05","evidence":"No delayed, indirect, or transformed effects are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01L06","evidence":"No local action producing remote consequences that later return is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05","confidence":0.97,"reason":"No scarce choke point controlling passage or associated selection effects are established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R01L01","evidence":"The two independently controlled conveyances can each carry the full minimum allocation, so no scarce controlling choke point is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R01L02","evidence":"No candidate pool, exclusions, ranking logic, or denial reasons are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R02L01","evidence":"The two independently controlled conveyances can each carry the full minimum allocation, so no scarce controlling choke point is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R02L02","evidence":"No gatekeeper skew through discretion, private information, incentives, bias, or algorithmic rules is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R03L01","evidence":"The two independently controlled conveyances can each carry the full minimum allocation, so no scarce controlling choke point is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R03L02","evidence":"No downstream decision treating a passed set as representative is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C05R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a consolidated trunk-to-many-endpoint terminal bottleneck.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C06R01L01","evidence":"No high-volume consolidated upstream trunk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C06R01L02","evidence":"The three valleys are described, but no terminal branching into many low-volume heterogeneous endpoints is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C06R01L03","evidence":"No endpoint-specific completion requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C06R01L04","evidence":"No excess of upstream throughput over verified endpoint completion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C07","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish an expected conserved quantity crossing a boundary where leakage or externalization could occur.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C07R01L01","evidence":"No quantity is explicitly expected to remain present or equivalent across the listed transformations or handoffs.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C07R01L02","evidence":"No boundary at which the quantity could leak or be externalized is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No edge zone between distinct regimes with gradient-specific phenomena is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C08R01L01","evidence":"No two qualitatively different regimes meeting are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C08R01L02","evidence":"No steep gradient across a meeting zone is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C08R01L03","evidence":"No phenomena unique to a zone are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C08R01L04","evidence":"No rules derived from either interior or their failure at an edge zone are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a repeating process with accumulating losses, disequilibrium effects, or a claimed closed loop.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09R01L01","evidence":"No cyclic input-transformation-output-recovery or reuse process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09R01L02","evidence":"No accumulating waste, rework, waiting, degraded material, lost information, or capacity loss is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09R01L03","evidence":"No high-throughput process pushed from equilibrium or resulting instability is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09R01L04","evidence":"No claimed closed loop or external cleanup and maintenance boundary issue is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09R01L05","evidence":"No comparison limited to current practice is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish gradient-driven transfer between distinct streams with staged-contact design choices.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C10R01L01","evidence":"No target quantity crossing between distinguishable streams while bulk separation remains meaningful is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C10R01L02","evidence":"No local state difference governing transfer rate is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C10R01L03","evidence":"No spatially extended or sequentially staged contact design is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C10R01L04","evidence":"No co-current, batch, or unordered-contact equilibration problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"A conveyance was blocked, while essential water delivery had to and did continue through the other conveyance.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C11R01L01","evidence":"A rockfall closed the western tunnel for nine hours; earlier maintenance affected the eastern head gate.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C11R01L02","evidence":"The minimum allocation is required to keep young trees alive, and the other conveyance continued delivering essential allotments to all valleys.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C11R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C12","confidence":1,"reason":"The scenario explicitly states that obstruction of either incoming conveyance alone does not stop essential delivery.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C12R01L01","evidence":"Each conveyance can carry the full minimum allocation independently, and inspection records explicitly show either one alone does not stop essential delivery.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C12R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish uncontrolled flows, flow interference, invisibility until failure, or official-channel bypass.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R01L01","evidence":"No flow spreading through informal or uncontrolled paths is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R01L02","evidence":"No spillover damage or stated safety, fairness, privacy, or environmental risk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R02L01","evidence":"No multiple flow classes interfering with each other are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R03L01","evidence":"No important flow remaining invisible until after failure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R04L01","evidence":"No official channels being bypassed is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8C13R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QCB25E3CF58E8"}