{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b028_a12_c6","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The case concerns competing features within one satellite image, not simultaneous channels organized into lead and supporting roles."}],"case_id":"E15A007__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Wildfire satellite-image analysis","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes the diagnostic failure and its consequences without proposing changes, interventions, or a named solution pattern.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Flame fronts, smoke shadows, roads, clouds, and heat artifacts can each attract attention in the same image."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The faint eastern ignition is meaningful only relative to neighboring vegetation temperatures and the overnight thermal baseline."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Reviewers repeatedly dismiss the true ignition as sensor noise while brighter irrelevant features dominate attention."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Bright overlays and tight incident crops remove wind, terrain, and earlier fire-boundary information needed to interpret the event."}],"scenario_text":"A regional wildfire center reviews a single satellite composite after crews report an unexplained overnight flare-up. The image contains several visually credible candidates for attention: a bright established flame front, smoke shadows, warm roads, thin cloud, and scattered sensor artifacts. The operationally important feature is a faint new ignition east of the containment line, but its significance depends on the cooler vegetation around it, the overnight temperature baseline, and its position relative to the earlier perimeter. Reviewers repeatedly dismiss that patch as noise while their eyes settle on the much brighter western front. The exported incident image compounds the problem. A saturated red alert overlay covers subtle thermal gradients, and a tight crop excludes the slope, prevailing-wind corridor, and yesterday’s boundary. The resulting briefing graphic remains technically derived from the authentic composite, yet it makes an irrelevant hot area look decisive and removes information needed to understand the faint eastern signal.","scenario_title":"The Overlooked Eastern Ignition","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses domain-specific wildfire and remote-sensing language, avoids the archetype name and abstraction labels, and does not reproduce any supplied predicate verbatim."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b028_a12_c6","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The case uses one multispectral manuscript scan; it does not present simultaneous channels needing a lead channel and coordinated subordinate support."}],"case_id":"E15A007__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Conservation analysis of a medieval manuscript","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents the interpretive failure without prescribing imaging, display, conservation, or review practices.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Rubrication, marginal notes, bleed-through, erased writing, and stains all compete as plausible objects of attention in one scan."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The erased place-name is read through comparisons with adjacent letter spacing, ink remnants, and the scribe’s surrounding hand."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The target word is mistaken for parchment damage and overwhelmed by bleed-through and decorative marks."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"High-contrast rendering and a narrow crop remove page sequence, ruling, and marginal annotations that determine the reading’s significance."}],"scenario_text":"A conservation lab is documenting a reused medieval manuscript leaf whose multispectral scan reveals rubrication, marginal calculations, bleed-through from the reverse, scraped writing, and water damage. Any of these marks can look like the discovery a researcher is seeking. The disputed feature is an erased place-name near the lower margin. Its reading depends on the spacing of neighboring letters, residual ink shared with the surrounding hand, the ruled line beneath it, and references continued on the next leaf. Instead, researchers keep classifying the pale strokes as parchment abrasion because dark reverse-side text and a decorated initial command attention. A publication image intensifies the ambiguity: extreme contrast turns weak remnants into isolated black fragments, while a narrow rectangular crop removes the adjacent gloss, page number, ruling pattern, and continuation mark. The scan itself is genuine, but the circulated excerpt makes a decorative flourish appear central and severs the disputed word from evidence that establishes what it records.","scenario_title":"The Erased Place-Name","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Employs manuscript-conservation vocabulary substantially different from the wildfire case, avoids the archetype name and abstract diagnostic terminology, and paraphrases all route conditions."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b028_a12_c6","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"Only one archival scan is examined, and no coordinated set of simultaneous channels is present."}],"case_id":"E15A007__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Archival scan transcription and custody review","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no recommendation or corrective action; it only specifies the failure, the fixed transcription criterion, and collateral information loss.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Seals, ink blooms, cancellations, stains, and the inventory stamp are competing salient marks in one difficult scan."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The serial is explicitly scored by exact standalone transcription and has fixed meaning independent of neighboring marks, page layout, comparison samples, or historical setting."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The true inventory stamp is repeatedly mistaken for water damage while darker marks draw reviewers away."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Thresholding and tight cropping erase custody initials, staple holes, and cancellation marks that matter to the archive’s separate integrity review."}],"scenario_text":"An archive must transcribe a six-character inventory stamp from a badly degraded requisition sheet. The single scan contains several marks that could draw a reviewer’s attention: two circular seals, dark ink blooms, a cancellation slash, water stains, and the faint rectangular stamp itself. The required code is repeatedly missed because its broken characters resemble moisture damage and the heavier seals appear more deliberate. Unlike handwriting attribution or historical interpretation, however, the target is not read relative to neighboring text, page layout, comparison samples, or period conventions. Each character has a fixed standalone value, and success is scored only by an exact match to the serial printed in the rectangle. The distributed scan has nevertheless been aggressively thresholded and cropped. That treatment removes custody initials, staple holes, and overlapping cancellation marks that are consequential to the archive’s separate integrity review, while making a dark circular seal seem like the principal object on the page.","scenario_title":"The Fixed Inventory Code","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case’s archival-image difficulty while shifting to fixed-code transcription, explicitly separates the target from contextual interpretation, avoids the archetype name, and does not copy supplied predicates."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A007","schema_version":1}