{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A018__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Public-interest legal practice","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes the work demands, interruption sources, and indiscriminate intake norms without proposing boundaries, scheduling changes, filtering, or any other corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Constructing the appellate brief requires integrating a long record, reconciling conflicting testimony, and maintaining a coherent legal argument across sections."},{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Calls, chat messages, walk-ups, calendar alerts, and intake questions repeatedly displace the attorney from the record and force reconstruction of her reasoning."},{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c5","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Office practice makes every intake signal immediately interruptive regardless of urgency or relevance."}],"scenario_text":"A public-interest attorney has four days to draft an appellate brief from a 2,300-page record. The argument depends on connecting small discrepancies across witness testimony, medical exhibits, and three earlier rulings; when she loses the thread, she must reread several pages to recover why a fact mattered. Her office also expects attorneys to answer the shared intake line, acknowledge every team-chat message, respond when staff appear at the doorway, and review each calendar alert as it arrives. Most contacts concern unrelated cases or routine administrative questions, but the office has no meaningful distinction between an urgent filing problem and a request that could wait. During a typical hour, she returns to the record six or seven times and repeatedly finds half-written paragraphs whose logic she can no longer reconstruct. She is working steadily and knows the law, yet the brief remains a collection of locally accurate sections rather than a single defensible account of the case.","scenario_title":"The Brief That Will Not Coalesce","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The direct case uses legal-record, filing, testimony, and appellate-argument language; it does not rely on the rehearsal, ensemble, staging, or musical vocabulary used in the transfer case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A018__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Professional chamber-music rehearsal","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports the rehearsal conditions and their consequences without suggesting signal controls, protected sessions, procedural changes, or other remedies.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The quartet must sustain close listening, shared interpretation, timing judgment, and expressive coordination across a complete movement."},{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Radio calls, phone vibrations, announcements, door entries, and production requests repeatedly stop the ensemble before a full interpretive arc can develop."},{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c5","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Venue custom permits routine and consequential production signals alike to break into rehearsal immediately."}],"scenario_text":"A touring string quartet has one afternoon in an unfamiliar hall to prepare a newly commissioned movement before its premiere. The score’s transitions only make sense when the musicians can carry tempo, balance, and emotional tension across several uninterrupted minutes; isolated passages sound correct but do not reveal whether the whole interpretation holds together. The hall remains in production mode while they rehearse. Stagehands enter to confirm furniture positions, radio calls announce deliveries, phones vibrate with travel updates, lighting staff request brief checks, and front-of-house announcements sound through the room. Some messages concern genuine performance constraints, while others are ordinary logistics, yet venue custom allows each one to stop the players immediately. The quartet has restarted the movement eleven times without reaching its final section. They can execute every difficult bar, but they have not heard how their choices accumulate across the piece, and disagreements about pacing recur because each discussion begins from a different partial run.","scenario_title":"Eleven Restarts Before the Premiere","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The transfer case shifts from legal analysis to live musical interpretation and uses score, tempo, balance, staging, and ensemble language. Its activity and surface cues are substantially different from the direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A018__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Performing-arts costume inventory","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b023_a01_c1","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains only diagnosis-relevant facts and consequences; it does not recommend batching, filtering, workspace changes, or any alternative operating procedure.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c1","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Each scan is independent and mechanically determined, with no carried-over reasoning, interpretation, learning, creative choice, or interpersonal exchange."},{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Radio traffic, door entries, alerts, calls, and questions occur frequently enough that workers cannot maintain even a steady scanning rhythm."},{"condition_id":"b023_a01_c5","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Every incoming cue requires immediate acknowledgment regardless of importance, source, or relation to the inventory."}],"scenario_text":"In the costume department of the same performing-arts complex, two temporary workers must scan 1,800 sealed garment bags before a touring company arrives. The assignment is deliberately mechanical: each bag presents one barcode, the scanner displays either “logged” or “rescan,” and the worker moves to the next bag. No item depends on a previous item, nothing must be interpreted or learned, and the procedure involves no discretion, creative choice, synthesis, or personal exchange. Losing one’s place carries no hidden mental-state cost because the cart and scanner preserve the exact next position. Even so, the room is relentlessly disruptive. Production radios broadcast loading updates, staff enter with unrelated questions, phones sound travel alerts, couriers call from the lobby, and building announcements interrupt the workers every few minutes. Department practice requires immediate acknowledgment of every cue, whether it concerns a missing costume, a routine lunch count, or another team entirely. The workers repeatedly stop and restart, never establish a scanning rhythm, and finish far fewer bags per hour than the equipment normally permits.","scenario_title":"The Interrupted Costume Scan","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The near miss retains the transfer setting’s production radios, touring logistics, and backstage vocabulary, but changes the focal activity to independent barcode transactions and explicitly removes the sustained interpretive demands present in the quartet rehearsal."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A018","schema_version":1}