{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C01","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No evidence about replica convergence or recovery contracts.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C01R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not describe replicated-state contracts.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C02","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The scenario does not establish a population proxy or decision stand-in.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C02R01L01","evidence":"Communities differ, but direct working-memory reasoning is not discussed.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C02R01L02","evidence":"No need for a cognitively manipulable population stand-in is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C02R01L03","evidence":"Telemetry is available to analysts; lack of portability is not stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C02R01L04","evidence":"No population proxy or its omissions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C03","confidence":0.96,"reason":"Spread from a small initial group is described, but the scale-transfer conditions are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C03R01L01","evidence":"A small group originated the tactic, but no small-sample result is being used to justify scale-up.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C03R01L02","evidence":"No aggregate rule is applied to individual units.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C03R01L03","evidence":"No normalized metric or fairness assumption is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C03R01L04","evidence":"No model, policy, intervention, or design transfer is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Competitive standings are mentioned, but no collective threshold rule or complementary contribution structure is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01L01","evidence":"No voting, quorum, coalition, or dependency rule is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01L02","evidence":"No collective pass/fail or activation boundary is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01L03","evidence":"No complementary contributions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01L04","evidence":"No hard-to-substitute participant or resource is identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01L05","evidence":"No nominal weight or formal rank is compared with outcome necessity.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01L06","evidence":"No one-unit collective threshold is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C04R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05","confidence":0.98,"reason":"The tactic spread through local interactions, but it is not a useful pattern requiring preservation.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05R01L01","evidence":"The tactic emerged without stated central design, but it is presented as unintended and harmful rather than useful.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05R01L02","evidence":"Match replays, voice channels, and creator clips carry the tactic between communities.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05R01L03","evidence":"Evidence of benefit is not described.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05R01L04","evidence":"The required outcome is to stop further adoption and reduce established use.","status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05R01L05","evidence":"No claim says formalization would harm needed adaptation.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C05R01","route_status":"CONTRADICTED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Telemetry features are listed, but high-dimensional modeling and search constraints are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06R01L01","evidence":"No comparison of variable count with available evidence, compute, or validation budget is given.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06R01L02","evidence":"No weak, correlated, redundant, leaking, or scaling axes are identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06R01L03","evidence":"No in-sample versus out-of-sample performance is discussed.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06R01L04","evidence":"No extrapolation from low-dimensional intuition is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06R01L05","evidence":"No brute-force search problem is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07","confidence":0.94,"reason":"The threat is time-sensitive and spread through social channels, but distributed coordination requirements are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07R01L01","evidence":"The tactic is spreading and qualifier deadlines make timing consequential.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07R01L02","evidence":"Private voice channels and social-group links show interaction channels, but relationship-based resources for the required action are not established.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07R01L03","evidence":"No comparison with formal authority or mass broadcast is given.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07R01L04","evidence":"Willing helpers and unclear coordination roles are not described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07R01L05","evidence":"No need to match needs and resources across actors is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C07R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No requirements infeasibility proof or divergent implementation response is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R01L01","evidence":"No exhaustive analysis or proof of infeasibility is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R02L01","evidence":"No designs or requirement-subset tradeoffs are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R03L01","evidence":"No three-guarantee impossibility is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R04L01","evidence":"No pairwise-compatible but jointly infeasible requirement set is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R05L01","evidence":"No empty feasible region under hard constraints is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R06L01","evidence":"No divergent local exceptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C08R06","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C09","confidence":0.98,"reason":"No activation-cost pathway barrier or competing-pathway acceleration issue is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C09R01L01","evidence":"The scenario describes behavioral spread, not a repeatable activation barrier as the main delay.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C09R01L02","evidence":"No competing pathways or harmful indiscriminate acceleration is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Regional game servers are mentioned, but no shared replicated-state consistency problem is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01L01","evidence":"The scenario does not state that multiple entities mutate logically shared state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01L02","evidence":"No lagging or divergent copy serves reads.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01L03","evidence":"No partition-time consistency decision is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01L04","evidence":"No shared-state invariant is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01L05","evidence":"No consistency mechanism is advertised.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01L06","evidence":"No replica incident or client-visible consistency impact is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario contains no design-dimension or ratio-system evidence.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C11R01L01","evidence":"No relative dimensions are discussed.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C11R01L02","evidence":"No design translation across physical or product contexts is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C11R01L03","evidence":"No hand-tuned sizes or local design exceptions are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C11R01L04","evidence":"No formal ratio system is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario explicitly describes an observable spreading adoption front, time-sensitive impacts, differing downstream communities, and a desired containment-and-decline outcome.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12R01L01","evidence":"The tactic is moving from one regional server into additional player communities.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12R01L02","evidence":"Telemetry distinguishes newly adopting clusters from groups not yet exposed.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12R01L03","evidence":"Adoption before roster deadlines can produce disputed rankings, while later adoption has less impact.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12R01L04","evidence":"Communities differ in moderation, youth-league status, championship connections, and ranked-play relevance.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12R01L05","evidence":"The required outcome is no further qualifier adoption and declining use in established clusters.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C12R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C13","confidence":0.94,"reason":"Timing changes competitive impact, but early binding, compounding advantages, and the delay tradeoff are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C13R01L01","evidence":"The same tactic has greater competitive impact when adopted before, rather than after, a roster deadline.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C13R01L02","evidence":"No scarce or path-dependent position is shown to be durably bound by early action.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C13R01L03","evidence":"No compounding learning, network, standard, reputation, or switching-cost effect is stated.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C13R01L04","evidence":"No stated tradeoff says delay preserves information while losing an option to shape the field.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QF92253D09B02C13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QF92253D09B02"}