{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario contains no identifiable host position, turnover state, or occupant-to-site assignment evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC01R01L01","evidence":"No host position or changing occupants are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC01R01L02","evidence":"No site with independent constraints or affordances is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC01R01L03","evidence":"No vacancy, assignment, release, or turnover states are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC01R01L04","evidence":"No occupant-to-site assignment or fit decision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC02","confidence":0.96,"reason":"The scenario shows harmful conclusions, but does not establish the specified pre-release checking structure, automatic invariants, or cost comparison.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC02R01L01","evidence":"Checkout failures are described, but no output is stated to be used before external review.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC02R01L02","evidence":"The scenario does not identify a small input, transfer, calculation, or sequencing error causing large downstream failure.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC02R01L03","evidence":"No automatically checkable invariant, relation, redundant encoding, or balance is specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC02R01L04","evidence":"No comparison between the cost of a false pass and checking before release is given.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly presents a status-category dispute, an appearance-to-reality upgrade, and resulting conflation of evidence and harmful overconfident decisions.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R01L01","evidence":"Participants explicitly characterize green as a screen experience, monitoring observation, inference, official declaration, and not proof of actual completion.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R01L02","evidence":"The commander rules green proves health; the log collapses distinct statuses into “available,” leading to cancelled escalation and continued traffic.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R02L01","evidence":"No first-person report and externally standardized measurement are stated to systematically diverge.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R02L02","evidence":"The specified report-measurement divergence is not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R03L01","evidence":"A green console appearance is treated as proof that the service itself is healthy, and distinct meanings are combined under “available.”","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R03L02","evidence":"The upgrade produces a record unable to distinguish displayed, inferred, official, and actual states, alongside overconfident operational decisions.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R03","route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R04L01","evidence":"Appearance is upgraded to proof rather than dismissed for lacking objectivity.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC03R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a replicated shared-state system, consistency mechanism, or replica-related impact.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01L01","evidence":"No multiple actors observing or mutating logically shared state are specified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01L02","evidence":"No lagging, divergent, reordered, or incomplete-copy read is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01L03","evidence":"No delay or partition decision about coordination, stale reads, merging, or rejection is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01L04","evidence":"No client consistency invariant is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01L05","evidence":"No consistency model is advertised.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01L06","evidence":"No replica lag, conflict, repair, or split-brain incident is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario describes status interpretation, not a source account with established systematic distortion and component-wise reliability.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05R01L01","evidence":"No receiver is stated to rely on a source reporting an otherwise uninspectable reality.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05R01L02","evidence":"No systematic distortion is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05R01L03","evidence":"The scenario does not characterize an account as containing useful information despite distortion.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05R01L04","evidence":"No differing reliability among parts of an account is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05R01L05","evidence":"No telling-order, emphasis, or framing mismatch with event order or causal structure is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No consolidated-flow trunk or terminal endpoint distribution structure is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC06R01L01","evidence":"No high-volume consolidated trunk is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC06R01L02","evidence":"No many-endpoint terminal branching structure is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC06R01L03","evidence":"No local endpoint completion requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC06R01L04","evidence":"No comparison of upstream throughput with verified endpoint completion is given.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not concern persistence beyond reliable observation or ambiguity between absence and termination.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC07R01L01","evidence":"No entity persistence or loss of continuous observation is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC07R01L02","evidence":"No temporary absence and true termination are described as confusable.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a latent hazard path, rare joint configuration, or interacting safeguards.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L01","evidence":"No hazard source, protected target, or conditional safeguard path is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L02","evidence":"No rare joint configuration, handoff, override, or timing overlap is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L03","evidence":"No one-factor testing or unsafe integrated behavior is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L04","evidence":"No locally safe change completing a latent path is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L05","evidence":"No risk estimate based on multiplying marginal probabilities is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L06","evidence":"No redundant barriers or teams assumed independent are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01L07","evidence":"No higher-order interaction state space or testing coverage is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC09","confidence":0.9,"reason":"The availability conclusion depends on regional signals and is disputed, but no need for another party to verify or rerun it is explicitly established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC09R01L01","evidence":"The service owner says the availability inference is assembled from a subset of regional signals.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC09R01L02","evidence":"The scenario does not state that another person, team, regulator, maintainer, reviewer, or future version needs to verify or rerun the result.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC09R01L03","evidence":"The availability conclusion is actively challenged by a developer, and later losses expose the need to distinguish its bases.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario does not describe protected information, policy-compliant payloads, comparative observer access, or a field-based access policy.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC10R01L01","evidence":"No protected fact or policy-compliant payload is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC10R01L02","evidence":"No observers comparing outputs across cases, times, accounts, regions, or query variants are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC10R01L03","evidence":"No access policy enumerating fields or permissions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario contains an internal health declaration but does not establish producer control or benefit over validation, external inspection limits, or a history of missed internal checks.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11R01L01","evidence":"No artifact producer is stated to control or benefit from a validation verdict.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11R01L02","evidence":"No affected external party is stated to lack access to validity evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11R02L01","evidence":"No artifact producer is stated to control or benefit from a validation verdict.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11R02L02","evidence":"No prior internal checks or builder signoffs are described as having missed consequential defects or exclusions.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC11R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No developmental acquisition, experience-dependent target configuration, bounded interval, or durable missed-window effect is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC12R01L01","evidence":"No longitudinal, mechanistic, or comparative acquisition evidence is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC12R01L02","evidence":"No target configuration requiring experience, cue exposure, practice, interaction, or treatment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC12R01L03","evidence":"No opening and closing interval is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC12R01L04","evidence":"No durable disadvantage or altered feasible outcome from missing an interval is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC13","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario concerns an incident status conclusion rather than durable retention of a newly encoded lesson, skill, decision, state, or representation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC13R01L01","evidence":"No newly encoded item is stated to need later retention.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC13R01L02","evidence":"No immediate recall or performance assessment is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC13R01L03","evidence":"No retention trace is described as vulnerable to interference, competing writes, stress, sleep loss, switching, or churn.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF603951E5C0AC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QF603951E5C0A"}