{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A014__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Elective orthopedic care","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents the patient's conduct and competing reasons without proposing any intervention, framework, or next step.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Nora strongly wants the operation but repeatedly cancels appointments, lets preparations lapse, and later restarts them."},{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The same hip operation promises restored mobility while provoking intense fear of complications, dependence, and lost wages."}],"scenario_text":"Nora, a 58-year-old park ranger, says replacing her deteriorated hip is her highest personal priority. She misses leading trail crews, wants to hike with her grandchildren, and becomes animated when describing life without constant pain. Yet she has canceled the operation twice within days of admission. After each cancellation, she regrets it, rebooks the surgical consultation, completes several preoperative appointments, and then lets the authorization lapse again. The same operation also brings vivid fears of anesthesia, infection, months of dependence, and the possibility that a poor result could end her field career. Those concerns are neither hidden nor newly discovered: Nora discusses them candidly, and her surgeon has already provided stable estimates of the clinical risks, recovery time, and likely functional gains. No additional medical result is pending. Even so, her behavior alternates between energetic preparation and abrupt retreat, leaving her family and care team unable to predict whether she will appear for the next scheduled date.","scenario_title":"The Operation Nora Keeps Rescheduling","vocabulary_separation_audit":"This case uses patient-care language—surgery, pain, anesthesia, recovery, and clinical risk—distinct from the media-assignment vocabulary of the transfer cases."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A014__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"International documentary production","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports the filmmaker's decision pattern and stated concerns without recommending persuasion, risk reduction, reframing, or decomposition.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Elias calls the assignment a career-defining ambition but repeatedly requests extensions and alternates between completing and abandoning preparations."},{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"One documentary assignment simultaneously offers creative purpose and recognition while generating serious concern about danger and prolonged family absence."}],"scenario_text":"Elias, an independent documentary filmmaker, has been offered the lead role on a yearlong project following illegal mining across three remote border regions. He calls it the story he entered journalism to tell and talks excitedly about the access, creative control, and chance to produce work with lasting public value. Nevertheless, he has requested four extensions on the contract. During one week he completes hostile-environment training and orders field equipment; during the next he stops answering the producer and tells his partner he will probably refuse. The assignment itself also evokes intense concern about armed checkpoints, unreliable evacuation routes, and being absent while his father’s health declines. These hazards and family consequences are openly acknowledged in the contract discussions, and the dates, insurance, compensation, and security assessments have remained unchanged. Elias is not waiting for a new offer or missing fact. He continues moving toward the assignment and then backing away, while insisting that accepting it remains one of his most important ambitions.","scenario_title":"The Field Contract Left Unsigned","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The transfer case shifts from clinical care to international filmmaking and uses contracts, production access, field equipment, security, and family absence rather than medical terminology."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c3","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The scenario states that no recruiter or promotional campaign is involved, so heightened concern is not a reaction produced by persuasive messaging."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"No obstacle has been removed or simplified; the assignment terms and logistical demands remain unchanged."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c5","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"Mara is the sole subject making the decision, and no disagreement among stakeholders is described."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c6","condition_set_id":"B5","how_blocked":"Both the assignment's appeal and its dangers and personal losses are explicitly and openly acknowledged."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b031_a01_c7","condition_set_id":"B6","how_blocked":"The decision does not stall: Mara signs immediately and proceeds on schedule without interruption."}],"case_id":"E15A014__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"International investigative photography","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement identifies the unusual coexistence of enthusiasm and distress but offers no intervention, recommendation, or solution-oriented framing.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c1","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Mara signs immediately and completes every required preparation steadily, explicitly without delay, withdrawal, cancellation, or uneven follow-through."},{"condition_id":"b031_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The single assignment produces pronounced excitement about meaningful work and equally serious fear about physical danger and separation from her child."}],"scenario_text":"Mara, an investigative photographer, is scheduled to document coastal villages being displaced by organized sand mining. She describes the commission as the most meaningful work she has been offered: it provides rare access, professional recognition, and a chance to record communities usually ignored by national media. The very same assignment also frightens her. She speaks openly about threats previously made against reporters in the region, difficult emergency transport, and six months away from her young son. Her excitement and apprehension are both pronounced, and neither is based on missing information. The itinerary, security assessment, compensation, and family consequences were fully disclosed before she decided. No recruiter or promotional campaign is involved, no logistical obstacle has recently been removed, and no other stakeholder is deciding for her. Despite her distress, Mara signed the contract the day it arrived and has completed training, permits, equipment checks, and departure arrangements steadily and on schedule. She has not postponed, withdrawn, canceled, or followed through unevenly at any point.","scenario_title":"The Dangerous Assignment Pursued Without Delay","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The near miss retains the transfer case's remote-media setting and comparable risk, family, and career pressures while changing the decisive behavioral fact from repeated retreat to uninterrupted execution."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A014","schema_version":1}