{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A022__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"County nonprofit legal services","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no proposed intervention, recommendation, or description of a remedy.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"A damaging triage review and the founder's resignation undermine the office's founding promise."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Staff retain commitments to patient representation and client voice while grants, deadlines, and centralized intake now reward different behavior."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Personnel can list deadlines, quotas, coverage, and reporting duties but answer questions about their significance with contractual language or silence."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The acting director and her staff are unsure about her identity, authority, obligations, and choices following the leadership change."}],"scenario_text":"Harbor County Legal Aid was founded to keep low-income tenants from facing eviction alone. After a merger with a statewide contractor, the office adopted high-volume court dockets and automated triage. A review then showed that its screening had repeatedly excluded clients with unstable phone access, and the founder resigned. Staff now doubt the promise that once justified long hours and personal sacrifice. They still value patient representation and client voice, yet new grant rules reward closure counts, courthouse deadlines have shortened, and the merged office controls intake. At weekly meetings, lawyers, paralegals, and navigators can recite filing dates, call quotas, hearing coverage, and reporting requirements. When asked what these activities are ultimately serving, answers collapse into “the contract” or silence. The former deputy has become acting director, but she cannot tell whether she is chiefly a defender of the original office, a manager of the merger, or an advocate expected to resist it. Staff likewise do not know which promises she can make, what decisions belong to her, or whether staying expresses loyalty or complicity.","scenario_title":"After the Harbor County Merger","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The case uses legal-aid, court, grant, intake, and merger vocabulary that is distinct from the agricultural language of the transfer cases; no supplied predicate is reproduced verbatim."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A022__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Multigenerational orchard cooperative","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents only the orchard's circumstances and tensions, without suggesting any response or naming a solution pattern.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Disease, repeated crop losses, and removal of heritage trees have made the cooperative's founding account of permanent stewardship hard to believe."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Members remain attached to keeping the land intact while water scarcity, seasonal labor, debt, and crop viability pull operations elsewhere."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Crews precisely list operational work but cannot explain its importance beyond avoiding immediate financial failure."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The founder's grandson becomes interim chair without clarity about his mandate, family position, authority, or freedom to choose the orchard's direction."}],"scenario_text":"Three generations of the Vale family built their orchard cooperative around the claim that careful cultivation would keep the same land productive and intact for those who followed. Five years of drought, a spreading tree disease, and two failed harvests forced the cooperative to remove its oldest groves, buy fruit from outside farms, and lease part of the property for equipment storage. Members still speak fiercely about keeping the acreage together, but scarce water, seasonal labor shortages, debt covenants, and the poor performance of traditional varieties now govern daily decisions. Crews can detail irrigation rotations, pruning blocks, packing schedules, loan payments, and replacement planting. Asked why this exact pattern of work deserves their continued sacrifice, however, they offer only “to make it through the year” and cannot connect the work to a future they believe. When the longtime chair suffers a stroke, his grandson becomes interim chair. He is unsure whether he is a custodian of family inheritance, an employer empowered to abandon old practices, or merely a temporary signer. Relatives and workers disagree about what he owes them, which choices are truly his, and whether accepting the position commits him to preserving an orchard that may no longer be viable.","scenario_title":"The Vale Orchard After the Failed Harvests","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Orchard stewardship is expressed through drought, disease, groves, irrigation, packing, and family succession, with no legal-services terminology or verbatim predicate language."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A022__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Multigenerational orchard cooperative","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b040_a01_c3","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement includes existing shared reasoning as diagnostic evidence but proposes no new action, intervention, or remedy.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Environmental losses and operational compromises have discredited the cooperative's old assurance that its customary farming would preserve the orchard indefinitely."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The cooperative remains divided between inherited land-keeping commitments and current constraints involving water, labor, debt, and unsuitable varieties."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c3","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Workers explicitly and consistently explain that each listed duty protects household income, prevents irreversible land loss, and preserves an informed choice for the next generation."},{"condition_id":"b040_a01_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The interim chair remains unsure of her role, decision rights, obligations, and personal choice after taking over from an incapacitated relative."}],"scenario_text":"The Vale orchard cooperative once promised its families that traditional cultivation would preserve both their livelihood and their acreage across generations. After prolonged drought, tree disease, and repeated crop losses, it has uprooted heritage rows, purchased fruit elsewhere, and leased several fields to a neighboring distributor. That old promise no longer convinces many members. Even so, they remain divided between loyalty to an undivided family property and present conditions shaped by water limits, debt, scarce labor, and varieties poorly suited to hotter seasons. The crews maintain detailed schedules for irrigation, pruning, packing, loan payments, and new plantings. They can also explain clearly and consistently why each duty matters: it protects current household income, prevents a forced sale while options remain open, and leaves the next generation a genuine choice about the land. The uncertainty instead centers on leadership. After the longtime chair becomes incapacitated, his niece accepts the interim post. She cannot determine whether she speaks as a relative, an employer, or a temporary trustee; which commitments she inherited; which decisions require family consent; or whether taking the role obliges her personally to continue farming.","scenario_title":"A Clear Purpose Under Unclear Stewardship","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The near miss deliberately retains the transfer case's orchard, climate, debt, labor, and succession vocabulary while explicitly changing only the evidence about whether workers can state the importance of their duties; no supplied predicate is copied verbatim."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A022","schema_version":1}