{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A024__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Medical appliance manufacturing","intended_route_id":"B3","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes the production problem and its consequences without proposing any corrective action, intervention, or solution pattern.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b021_a06_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The manufacturer cannot see the contract vendor's mold-cell allocation or outside commitments for the specialized seals."},{"condition_id":"HR1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Final assembly relies on delivery of the seals, and loss of the vendor's available molding time would halt assembly and prevent shipment."}],"scenario_text":"A medical-appliance manufacturer is preparing the first commercial run of a new tabletop sterilizer. Engineering validation is complete, regulatory clearance has been received, and the assembly plant has open labor and line time. Each unit still requires a heat-resistant door seal made with a specialized mold owned by a contract vendor. The vendor’s order portal shows an accepted quantity and delivery date, but it reveals nothing about mold-cell allocation, maintenance windows, or commitments to other customers. The manufacturer’s contract manager can obtain only weekly assurances that the order remains scheduled. If the vendor loses available molding time through an equipment outage or a higher-priority production overrun, seal deliveries will stop. No other seal has been cleared for the sterilizer, and units cannot complete pressure testing without it. Finished subassemblies would accumulate at the last station while the commercial launch and hospital shipments slip.","scenario_title":"Sterilizers Waiting at Final Assembly","vocabulary_separation_audit":"This case uses factory, regulatory, molding, assembly, and shipment language, distinct from the museum-conservation vocabulary of the transfer cases."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A024__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Museum exhibition conservation and logistics","intended_route_id":"B3","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents the opening risk and contractual constraint without recommending a response or describing a solution archetype.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b021_a06_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The museum has no visibility into its conservation packer's chamber schedule, staffing allocation, or competing bookings."},{"condition_id":"HR1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The exhibition relies on the packer's available chamber time; loss of that capacity would prevent conditioning required by loan agreements and keep the gallery closed."}],"scenario_text":"A regional museum has finished designing a traveling exhibition of fragile dyed textiles. The objects, gallery, mounts, insurance, and opening-week programming are all confirmed. Before installation, each loan must spend five days in a controlled low-oxygen enclosure prepared by a specialist conservation packer. The museum booked the work through a logistics contractor and received firm collection and return dates, but neither the contractor nor the packer discloses the enclosure schedule, technician allocation, or other institutions competing for the same processing slots. The registrar knows which company is contractually responsible but cannot tell how much processing room is actually available during the narrow installation window. If the packer loses chamber time because of a seal failure, staff absence, or an overlong preceding job, the cases will not be conditioned by the lender’s deadline. The loan agreements then prohibit the textiles from going on display, leaving the principal gallery closed despite the rest of the exhibition being ready.","scenario_title":"A Gallery Ready Except for Its Loans","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The setting and surface terms concern cultural loans, textile conservation, galleries, registrars, and controlled enclosures rather than manufacturing operations."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"HR1","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"The concealed purchasing details do not govern any museum activity or outcome, so there is no relied-on element with a disruptive loss scenario."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"HR1","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The order is not treated as an independent operating element; it is unused contingency stock whose nonarrival changes nothing."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"HR1","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"No load-bearing expectation rests on the cartridges, and total nonperformance by the seller would not affect operations."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"HR1","condition_set_id":"B5","how_blocked":"Although a named registrar owns the purchase, more importantly the purchase is not an operational reliance capable of disrupting an outcome."}],"case_id":"E15A024__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Museum exhibition conservation and logistics","intended_route_id":"B3","omitted_condition_id":"HR1","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement supplies negative diagnostic evidence only; it contains no recommendation, intervention, or solution description.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b021_a06_c3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The museum cannot see the reseller's manufacturer allocations, warehouse stock, or fulfillment priority for conservation cartridges."},{"condition_id":"HR1","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The cartridges are unused contingency inventory, and explicit review confirms that complete vendor nonperformance would affect no object, schedule, control, admission, or revenue."}],"scenario_text":"A regional museum has ordered humidity-buffer cartridges from a conservation-supply reseller while preparing a traveling textile exhibition. The reseller confirms the order but will not reveal which manufacturer will fill it, how much warehouse stock exists, or where the museum sits among competing orders. That lack of visibility has generated anxious weekly discussions because the delivery date falls close to installation. However, the exhibition cases were already conditioned and sealed by the museum’s own conservation staff, and their environmental readings meet every lender requirement without these cartridges. The purchase was made solely as extra inventory for a possible future rotation, not for the scheduled exhibition. The registrar, who owns the order, has checked the object list, installation sequence, loan agreements, and facilities plan. Even if the reseller cancels the order or delivers nothing, no textile, display case, safety control, opening date, admission, or revenue will be affected. The uncertainty concerns an opaque purchase, but nothing in the current program relies on its fulfillment.","scenario_title":"The Late Order That Changes Nothing","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The near miss retains the transfer case's museum-conservation setting and comparable vendor-opacity detail while changing only whether current operations rely on the ordered material."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A024","schema_version":1}