{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A007__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Teledermatology referral review","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports competing visual candidates, diagnostic interpretation, missed findings, and lost context without proposing any corrective action or naming the archetype.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Moles, glare, ruler marks, shadows, inflammation, and the referred lesion can each attract attention within the same photograph."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Reviewers judge the lesion relative to adjacent skin, body-site information, and the referral frame."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The referred lesion is overlooked or mistaken for ordinary pigmentation and lighting variation."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Automated square cropping removes surrounding skin, anatomical landmarks, ruler endpoints, and nearby inflammation that materially affect interpretation."}],"scenario_text":"A regional teledermatology service receives close-up phone photographs from rural clinics. Within a single referral image, a dark mole, glare from the flash, ruler markings, hair, inflammation, and the lesion named in the referral can all draw the reviewer’s eye. Clinicians interpret the suspected lesion relative to adjacent skin tone, its position on the body, and the wider referral frame. However, the intake platform converts every upload into a tightly centered square thumbnail. That crop often removes surrounding pigmentation, anatomical landmarks, the ends of the measurement ruler, and nearby redness documented by the clinic. In unevenly lit images, the referred lesion then blends into normal skin variation or is mistaken for a shadow, while a sharper but clinically incidental mark becomes the obvious point of attention. Audits find cases in which the target abnormality was present in the original photograph yet overlooked in review, and the discarded margins contained information that materially changed how its border, size, or significance would have been understood.","scenario_title":"Cropped Teledermatology Referrals Obscure the Referred Lesion","vocabulary_separation_audit":"This case uses clinical photography, lesions, pigmentation, anatomical landmarks, and referral review; the transfer case uses ecological recordings, animal calls, weather, and annotation windows."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A007__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Wetland bioacoustic species monitoring","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes an ecological classification failure and consequential trimming without suggesting equipment, workflow, modeling, or annotation changes.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Frog pulses, insects, birds, rain, machinery, and handling sounds are all plausible objects of attention in one recording."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The rare frog pulse is judged in relation to the ambient sound bed, neighboring calls, time, and habitat."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The target pulse is repeatedly classified as rain or insect noise and missed during noisy periods."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Short extraction windows remove temporal lead-ins, repeating call patterns, weather transitions, and neighboring-species activity needed to understand the event."}],"scenario_text":"Ecologists reviewing overnight wetland recordings must identify a rare frog whose brief pulse overlaps insect chirps, distant birds, rain on reeds, pump motors, and occasional microphone handling. Any of those sounds can become the event an annotator notices first. The frog pulse is normally understood through the ambient sound bed, the spacing of neighboring calls, the time of night, and the habitat recorded at that station. To reduce storage for annotation, the archive retains only a short interval centered on each automated amplitude peak. These extractions frequently cut away the quiet lead-in, the species’ repeating cadence, an approaching rain burst, and calls from nearby indicator species. During windy or rainy periods, the target pulse is consequently tagged as weather or insect noise, while louder incidental events dominate attention. Field checks later confirm that the frog was present at stations marked negative. The retained snippets remain genuine recordings, but their narrow temporal boundaries have removed circumstances that determine whether a faint pulse is biological, mechanical, or meteorological.","scenario_title":"Rare Frog Calls Disappear Inside Trimmed Wetland Recordings","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The transfer case replaces medical-image vocabulary with field acoustics, species calls, weather events, recording stations, and temporal extraction while retaining the same diagnostic structure."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b028_a12_c6","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The case concerns one recording examined as an isolated item, not multiple simultaneous channels needing a lead channel and coordinated subordinate support."}],"case_id":"E15A007__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Wetland bioacoustic species monitoring","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains only observations about isolated classification, missed calls, and discarded recording material; it offers no intervention or archetype terminology.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Several biological, mechanical, and weather sounds in the source recording can plausibly command attention."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c2","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The protocol explicitly classifies each extracted pulse alone and forbids comparison with ambient audio, neighboring events, station context, or metadata."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Rare frog pulses are confused with rain ticks and insects and are absent from many resulting species records."},{"condition_id":"b028_a12_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Peak-centered trimming discards cadence, weather transitions, and adjacent indicator-species calls that would otherwise carry consequential information."}],"scenario_text":"A wetland survey archive contains overnight recordings in which rare frog pulses, insects, birds, rain, pump motors, and microphone bumps can each attract an annotator’s attention. For a rapid labeling study, software cuts a fraction-of-a-second segment around every amplitude peak. The cut routinely discards repeating cadence, nearby animal activity, and the onset of wind or rain, even though those details distinguish biological calls from incidental sounds. The study protocol nevertheless requires each segment to be classified entirely on its own. Annotators are explicitly barred from hearing audio before or after it, viewing the station or time, comparing it with ambient noise, or consulting neighboring detections. Thus the candidate pulse is not interpreted relative to any acoustic surround, baseline, or contextual record. Many faint frog pulses resemble isolated rain ticks or insect clicks and are labeled as noise, while sharper irrelevant sounds receive confident biological labels. Later field observations show the species at numerous locations whose annotation files contain no accepted frog event.","scenario_title":"Isolated Wetland Snippets Produce Context-Free Species Labels","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The near miss deliberately stays in the transfer domain and preserves its ecological vocabulary and difficulty; its explicit isolation rule uniquely reverses the contextual-interpretation condition."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A007","schema_version":1}