{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C01","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Monitoring and dispatch decisions are described, but no activation criterion is specified.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C01R01L01","evidence":"The utility monitors fault episodes and dispatchers must act within seconds.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C01R01L02","evidence":"The scenario describes signatures but does not specify an observable criterion that justifies activation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a feature-binding problem across candidate objects or episodes.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02R01L01","evidence":"Separate feature channels or processing stages are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02R01L02","evidence":"Potential assignment of the same features to multiple episodes is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02R01L03","evidence":"A need to recover a correctly bound feature bundle is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02R01L04","evidence":"Wrong assignment of individually correct features is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02R01L05","evidence":"No binding cue is specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No distributed emergent macro-pattern is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C03R01L01","evidence":"Interaction among local actors jointly generating a system-level phenomenon is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C03R01L02","evidence":"Distributed generation of a macro-pattern is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C03R01L03","evidence":"Monitoring is described, but failure to test for an emergent macro-pattern is not specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not specify baselines, comparative interpretation, or residual flags.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01L01","evidence":"A baseline, target, norm, or comparator is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01L02","evidence":"Ambiguity across scale, context, season, subgroup, method, or exposure is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01L03","evidence":"A departure requiring tracking or escalation is not specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01L04","evidence":"Different baseline interpretations of the same observation are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01L05","evidence":"Baseline versioning or drift is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01L06","evidence":"A delta, residual, variance, anomaly, or out-of-range flag is not specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly describes sparse, episode-specific combinations from a large signature catalog and the costs of evaluating the full catalog or using a fixed shortlist.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05R01L01","evidence":"The catalog has roughly 6,000 signatures, while a typical disturbance involves only three to eight.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05R01L02","evidence":"Dispatchers must see applicable conditions within seconds, while every absent signature delays decisions.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05R01L03","evidence":"Consequential events are distinguished by particular combinations of familiar signatures.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05R01L04","evidence":"Evaluating and transmitting the full catalog causes screen lag, radio saturation, and overlooked details.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05R01L05","evidence":"A permanent shortlist performs poorly because different episode types make different signatures relevant.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C05R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No near-threshold event or counterfactual near miss is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06R01L01","evidence":"A case near a meaningful threshold is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06R01L02","evidence":"A near miss changing attention or motivation is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06R01L03","evidence":"Insufficiency of actual outcomes for learning or review is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06R01L04","evidence":"No nearby counterfactual is specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06R01L05","evidence":"Normalization or overreaction to near misses is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No conditional hazard path, joint safeguard failure, or dependence analysis is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L01","evidence":"A hazard-to-target path through conditional safeguards or dependencies is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L02","evidence":"A rare joint activating configuration is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L03","evidence":"One-factor tests versus integrated unsafe behavior are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L04","evidence":"A locally safe change completing a latent path is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L05","evidence":"Risk estimates multiplying marginal probabilities are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L06","evidence":"Shared dependencies among redundant barriers or teams are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01L07","evidence":"Uncovered higher-order interaction states are not specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Resource constraints are explicit, but predictability, measurable prediction error, and compatible reconstruction are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C08R01L01","evidence":"Strong predictability over a relevant horizon, context, or hierarchy is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C08R01L02","evidence":"Full-catalog transmission saturates radio links and screen lag impairs control-room use.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C08R01L03","evidence":"Prediction error is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C08R01L04","evidence":"A receiver reconstructing expected context from a compatible model is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish an event-history or rebuildable-state record model.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01L01","evidence":"The explanatory or audit importance of the path to present state is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01L02","evidence":"Drifting independent entity records or manual reconciliation is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01L03","evidence":"Preservation of prior record states after corrections or retractions is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01L04","evidence":"Recurring participants or transformations exceeding static attributes are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01L05","evidence":"Partial, uncertain, source-local, or causal temporal ordering is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01L06","evidence":"Derived and rebuildable current-state views are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Cascading failures are mentioned, but no response thresholds, operating regimes, or authority-change rules are specified.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10R01L01","evidence":"Outsized consequences from small changes near a boundary are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10R01L02","evidence":"Inadequacy of proportional response is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10R01L03","evidence":"Distinct operating regimes separated by response thresholds are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10R01L04","evidence":"A target variable approaching a consequential boundary is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10R01L05","evidence":"Procedures lacking explicit rules for changes in authority, resources, or methods are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No continuous source encoded by stereotyped event timing or counts is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01L01","evidence":"A continuous, graded, or probabilistic source quantity is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01L02","evidence":"A carrier of stereotyped unit events is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01L03","evidence":"A receiver observing event timing or count rather than source magnitude is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01L04","evidence":"Stochastic or intermittent arrivals impairing single-event magnitude estimates are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01L05","evidence":"A speed-versus-confidence tradeoff from accumulating events is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01L06","evidence":"Rate saturation or disappearance within a decoding window is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not specify serial defensive layers, their gaps, or correlated barrier failures.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L01","evidence":"A hazard trajectory through several serial defensive layers is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L02","evidence":"Open, bypassed, degraded, or overloaded paths in defensive layers are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L03","evidence":"Shared causes governing defensive-layer dependence are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L04","evidence":"Safety claims counting nominal layers without independence or health evidence are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L05","evidence":"Incidents with nominal controls failing to block the same hazard trajectory are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L06","evidence":"Distributed ownership of cross-layer gap correlation is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01L07","evidence":"Rare catastrophic aligned failure concealed by averages is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No delayed feedback relation, recurrent record pattern, or competing memory horizon is specified.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13R01L01","evidence":"Current outcomes returning in response to earlier states or interventions are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13R01L02","evidence":"A delayed feedback relation causing oscillation or policy resistance is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13R01L03","evidence":"Recurrent state or event patterns with an unknown lag are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13R01L04","evidence":"A need to distinguish recurrence from seasonality, delay, or a shared cause is not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13R01L05","evidence":"Multiple plausible memory horizons are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QE3F73B785D82"}