{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The route is contradicted because the stated failure is absence of a path, not loss of contextual state during transfer.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L01","evidence":"Records must move between four isolated systems when inter-island paths are present.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L02","evidence":"The scenario gives no evidence about consumers using artifacts without full documentation.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L03","evidence":"The scenario states that the only observed failures occur where no physical or logical path exists, rather than from stripped transfer context.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01L04","evidence":"The four systems use the same message format and identity scheme.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC01R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No target-value mapping, collision possibility, collision consequence, or mapping-generation process is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L01","evidence":"No downstream unique-value evidence rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L02","evidence":"No bounded target-value mapping is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L03","evidence":"No collision consequence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01L04","evidence":"No concurrent, random, multi-authority, truncated, or changing-namespace mapping process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario concerns lot-history connectivity, without the stated provenance-signature evidence chain.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L01","evidence":"Lot history must be reconstructed, but required recovery of origin or source contribution after the listed handling processes is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L02","evidence":"No absence, unreliability, adversarial status, or impracticality of labels, custody records, ledgers, or testimony is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L03","evidence":"Tool and inspection readings are mentioned, but no stable source-dependent item signature is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L04","evidence":"No reference signature library is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01L05","evidence":"No probabilistic origin inference is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Neither production-feature fingerprinting nor unreliable declared metadata is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04R01L01","evidence":"Readings and inspection results are mentioned, but repeated measurable production-caused features are not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04R01L02","evidence":"No declared metadata, custody records, or self-reports are described as absent, incomplete, or manipulable.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"History reconstruction matters, but the remaining event-record and temporal-model conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L01","evidence":"Each wafer lot's history must be reconstructed for a quality-alert response.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L02","evidence":"The records are isolated, but drift, overwriting, and manual reconciliation are not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L03","evidence":"No corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L04","evidence":"No requirement concerning representation of recurring participants, roles, locations, or transformations is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L05","evidence":"No partial, source-local, uncertain, or causal-time ordering is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01L06","evidence":"No derived-and-rebuildable current-state view is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"A shared identity scheme exists, but the scenario does not establish the asserted identity-claim verification route.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L01","evidence":"A common identity scheme is stated, but no actor or object assertion of identity or origin is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L02","evidence":"No listed downstream decision is stated to depend on an identity or origin claim.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L03","evidence":"No imitation, replay, substitution, theft, forgery, staleness, delegation, or confusion risk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L04","evidence":"No repeatable verification procedure for admissible identity evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L05","evidence":"No false-acceptance or false-rejection tradeoff is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L06","evidence":"No identity-verdict scope by freshness, capability, context, custody, trust anchor, or assurance level is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01L07","evidence":"No required identity decision state before downstream processing is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly describes four isolated data islands, not a commingled information store.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L01","evidence":"Records form four isolated data islands.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L02","evidence":"No dependence of use on source class is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L03","evidence":"No indirect or degraded source cues are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L04","evidence":"No fluency-based evidentiary error is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01L05","evidence":"Quality-alert consequences are mentioned, but consequences of the route's stated source-class errors are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC07R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"A controlled replica is mentioned, but no replica convergence, conflict, tombstone, or recovery contract is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC08R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not state whether the organization has a complete replica convergence, conflict, tombstone, and recovery contract.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09","confidence":0.97,"reason":"Inter-system record transfer and traceability matter, but the reconstruction and representation requirements are not fully established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L01","evidence":"Inter-island paths are required for records to move among the isolated systems.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L02","evidence":"No requirement for a receiver to reconstruct a structure rather than read a human-facing description is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L03","evidence":"No non-transferable pointers, ambient state, handles, defaults, or implicit relationships are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L04","evidence":"A shared message format is stated, but a common flat representation of structured state is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01L05","evidence":"The required ability to follow each lot through final release establishes traceability and audit relevance.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The network and threshold conditions are present, but the scenario explicitly makes physical or logical path existence the sole usability constraint.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L01","evidence":"The query must follow lots across four system islands rather than rely on local system performance.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L02","evidence":"The records form four isolated data islands with no continuous route across every lot history.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L03","evidence":"One added path changes coverage by under three points, while two raise it from 52% to 93%.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01L04","evidence":"The scenario says all compatibility, capacity, timing, trust, and permission conditions are universally satisfied and only missing physical or logical paths cause failures.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC10R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario describes disconnected systems, not proliferation or inconsistent treatment of equivalent records.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L01","evidence":"No proliferation of equivalent variants is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L02","evidence":"No repeated processing of equivalent items as distinct is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L03","evidence":"No inconsistent treatment of equivalent items is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L04","evidence":"No fragmentation of one entity's identity or history across equivalent records is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01L05","evidence":"No semantic or naming drift is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario gives no protected fact, observable policy consequence, or field-enumerating access policy.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01L01","evidence":"No protected fact or policy-compliant payload behavior difference is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01L02","evidence":"No observer comparison across the specified cases, times, accounts, regions, or query variants is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01L03","evidence":"Permissions are universal, but no access policy enumerating fields or permissions while omitting observable consequences is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No migration, crosswalk, allocation, or exact preservation mapping is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L01","evidence":"No migration, crosswalk, encoding, allocation, or schema transition claiming exact preservation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L02","evidence":"No one-to-one mapping or distinguishability guarantee is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L03","evidence":"No governed target-set coverage or orphan-target condition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L04","evidence":"No mapping trace-back or full round-trip condition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01L05","evidence":"No exact mapping under collection additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QDF22CE57702AC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QDF22CE57702A"}