{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"CONTRADICTED","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The stakes and local anchoring path are evidenced, but audits explicitly negate a known recurring bias vulnerability for this decision class.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C01R01L01","evidence":"$320 million deployment is effectively unrecoverable for twelve years and failure interrupts international commitments.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C01R01L02","evidence":"Longitudinal audits found no recurring association with anchoring, sunk-cost effects, optimism, authority pressure, or other identified procedural distortion.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C01R01L03","evidence":"The standard certification checklist does not address estimate presentation order or estimate authorship.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C01R01L04","evidence":"The prominently presented 92 percent estimate causes later reviewer estimates to cluster around it, while the review does not address presentation order.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C01R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C02","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The decision depends on tests, vendors, weather, and roles, but later verification or reuse conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C02R01L01","evidence":"The decision concerns pressure and seal tests, vendor signatures, reviewer estimates, and a closing weather window.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C02R01L02","evidence":"No evidence states that another party or future team must verify or rerun the result.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C02R01L03","evidence":"No evidence establishes challenge, replication, scaling, transfer, automation, or precedential use.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The scenario supports concern about anchoring, but does not establish the full source-account reliability structure.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03R01L01","evidence":"The reliability estimate concerns future performance after an unrecoverable trench deployment, which cannot be directly inspected beforehand.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03R01L02","evidence":"Reviewer estimates cluster around the prominently presented figure, making anchoring a plausible systematic influence.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03R01L03","evidence":"No evidence characterizes the director's account as containing useful information despite the suspected distortion.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03R01L04","evidence":"No evidence identifies distinct parts of an account with differing reliability.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03R01L05","evidence":"No evidence establishes that the account's telling order, emphasis, or framing differs from event order or causal structure.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No protected fact, output comparison, or field-based access policy is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C04R01L01","evidence":"No protected fact or policy-compliant payload behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C04R01L02","evidence":"No observer comparison of outputs across cases, times, accounts, regions, or variants is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C04R01L03","evidence":"No access policy enumerating fields or permissions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a fault-tolerant multi-participant decision protocol.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01L01","evidence":"Reviewers provide estimates, but no evidence states that participants propose or acknowledge values for one logical decision.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01L02","evidence":"No evidence establishes a safety or correctness violation from differing participant decisions.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01L03","evidence":"No independently failing participants or communication paths are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01L04","evidence":"No retry, leadership-change, or recovery persistence requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01L05","evidence":"No partition-related availability-versus-consistency tradeoff is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01L06","evidence":"No changing membership or retained vote/log evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C06","confidence":0.96,"reason":"Irreversibility is evidenced, but incremental construction, immediate scoring, and compositional local choices are not.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C06R01L01","evidence":"No solution-construction process from successive feasible choices is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C06R01L02","evidence":"No scoring rule for each next step using immediately available information is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C06R01L03","evidence":"Once lowered, the array is effectively unrecoverable for twelve years.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C06R01L04","evidence":"No evidence shows that local choices usually compose well.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Technical failures are mentioned, but the required serial-layer failure structure is not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L01","evidence":"No serious-harm trajectory through several serial defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L02","evidence":"No non-trivial open or degraded probabilities for defensive layers are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L03","evidence":"No shared-source dependence among defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L04","evidence":"No safety claim counting nominal layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L05","evidence":"The archive reports technical failures, but not nominal controls failing to block the same hazard trajectory.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L06","evidence":"No distributed ownership of defensive layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01L07","evidence":"No rare aligned catastrophic failure concealed by averages is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C08","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No time-bounded acquisition process or missed-window learning effect is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C08R01L01","evidence":"No evidence compares acquisition effects across time or receiving-system state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C08R01L02","evidence":"No target configuration requiring experience, cue exposure, practice, interaction, or treatment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C08R01L03","evidence":"The weather window concerns deployment timing, not an estimated acquisition opening and closing interval.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C08R01L04","evidence":"No evidence states that missing an acquisition interval creates durable disadvantage or a different feasible outcome set.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No delayed or distance-degraded signal and endpoint divergence are described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C09R01L01","evidence":"No decision-dependent signal that must remain usable after delay or distance is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C09R01L02","evidence":"No weak-region or later-time receiver loss is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C09R01L03","evidence":"No differential decay among signal components or receiver groups is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C09R01L04","evidence":"No healthy source measurements paired with degrading endpoint outcomes are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No candidate-generation and separately checkable-witness workflow is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01L01","evidence":"No creative, combinatorial, heuristic, remote, proprietary, or expensive candidate-generation process is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01L02","evidence":"No stable checkable decision-relevant relation over a candidate and bounded evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01L03","evidence":"No witness, proof, trace, schedule, bound, oracle, or replay record is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01L04","evidence":"No parallel candidate generators are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01L05","evidence":"No authoritative acceptance path distinct from a generation stack is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01L06","evidence":"No evidence shows review capacity being spent repeating generation instead of checking explicit claims.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The director issued an estimate, but control or benefit over a validation verdict and the route-specific independent-review facts are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11R01L01","evidence":"No evidence states that an artifact producer controls or benefits from its validation verdict.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11R01L02","evidence":"No evidence states that affected external parties cannot inspect validity evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11R02L01","evidence":"No evidence states that an artifact producer controls or benefits from its validation verdict.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11R02L02","evidence":"The archive reports technical failures, but not prior internal checks or builder signoffs missing consequential defects, overfitting, assumptions, or scope exclusions.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C11R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C12","confidence":0.97,"reason":"Reliability is estimated for the decision, but overlapping target-nuisance components, discriminator models, and asymmetric error consequences are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C12R01L01","evidence":"The program director published a 92 percent reliability estimate for the deployment decision.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C12R01L02","evidence":"No overlapping target and nuisance components in an observed domain are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C12R01L03","evidence":"No target and nuisance models or structural discriminator constraints are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C12R01L04","evidence":"No materially different consequences of false retention versus false suppression are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"A point reliability estimate is described, but no decision-support interval procedure or its assumptions is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R01L01","evidence":"The scenario reports a 92 percent point reliability estimate, not an interval or error band.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R01L02","evidence":"No interval procedure or its assumptions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R01L03","evidence":"No small-sample, rare-outcome, skew, heavy-tail, or heteroscedastic-noise condition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R02L01","evidence":"The scenario reports a 92 percent point reliability estimate, not an interval or error band.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R02L02","evidence":"No interval procedure or its assumptions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R02L03","evidence":"No model selection, multiple comparisons, optional stopping, subgroup search, or adaptive experimentation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R03L01","evidence":"The scenario reports a 92 percent point reliability estimate, not an interval or error band.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R03L02","evidence":"No interval procedure or its assumptions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R03L03","evidence":"No evidence establishes differing interval coverage across groups, sites, products, periods, strata, or tail states.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R04L01","evidence":"The scenario reports a 92 percent point reliability estimate, not an interval or error band.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R04L02","evidence":"No interval procedure or its assumptions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R04L03","evidence":"No published, benchmark, or software-default interval method transported to a new domain is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9C13R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QEAB45087F7E9"}