{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A001__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Neonatal hospital safety","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes the contradiction, distress, defensive responses, and continuing operational consequences without proposing corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"A newly completed audit shows that the chief's established alarm protocol missed several genuine deterioration events."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2a","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The chief becomes tense and sleepless and begins seeking ways to discount the audit."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2b","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"She excludes unfavorable cases, blames documentation, highlights reassuring data, and substitutes a visible refresher for substantive change."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Her protocol is a public professional commitment closely associated with her expertise and authority as unit chief."}],"scenario_text":"Dr. Lena Ortiz, chief of a neonatal intensive-care unit, designed the alarm-escalation protocol used throughout the hospital. She has repeatedly presented its low alert volume as proof that experienced clinicians can eliminate nuisance alarms without compromising safety. A newly completed audit combining monitor logs with patient records shows that the protocol suppressed warnings before seven genuine deterioration events, including two emergency intubations.\n\nOrtiz becomes visibly tense when the findings are discussed and later tells colleagues she has barely slept. She insists the flagged cases are unrepresentative, asks analysts to exclude events with imperfect nursing notes, and attributes the emergencies to inexperienced night staff. In executive meetings, she highlights the audit's reassuring statistics while omitting the missed warnings. She authorizes a highly visible refresher session on documenting alarms but leaves the escalation rules unchanged. Staff members hesitate to challenge her because the protocol is widely regarded as her signature achievement and has supported her reputation as the hospital's leading authority on alarm safety. Meanwhile, suppressed warnings continue to appear in weekly incident reviews.","scenario_title":"The Chief's Alarm Protocol","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses clinical monitoring, patient safety, audit, and hospital-authority vocabulary distinct from the agricultural transfer case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A001__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Sustainable dairy cooperative","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports defensive interpretation, blame, cosmetic labeling, and persistent consequences without suggesting an intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"New isotope and shipping analyses contradict the cooperative's longstanding claim about the origin of its winter feed."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2a","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The founder experiences shame and agitation and immediately tries to make the findings feel less consequential."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2b","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"He attacks the sample, redefines the promise, blames a supplier, selectively circulates favorable data, and makes only a cosmetic package change."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The disputed promise anchors the founder's public moral reputation and the cooperative's legitimacy with members and customers."}],"scenario_text":"For twelve years, Prairie Lantern Cooperative has sold cheese under founder Caleb Voss's promise that its cows receive only locally grown winter feed. That pledge appears on every package and in Voss's speeches about responsible farming. A new isotope analysis commissioned by a major retailer, matched against shipping records, indicates that a feed blend used for three winters contained imported soy associated with cleared forest land.\n\nVoss feels ashamed and agitated when the report arrives, yet quickly argues that the sampled batches were probably contaminated. He tells board members that “local” was always meant to describe the cooperative's values rather than every ingredient, although contracts and old advertisements say otherwise. He blames the feed broker, circulates only the retailer's inconclusive secondary measurements, and approves a package redesign that replaces the specific feed pledge with a green landscape graphic. No purchasing records or supplier practices change. Several member farms privately worry that openly accepting the findings would damage the ethical reputation that attracts customers and justifies the cooperative's premium prices. Retail buyers continue asking for an explanation as additional matching shipments are identified.","scenario_title":"Prairie Lantern's Feed Promise","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses farming, supply-chain, retail-labeling, and cooperative-legitimacy language, with no clinical terminology from the direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A001__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Private specialty-food purchasing","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b022_a15_c3","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement ends with the unresolved purchasing pattern and contains no recommendation, intervention, or corrective procedure.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"A newly issued laboratory certificate contradicts Mara's belief that a favored honey was authentic."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2a","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"She feels embarrassed and unsettled and tries to quiet that discomfort."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2b","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"She discounts the laboratory result, relies selectively on reassuring cues, and blames handling errors."},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c3","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The narrative explicitly establishes that the preference was private, casual, and unrelated to expertise, role, reputation, values, group standing, or any organization."}],"scenario_text":"Mara occasionally orders specialty honey for weekend breakfasts. After enjoying one jar labeled as rare mountain thyme honey, she privately concluded that its sharp taste proved it was authentic and bought six more jars. A laboratory certificate issued after her purchase reports that the batch is mostly inexpensive blended syrup and contains little thyme pollen.\n\nMara feels embarrassed and unsettled when she reads the result. To quiet the feeling, she decides the laboratory probably mishandled the sample, focuses on enthusiastic customer reviews, and tells herself that counterfeit honey could not have such convincing packaging. She ignores the batch number printed on her own jars and blames rough shipping for any unusual test readings. The unopened jars remain in her cupboard, and she continues treating their price and flavor as stronger evidence than the certificate.\n\nHer original opinion was merely a casual, private preference. She had never mentioned it to anyone, claimed knowledge of honey, attached it to her values or reputation, or made a promise or decision for any group. No job, social position, community membership, or organization depends on whether she was right.","scenario_title":"The Mountain Honey Certificate","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case's product-authenticity and laboratory-evidence difficulty while shifting to an isolated household purchase and explicitly removing reputational or institutional stakes."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A001","schema_version":1}