{"candidates":[{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No route condition is established by the scenario.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01L01","evidence":"No evidence addresses whether removing a trigger restores a prior state.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01L02","evidence":"No distinct entry and safe-exit thresholds are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01L03","evidence":"No repeated threshold switching or chattering is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01L04","evidence":"No residual internal memory is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01L05","evidence":"No premature withdrawal or relapse mechanism is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01L06","evidence":"No recovery path requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC01R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC02","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario provides no trunk-to-endpoint flow structure.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC02R01L01","evidence":"No consolidated upstream trunk flow is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC02R01L02","evidence":"No branching heterogeneous endpoints are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC02R01L03","evidence":"No endpoint-local completion requirement is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC02R01L04","evidence":"No comparison between upstream throughput and verified endpoint completion is given.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC02R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC03","confidence":0.96,"reason":"Required controls and possible downstream harm are described, but tolerance-moving process variation is not.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC03R01L01","evidence":"The migration packet states that every required control is compliant.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC03R01L02","evidence":"No process variation or declared acceptance tolerances are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC03R01L03","evidence":"A failed assumption could expose customer records or disrupt branch operations.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC03R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC04","confidence":0.84,"reason":"The attacker response is not fully predictable, and the group is described as able to adapt among multiple methods.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC04R01L01","evidence":"The criminal group can alter phishing themes, shift to trusted vendors, or delay action, while the forecast holds its behavior constant.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC04R01L02","evidence":"The group is described as able to alter phishing, shift activity to vendors, and delay until exceptions accumulate.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC04R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC05","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No deputy-authorization or cross-boundary identity-loss mechanism is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC05R01L01","evidence":"No intermediary authority relationship is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC05R01L02","evidence":"No request initiation or manipulation by actors lacking deputy authority is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC05R01L03","evidence":"No deputy credential or channel-trust confusion is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC05R01L04","evidence":"No cross-boundary request path losing originator context is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC05R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The scenario describes a rollout but does not establish any of the specified boundary mechanisms.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R01L01","evidence":"No small change is stated to produce a large treatment or outcome change.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R02L01","evidence":"No ownership handoff or handoff gap is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R02","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R03L01","evidence":"No evidence shows old and new systems cannot safely switch in one step.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R03","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R04L01","evidence":"No comparison establishes that the transition is riskier than both stable endpoints.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R04","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R05L01","evidence":"No endpoint-correct policy with boundary unfairness, confusion, or instability is established.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC06R05","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"SATISFIED","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC07","confidence":0.99,"reason":"The rollout concerns an adaptive criminal group, while decision-makers rely on a static compliance-based forecast.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC07R01L01","evidence":"The criminal group monitors signals and can alter phishing, targets, timing, and methods after the gateway change.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC07R01L02","evidence":"The risk estimate follows one sequence, holds attacker behavior constant, and relies on compliant controls with little discussion.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC07R01","route_status":"SATISFIED"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08","confidence":0.94,"reason":"A rollout and uncertain attacker-related preconditions are described, but premature crossing, assessable preconditions, and ability to stage or abort are not established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08R01L01","evidence":"The bank is considering a gateway replacement rollout across 140 branches.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08R01L02","evidence":"Potential harm is described, but it is not specifically tied to premature crossing.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08R01L03","evidence":"No transition preconditions that can be assessed before crossing are identified.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08R01L04","evidence":"Attacker timing, targets, and methods are uncertain and are held constant in the forecast.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08R01L05","evidence":"No evidence states that the bank can delay, narrow, stage, prepare, or abort based on evidence.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC08R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No multi-participant consensus decision mechanism is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01L01","evidence":"No participants are described proposing or acknowledging values for one logical decision.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01L02","evidence":"No correctness requirement concerning divergent participant decisions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01L03","evidence":"No independently failing decision participants or communication paths are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01L04","evidence":"No persistence requirement across retry, leadership change, or recovery is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01L05","evidence":"No availability-consistency tradeoff during partitions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01L06","evidence":"No changing membership with durable earlier votes or log entries is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC09R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC10","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No activation-cost pathway barrier or harmful competing-pathway acceleration is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC10R01L01","evidence":"No repeatable pathway barrier or activation cost is identified as the main delay.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC10R01L02","evidence":"No competing pathways or indiscriminate acceleration is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC10R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No recurring workaround or undocumented adaptation pattern is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01L01","evidence":"No recurring deviation across cases, sites, teams, or practitioners is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01L02","evidence":"No evidence shows official compliance makes important work impossible or predictably harmful.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01L03","evidence":"No unauthorized workaround with material value is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01L04","evidence":"No leader proposal to suppress a workaround is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01L05","evidence":"No uneven spread of informal exceptions is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01L06","evidence":"No reliance on undocumented adaptations is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC11R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No accumulating time-ordered artifact layers or retention burden is described.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12R01L01","evidence":"No accumulating artifact layers are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12R01L02","evidence":"No age-related loss of artifact capability, reliability, or validity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12R01L03","evidence":"No recurring retention costs or aggregate maintenance burden is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12R01L04","evidence":"No risk from removing old layers is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12R01L05","evidence":"No stale discoverable layers mistaken for current truth are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC12R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]},{"best_route_status":"INCOMPLETE","candidate_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13","confidence":0.99,"reason":"No work-level identity across carriers, editions, or institutional continuity is established.","route_assessments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L01","evidence":"No work requiring identity across multiple carriers or instances is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L02","evidence":"No users acting on a work-level identity are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L03","evidence":"No copies, translations, adaptations, versions, builds, or performances are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L04","evidence":"No continuity threat from institutional handoff, migration, archival, platform, or publication change is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L05","evidence":"No successor, fork, derivative, or edition identity question is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L06","evidence":"No stakeholder disagreement about changed-manifestation identity is described.","status":"UNKNOWN"},{"condition_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01L07","evidence":"No identifiers or metadata resolving only to carriers are described.","status":"UNKNOWN"}],"route_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1CC13R01","route_status":"INCOMPLETE"}]}],"opaque_case_id":"E14QFE5FDA363E1C"}