{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A019__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Regional stormwater infrastructure governance","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents operational consequences and competing interpretations without proposing a rule, process, intervention, or resolution.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The authority records the interconnected equipment as a single regulated facility for reporting and insurance."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Operations, finance, environmental staff, and contractors reach conflicting conclusions about whether the equipment forms one facility."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Hydraulic dependence, ownership, permit coverage, and maintenance responsibility each provide a plausible basis for grouping the assets."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c5","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The identical asset map yields one, seven, or fourteen facilities under different administrative bases."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c6","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Overlapping pressure zones, watersheds, emergency circuits, and maintenance areas create unclear boundaries and responsibility."}],"scenario_text":"A regional water authority inherited a stormwater network containing pump stations, retention basins, control cabinets, sensors, and connecting pipes. Its asset register rolls the equipment into a single regulated facility for annual risk reporting, insurance, and outage statistics. Operations staff defend that treatment because the components are hydraulically interdependent. Finance considers each separately capitalized site independent, while environmental officers group assets by watershed permit and contractors group them by maintenance zone. As a result, the teams disagree about whether the network is one facility or a collection of facilities.\n\nEach basis produces a coherent but different result: the same asset map becomes one facility under the operating permit, seven under ownership records, or fourteen under maintenance contracts. The complications deepen because pressure zones sit inside watersheds, emergency power circuits cross site boundaries, and some pumps serve two drainage areas. After a major failure, no department can state consistently which facility failed, whose reliability score should change, or which budget should absorb repairs. Reports using the same inventory therefore assign different counts and different accountable managers.","scenario_title":"Conflicting Facility Counts in a Stormwater Network","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses infrastructure-specific language—pumps, watersheds, permits, pressure zones, and capitalized sites—without reproducing any supplied predicate or naming the underlying archetype."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A019__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Recorded-music release and rights administration","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes cataloging and rights-accountability failures but offers no recommendation, decision procedure, or corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"A digital package of movements, interludes, and remixes is administered as one release."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The label, collecting society, artists, and platform disagree over whether the package is one album or several works."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Contract scope, continuous performance, authorship, recurring musical material, and platform segmentation support different groupings."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c5","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The same recordings count as one album, six compositions, or eleven tracks depending on the governing convention."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c6","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Suites, movements, samples, remixes, and deluxe editions nest and overlap, obscuring royalty responsibility."}],"scenario_text":"An independent label is preparing royalty statements for a digital release assembled from six movements, spoken interludes, two remixes, and a continuous concert recording. Distribution reports treat the package as one album, so streams, promotional spending, and recoupment are administered under a single release identifier. The collecting society regards the movements as separate compositions; featured artists argue that the uninterrupted concert is one performance; and the platform assigns track-level identifiers to every segment. The parties consequently disagree about whether the delivered material is one album, several works, or a set of unrelated recordings.\n\nSeveral associations appear defensible: shared authorship, recurring musical themes, continuous performance, one label contract, or the platform’s segment boundaries. Using the contract gives one album, composition registrations give six works, and playback segmentation gives eleven tracks, despite identical audio files. A movement also belongs to a named suite, a remix incorporates samples from two movements, and the concert appears inside a larger deluxe edition. Those nested and overlapping memberships leave royalty staff unsure which account owns a stream, which artist bears an adjustment, and where one reporting obligation ends.","scenario_title":"Royalty Reporting for a Composite Digital Release","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The transfer case uses music-industry vocabulary and materially different actors and objects from the infrastructure case, while avoiding supplied wording and archetype terminology."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A019__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Recorded-music release and rights administration","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b047_a04_c2","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains explicit negative evidence for the omitted condition and operational ambiguity elsewhere, but no proposed remedy or intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"All parties administer the delivered audio package as a single release."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c2","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Signed minutes record unanimous agreement that the package is one release, and the scenario explicitly states that nobody disputes this treatment."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Contract scope, continuous playback, authorship, musical motifs, and file segmentation remain plausible ways to associate the recordings."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c5","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Unchanged files still produce one release, five compositions, or twelve track records across established reporting conventions."},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c6","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"A suite, sampled remix, embedded concert, and deluxe edition create nested and overlapping memberships with unclear responsibility."}],"scenario_text":"A label is closing quarterly accounts for a digital package containing five movements, narrated transitions, three remixes, and a continuous live recording. The label, performers, publisher, collecting society, and distributor have all signed meeting minutes affirming that the delivered package is one release for contracting, promotion, recoupment, and commercial reporting. Nobody involved disputes that treatment or claims that the package should instead be administered as several releases.\n\nEven with that consensus, the files support several other associations for downstream records: common authorship, recurring motifs, uninterrupted playback, a shared contract, and separate platform track identifiers. The unchanged package appears as one release in the distributor’s ledger, five compositions in registration data, and twelve track records in usage reports. A movement is also part of a titled suite, one remix samples two movements, and the live recording is embedded in a deluxe edition. These nested and overlapping memberships make responsibility for individual royalty adjustments unclear. Staff cannot consistently tell whether a disputed stream belongs to the suite, remix, live set, or deluxe edition, nor which account should carry the correction.","scenario_title":"Unanimous Release Treatment with Overlapping Royalty Records","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer domain’s specialized vocabulary and difficulty without copying a predicate; explicit consensus cleanly separates the omitted disagreement condition from all remaining evidence."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A019","schema_version":1}