{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A016__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Precision electromechanical manufacturing","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports dimensions, inspection results, assembly failures, and rework without proposing design, inspection, or process changes.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Several independently produced components have permitted dimensional, positional, and measurement variation."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"All components pass their respective inspections, yet completed actuator modules fail operating requirements."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Final assembly repeatedly encounters binding and performs sorting, shimming, and rebuilds while suppliers cite conforming records."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Shaft size, bearing position, spacer thickness, housing depth, coating buildup, and inspection rounding combine in the same unfavorable direction."}],"scenario_text":"A manufacturer builds compact actuator modules from shafts, bearings, spacers, coated housings, and purchased gearsets. Each drawing permits a narrow dimensional range, and incoming inspection shows that every lot meets its assigned limits. Machining, coating, and supplier quality records are all signed off. Nevertheless, final assembly reports that roughly 8% of modules bind at operating temperature or require excessive preload. The failures cluster when shafts arrive near their largest accepted diameter, bearing seats are slightly off center, spacers are at the thick end of their range, and housing bores are near their minimum size. Coating buildup and inspection values rounded to the nearest hundredth add further variation. No individual reading is rejectable, but particular combinations leave too little internal clearance after the gearset is installed. The assembly team repeatedly sorts components, adds shims, and rebuilds units to meet torque and thermal-cycle requirements. Suppliers respond to each complaint with conforming inspection reports, while production absorbs missed schedules and a growing queue of partially assembled modules.","scenario_title":"Actuator Modules Bind After Final Assembly","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses concrete manufacturing language about shafts, bores, preload, coatings, and inspections; it does not name the archetype or reproduce any supplied condition sentence."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A016__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"University financial-aid processing","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes processing allowances, missed disbursements, and exception work without recommending workflow, policy, staffing, or system changes.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Multiple offices and systems permit bounded processing delays, rounding, substitutions, and discretionary holds."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Every unit remains within its policy or service window, but some students miss the tuition-disbursement deadline."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The bursar and aid office repeatedly perform manual reconciliation and emergency reviews despite upstream assertions of compliant handling."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Successive delays, amount rounding, document substitution, and adviser discretion consume the available calendar margin."}],"scenario_text":"At a large university, first-year aid packages pass through admissions verification, residency review, scholarship matching, federal-aid calculation, enrollment confirmation, and the bursar’s posting cycle. Each office has an approved processing window, and staff may accept designated substitute documents, round award components to whole dollars, or place a short discretionary hold when records appear inconsistent. During peak enrollment, a recurring group of otherwise eligible students reaches the tuition deadline without usable funds. Admissions may use its full three-day window, residency review another two days, and scholarship staff may wait for a replacement transcript that policy allows. Minor award rounding can trigger a balance check, while an adviser’s permitted hold pushes the record beyond the bursar’s nightly cutoff. Every unit’s audit trail shows timely, policy-compliant handling. Even so, the aid office repeatedly performs manual reconciliations, and the bursar opens emergency reviews to prevent schedule cancellation. Upstream groups point to their service reports, but affected students experience late fees, registration warnings, and repeated requests for documents they already supplied.","scenario_title":"Compliant Aid Reviews Miss the Tuition Deadline","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses higher-education service language and actors unlike the manufacturing case, while avoiding the archetype name and supplied predicate wording."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A016__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"University financial-aid processing","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b069_a11_c4","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement identifies an interface failure and documents non-accumulation of minor variations without suggesting any corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The same multi-office process contains several permitted variations in timing, documents, rounding, and holds."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Admissions and residency records independently pass validation, yet their jointly transmitted status is rejected."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Financial-aid staff repeatedly reconcile rejected records while both upstream offices cite successful validation."},{"condition_id":"b069_a11_c4","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"A trace review explicitly finds that delays, rounding, substitutions, and holds are reset or resolved at each boundary and do not add up across stages."}],"scenario_text":"At the same university, aid packages move through admissions verification, residency review, scholarship matching, federal-aid calculation, enrollment confirmation, and bursar posting. These units retain their approved processing windows and may use designated substitute documents, whole-dollar award values, and brief discretionary holds. A recurring set of eligible students nevertheless receives an “unverifiable status” rejection after admissions and residency data are combined. Admissions legitimately records recently naturalized students as “domestic—documentation pending,” while residency policy legitimately records them as “in-state—verified.” Each value passes its originating system’s validation, but the aid platform rejects that particular pairing. Financial-aid staff repeatedly reconcile the records by hand, even as both upstream offices produce clean audit reports and cite successful completion checks. A trace review found no buildup of small delays or adjustments: elapsed-time counters restart at every handoff, substitute documents are resolved before export, award remainders are cleared within each calculation, and temporary holds leave no downstream effect. The failures occur even on same-day files with exact-dollar awards and no waivers, isolating the repeated exception to the incompatible status combination rather than accumulated variation across the journey.","scenario_title":"Valid Student Statuses Fail When Combined","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer domain and comparable operational detail, but uses explicit reset and isolation evidence to negate only sequential compounding; no archetype or predicate is quoted."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A016","schema_version":1}