{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c3","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"No persuasive campaign or message is involved; Maya's interest and concern arise from the role itself."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"No obstacle has been removed, and the role's original appeal remains intact."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c5","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"The case concerns Maya's own behavior, not disagreement among stakeholders."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c6","condition_set_id":"B5","how_blocked":"The burdens and risks are openly acknowledged rather than concealed behind benefit-only framing."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c7","condition_set_id":"B6","how_blocked":"Maya already understands the concrete advantages and drawbacks; unclear categories or incomparable decision criteria are not causing the delay."}],"case_id":"E15A014__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Professional advancement in an engineering firm","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no recommendation, intervention, solution mechanism, or archetype name.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Maya repeatedly declares that she wants the promotion but withdraws applications, misses deadlines, and inconsistently accepts interview opportunities."},{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The principal role offers authority, recognition, and meaningful work while also provoking intense concern about exposure, scrutiny, and lost technical identity."}],"scenario_text":"Maya, a senior engineer at a midsize consultancy, openly says that becoming a principal is the next career step she wants. The position would give her authority over major projects, recognition for work she already performs, and a chance to shape the firm's technical direction. Yet she also imagines constant client scrutiny, public responsibility for failures, and losing the hands-on engineering identity she values. For three promotion cycles, Maya has opened the application portal, assembled performance evidence, and asked her mentor to review drafts, only to withdraw before the deadline. Once she submitted, then declined two available interview times and let the process lapse. Eligibility rules are clear, and she can describe the role's advantages and burdens in concrete terms. No recruiting campaign prompted her interest, no procedural obstacle has recently changed, and colleagues are not disputing what the job entails. Her manager sees sustained enthusiasm and extensive preparation, followed repeatedly by retreat as the decision becomes immediate.","scenario_title":"The Application Draft That Never Leaves","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses career-promotion language centered on applications, interviews, authority, and professional identity; it is distinct from the wildlife-release setting of the transfer case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c3","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"No outreach or persuasive messaging generated either response; both arise from the impending release."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"There has been no barrier-removal effort, and Leila's conservation purpose remains fully present."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c5","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"The hesitation belongs to one rehabilitation lead rather than opposing stakeholder camps."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c6","condition_set_id":"B5","how_blocked":"Possible loss and personal responsibility are explicitly discussed, not left unspoken beneath an optimistic presentation."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c7","condition_set_id":"B6","how_blocked":"Release criteria and relevant facts are already organized and understood; the postponement does not depend on making unlike considerations comparable."}],"case_id":"E15A014__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Marine wildlife rehabilitation","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement diagnoses conduct and circumstances without proposing any action, technique, or solution.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Leila strongly supports returning the turtle to the ocean yet cancels multiple dates, aborts a transport, and varies her standards as release approaches."},{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Release represents mission success and restored wild life while simultaneously evoking fear of death, guilt, and irreversible responsibility."}],"scenario_text":"Leila directs a small marine-animal rehabilitation center and has spent eighteen months nursing an injured loggerhead turtle back to health. Returning it to open water is the outcome she celebrates in donor updates and the purpose she says makes the difficult work worthwhile. The release would also free scarce tank space for another animal. As each planned date approaches, however, Leila becomes preoccupied with the possibility that the turtle will fail to forage, be struck by a boat, or die beyond observation. She has canceled three releases despite suitable weather and passing veterinary results. On a fourth date, she accompanied the transport halfway to the beach, then ordered the driver back after noticing behavior the veterinarian considered normal. Between dates she speaks eagerly about seeing the turtle swim away, but near departure she demands additional checks not required for previous animals. The clinical thresholds, forecast, and tracking plan are already documented. No publicity campaign created the concern, no logistical restriction was recently lifted, and the feared consequences are openly discussed rather than hidden.","scenario_title":"The Turtle That Keeps Returning to Its Tank","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Shifts from corporate advancement to animal rehabilitation and uses clinical, ecological, transport, and release vocabulary with no shared career-process framing."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c3","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"No persuasive communication is present, so heightened concern cannot be attributed to messaging."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"No difficulty-reduction or barrier-removal event occurs, and the release retains its original significance."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c5","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"There is no stakeholder disagreement; the account focuses on Soren's simultaneous reactions and conduct."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c6","condition_set_id":"B5","how_blocked":"Risks, responsibility, and possible loss are plainly acknowledged rather than omitted from the way the release is presented."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c7","condition_set_id":"B6","how_blocked":"The decision does not stall at all, and the release standards are already explicit."}],"case_id":"E15A014__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Marine wildlife rehabilitation","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement includes no advice, proposed intervention, solution description, or archetype terminology.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Soren consistently completes every release on the agreed date and has never deferred, abandoned, or unevenly pursued the outcome."},{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"He feels intense fulfillment about returning seals to the wild alongside intense fear that they may die after leaving his care."}],"scenario_text":"Soren manages seal releases for a coastal rehabilitation hospital. He describes watching a recovered animal return to the water as the most meaningful part of his job, proof that months of feeding, treatment, and conditioning restored a wild life. He also worries intensely before every release. Once an animal leaves the beach, he can no longer protect it from fishing gear, predators, or a sudden decline, and he feels personally responsible for deaths later reported by tracking tags. These thoughts regularly cost him sleep, even while he looks forward to the moment of release with equal intensity. Despite that strain, Soren has completed every approved release on its scheduled date for the past four seasons. He has never postponed one, abandoned a transport, skipped a required step, or applied the criteria inconsistently. Veterinary thresholds and sea conditions are documented and met before departure. The risks are discussed openly with staff, no promotional message is shaping his reaction, no logistical barrier has recently been removed, and no colleague is pressing a competing interpretation of the outcome.","scenario_title":"Uneasy but Always on Schedule","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case's wildlife-release difficulty and domain while using a different species, institution, hazards, and behavioral history; it remains sharply separated from the direct case's promotion vocabulary."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A014","schema_version":1}