{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly requires a portable structured session record across an API, archive, and different simulator, with fidelity and deterministic replay requirements.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01R01L01","evidence":"Each completed session must be sent through an API to an independent evidence archive and loaded years later into another simulator.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01R01L02","evidence":"The later simulator must recreate operational state and replay the event sequence.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01R01L03","evidence":"In-memory references, service handles, and workstation defaults are unavailable outside the originating simulator.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01R01L04","evidence":"Municipal teams, suppliers, audit software, and repositories need the same portable record despite different internal models.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01R01L05","evidence":"Investigators must verify identical ordered decisions and state transitions after restoration.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC01R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC02","confidence":0.97,"reason":"The scenario identifies lost object identities, but does not establish bounded-value collisions, collision consequences, or concurrent/random mapping generation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC02R01L01","evidence":"Object identities are often lost in current exports, but no downstream uniqueness interpretation is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC02R01L02","evidence":"No bounded target-value mapping or same-value collision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC02R01L03","evidence":"No collision-induced merge, overwrite, misrouting, or ambiguity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC02R01L04","evidence":"No concurrent, random, multi-authority, truncated, or changing-namespace identifier generation is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Multiple systems exchange records, but no replicated shared-state service, lagging reads, or consistency contract is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01L01","evidence":"Multiple organizations and processes are mentioned, but not concurrent observation or mutation of logically shared state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01L02","evidence":"No reads from a lagging, divergent, reordered, or incomplete replica are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01L03","evidence":"No delay- or partition-time coordination decision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01L04","evidence":"Replay ordering matters, but no user-facing replica consistency invariant is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01L05","evidence":"No consistency mechanism or advertised consistency model is mentioned.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01L06","evidence":"No replica lag, conflict, repair, or split-brain incident is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario concerns preservation and replay of exercise sessions, not comparison of a new case against a store of prior cases.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC04R01L01","evidence":"Investigators restore completed sessions; a new query or case requiring comparative judgment is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC04R01L02","evidence":"An evidence archive is described, but not a prior-case store with features, responses, and outcomes for comparison.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC04R01L03","evidence":"No judgment task resistant to a compact rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Event history and ordering matter for audit and replay, but the other event-record architecture conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01L01","evidence":"Investigators must recreate and replay the event sequence, and discrepancies affect accreditation and after-action findings.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01L02","evidence":"No independent entity-centric records drifting, overwriting history, or requiring reconciliation are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01L03","evidence":"No corrections, late evidence, retractions, or reinterpretations are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01L04","evidence":"Participants and transformations are present, but inability to represent them as static attributes is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01L05","evidence":"Timed status changes and event ordering are stated, but partial, uncertain, source-local, or causal temporal order is not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01L06","evidence":"No statement establishes current-state views as derived and rebuildable rather than authoritative.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC06","confidence":0.96,"reason":"Exercise sessions have an event sequence, but the required role/cue protocol and tacit-expectation failures are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC06R01L01","evidence":"A completed exercise session has timed status changes and an event sequence, supporting a bounded encounter.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC06R01L02","evidence":"Dependencies and assignments are stated, but correct action jointly depending on roles, props, cues, conditions, and order is not.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC06R01L03","evidence":"No tacit-expectation mismatch among people observing the same facts is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario contains no local association-learning process or connection-capacity mechanism.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07R01L01","evidence":"No local endpoint-co-occurrence learning update is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07R01L02","evidence":"No association-formation effects from timing, spacing, repetition, context, and intensity are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07R01L03","evidence":"No harmful learned shortcut or false dependency from incidental co-occurrence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07R01L04","evidence":"No cumulative coupling update or bounding mechanism is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07R01L05","evidence":"No limited connection capacity or removal of unused links is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario names organizations and vendors but provides no evidence that artifact module seams map to organizational boundaries.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R01L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams or their mapping to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R01L02","evidence":"No producer reorganization preserving an old artifact topology is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R02L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams or their mapping to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R02L02","evidence":"No desired architecture requiring frequent coordination across weak links is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R03L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams or their mapping to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R03L02","evidence":"No unchanneled concentration of integration work is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R04L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams or their mapping to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R04L02","evidence":"No fragmented user journey or whole-system behavior caused by local optimization is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R05L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams or their mapping to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R05L02","evidence":"No difference between informal communication networks and reporting structures is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R06L01","evidence":"No artifact module seams or their mapping to organizational boundaries are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R06L02","evidence":"No coordination-overhead-caused artifact failure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC08R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC09","confidence":0.95,"reason":"A later investigator must reconstruct an event without the original simulator context, but the scenario does not establish meaning based on social or institutional context.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC09R01L01","evidence":"Years later, investigators must recreate and replay a completed session using a different simulator.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC09R01L02","evidence":"No dependence on local norms, relationships, language, embodiment, or institutional context is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC09R01L03","evidence":"Screen text and selected tables are insufficient, but ease of misinterpretation outside the setting is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC09R01L04","evidence":"Exports lose links, ordering, and identities, but stripping of meaning-bearing contextual surround is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No replicas or replica convergence and recovery contract are described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC10R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes archival interchange, not replicas or an incomplete replica convergence, conflict, tombstone, and recovery contract.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario describes dependencies between decisions but not a fault-tolerant multi-participant agreement decision.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01L01","evidence":"No participants proposing or acknowledging values for one logical decision are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01L02","evidence":"No safety violation from different correct participants deciding differently is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01L03","evidence":"No independent participant or communication-path failures during decision are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01L04","evidence":"Long-term replay is required, but persistence of one decision across retries, leadership changes, or recovery is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01L05","evidence":"No availability-versus-consistency partition tradeoff is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01L06","evidence":"No changing membership or validity of earlier votes or log entries is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario describes incomplete export structure, not source-class-dependent use of a commingled information store.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12R01L01","evidence":"No commingled information store is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12R01L02","evidence":"No use dependent on source class is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12R01L03","evidence":"No indirect or degraded source cues are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12R01L04","evidence":"No fluency being mistaken for evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12R01L05","evidence":"Discrepancies affect accreditation and findings, but errors of the specified source-evaluation process are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The cross-simulator archival transfer requires preservation of structured state, but exact total bijection, reverse traceability, and change stability are not fully specified.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13R01L01","evidence":"A session is exported to an archive and loaded into a different simulator, with restoration required to reproduce ordered decisions and state transitions.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13R01L02","evidence":"Object identities must not be lost, but exactly one target counterpart for every source member is not explicitly specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13R01L03","evidence":"No requirement that every governed target be reached by a source is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13R01L04","evidence":"Restoration and replay are required, but backward traceability and a fully defined round trip are not explicitly stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13R01L05","evidence":"No additions, removals, splits, merges, or renames during the mapping are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30BC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QF37A82A5F30B"}