{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario describes isolated records and missing paths, but does not establish the stated transfer-context, documentation, misuse, or shared-contract conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L01","evidence":"Records reside in isolated systems, but no artifact crossing into a context unable to inspect full production state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L02","evidence":"No evidence addresses consumers using artifacts without full documentation.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L03","evidence":"Observed failures are attributed to absent paths, not stripped contextual state.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L04","evidence":"A common message format exists, but multiple producer and consumer audiences requiring a stable shared interaction contract is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario provides no evidence of bounded-value mappings, collisions, or mapping-generation conditions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L01","evidence":"No downstream uniqueness inference is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L02","evidence":"No distinct sources mapping to one bounded target value is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L03","evidence":"No collision consequence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L04","evidence":"No concurrent, random, multi-authority, truncated, or changing-rule mapping process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03","confidence":0.94,"reason":"Source-system measurements and records are stated to be complete; the route's requirement that external records be absent, unreliable, adversarial, or impractical is contradicted.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L01","evidence":"The plant must reconstruct lot history from records across transport and storage systems.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L02","evidence":"Measurements are complete inside their source systems, and shipment records are available; the problem is absent inter-island paths.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L03","evidence":"No stable source-dependent physical signature is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L04","evidence":"No signature reference library is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L05","evidence":"No probabilistic origin inference is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario does not establish production-feature attribution or unreliable declared metadata.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04R01L01","evidence":"Tool readings and inspections are mentioned, but repeated measurable production features of an output are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04R01L02","evidence":"No declared metadata, custody record, or self-report is stated to be absent, incomplete, or manipulable.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Lot history matters to quality-alert investigation, but the route's record-drift, correction, temporal, and rebuildable-view conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L01","evidence":"The path by which each wafer lot arose matters to reconstruct history after a quality alert.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L02","evidence":"Isolated records are described, but drift, overwriting history, or manual reconciliation is not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L03","evidence":"No corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L04","evidence":"No recurring roles, locations, or transformations that cannot be static attributes are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L05","evidence":"No partial, uncertain, source-local, or causal-distinct temporal order is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L06","evidence":"No derived, rebuildable current-state view is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Identity schemes and universal credentials are mentioned, but the required identity-claim decision workflow and associated risks are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L01","evidence":"No actor or object is described as asserting identity or origin for a decision.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L02","evidence":"No downstream decision depending on such a claim is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L03","evidence":"No imitation, replay, forgery, staleness, delegation, or confusion risk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L04","evidence":"No repeatable claim-evidence verification procedure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L05","evidence":"No false-acceptance or false-rejection tradeoff is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L06","evidence":"No verdict scope by freshness, capability, custody, trust anchor, or assurance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L07","evidence":"No required legible identity decision state is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The information is explicitly split into four isolated data islands, contradicting a commingled information store.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L01","evidence":"Records form four isolated data islands rather than a commingled store.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L02","evidence":"No use rule depending on source class is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L03","evidence":"No indirect or degraded source cues are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L04","evidence":"No fluency-based evidentiary error is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L05","evidence":"Quality-alert consequences are implied, but the specified source-cue errors are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario mentions a controlled replica but provides no replica convergence, conflict, tombstone, or recovery contract evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC08R01L01","evidence":"No evidence states whether a complete convergence, conflict, tombstone, and recovery contract exists for replicas.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Records exchange automatically over existing joins and lot history/audit matters, but reconstruction of transferable structure and the other representation conditions are not fully established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L01","evidence":"Joined endpoints exchange records automatically, establishing record transfer across system boundaries.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L02","evidence":"The required reconstruction is lot history, but not explicitly reconstruction of a transferred structure.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L03","evidence":"No non-transferable pointers, ambient state, handles, defaults, or implicit relationships are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L04","evidence":"A common message format exists, but a common flat representation of structured state is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L05","evidence":"Traceability and rapid quality-alert reconstruction make auditability and replayability relevant.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The topology, fragmentation, and nonlinear component-merging effect are established, but usable connections are explicitly never rejected for compatibility, capacity, timing, trust, or permission reasons.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L01","evidence":"Reconstructing every lot's history requires paths across a multilayer organizational and system network.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L02","evidence":"Records form four isolated data islands with no continuous end-to-end route.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L03","evidence":"Two absent paths together raise coverage from 52% to 93%, while either alone changes it by under three points.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L04","evidence":"All joined endpoints exchange automatically; format, identity, credentials, permissions, capacity, timing, trust, and policy cannot reject traffic. Only absent paths fail.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No equivalent-item sprawl, duplicate processing, inconsistent treatment, fragmented identity, or naming drift is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L01","evidence":"No proliferation of equivalent variants is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L02","evidence":"No repeated processing of equivalent items as distinct is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L03","evidence":"No inconsistent treatment of equivalent items is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L04","evidence":"No fragmented identity or history across equivalent records is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L05","evidence":"No semantic or naming drift is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario is about missing topology, not protected facts, observable behavioral consequences, or a field-enumerating access policy.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01L01","evidence":"No protected fact changing system behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01L02","evidence":"No observers comparing outputs across cases, times, accounts, regions, or query variants are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01L03","evidence":"Universal permissions are stated, but no access policy enumerating fields or permissions while omitting consequences is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No migration, crosswalk, encoding, allocation, schema transition, or exact bidirectional mapping is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L01","evidence":"No preservation-claiming migration, crosswalk, encoding, allocation, or schema transition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L02","evidence":"No exact one-to-one and distinguishable source-to-target mapping is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L03","evidence":"No governed target coverage or orphan-target condition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L04","evidence":"No backward trace through a mapping or defined round trip is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L05","evidence":"No mapping validity requirement across collection changes is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QDF22CE57702A"}