{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t2","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"The chief operating officer's authority over scanner allocation is explicit and undisputed."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"The departments use the scheduled review and do not pursue sponsors, private pressure, or other bypasses."}],"case_id":"E15A026__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Regional hospital diagnostic-imaging operations","intended_route_id":"B2","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports the operational conflict and its cause without recommending any action or intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Earlier allocation outcomes remained unsigned meeting conclusions, never became controlling policy, and produced no scheduling-rule changes, causing the same argument to return."},{"condition_id":"HR2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Interdependent emergency, oncology, and radiology services contest a shared resource because hospital-wide timeliness, clinical-priority, and staffing obligations point toward incompatible allocations."}],"scenario_text":"A regional hospital has one MRI scanner capable of handling both emergency neurological imaging and the specialized sequences required by its growing oncology service. Every month, emergency medicine, oncology, and radiology revisit how many protected slots each service receives. The departments depend on the same technologists, contrast pharmacy, and overnight coverage, while hospital-wide targets require rapid stroke assessment and timely cancer staging. Clinical data support both claims under different assumptions about delay risk.\n\nThe chief operating officer is explicitly the final authority for scanner allocation, and all three departments accept the scheduled operations review as the proper venue. No department has approached trustees, donors, or outside sponsors to bypass it. Nevertheless, previous meetings have ended with verbal conclusions that were never signed, entered into the policy register, or reflected in scheduling parameters. Staff therefore continue using older templates, and each service treats the latest discussion as provisional. Cancellations and overtime rise whenever demand peaks because the same priority argument reopens before each monthly schedule is published.","scenario_title":"The MRI Schedule That Never Settles","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses clinical-service, imaging, staffing, and patient-timeliness vocabulary, distinct from the maritime logistics language of the transfer case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t2","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"The harbor master's final authority is established in the port charter and acknowledged by the operators."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"The operators remain on the published docket and do not lobby owners, ministries, or commercial partners outside it."}],"case_id":"E15A026__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Commercial seaport berth and cargo scheduling","intended_route_id":"B2","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no proposed policy, procedural improvement, or other corrective recommendation.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Past priority determinations were left in call notes rather than issued as operative rulings or incorporated into dispatch rules, so the conflict repeatedly returns."},{"condition_id":"HR2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Mutually dependent terminal operators contest berth, crane, rail, safety, and customs obligations affecting port-wide throughput."}],"scenario_text":"At a tidal seaport, a grain terminal and a refrigerated-cargo operator repeatedly claim the same deepwater berth, crane crew, and outbound rail window. Grain vessels must load during narrow draft conditions to avoid demurrage, while refrigerated medical shipments face customs deadlines and temperature-control limits. Moving either call affects tug availability, yard congestion, and the port's published vessel sequence, so neither operator can act independently without disrupting harbor-wide throughput and safety commitments.\n\nThe port charter plainly gives the harbor master final scheduling authority, and both operators recognize the public allocation docket as the proper channel. They have not appealed privately to shipping-line owners, trade ministries, or port investors. Yet the last four docket meetings ended with priorities stated aloud and summarized only in informal call notes. None became an operative ruling or changed the dispatch table used by pilots and terminal controllers. On each congested tide, both operators cite a different prior conversation, planners rebuild the sequence under time pressure, and connected rail and trucking appointments are lost.","scenario_title":"Recurring Claims on the Deepwater Berth","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses tides, berths, cranes, pilots, rail windows, customs, and cargo vocabulary rather than the direct case's clinical terminology."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t2","condition_set_id":"B1","how_blocked":"The port charter unambiguously assigns the harbor master final authority, and all parties acknowledge it."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t4","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"The matter remains on the ordinary docket without private appeals, hierarchy shopping, publicity pressure, or strategic delay."}],"case_id":"E15A026__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Commercial seaport berth and cargo scheduling","intended_route_id":"B2","omitted_condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t3","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes existing facts and the present conflict without suggesting a response.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t3","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Every earlier determination was signed, controlling, incorporated into dispatch software and operating instructions, and followed without reopening."},{"condition_id":"HR2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Interdependent port actors face a port-wide conflict among hazardous-cargo safety evidence, berth access, pilotage limits, and statutory service commitments."}],"scenario_text":"At the same tidal seaport, the first hydrogen-fueled cargo vessel is due during a week of heavy traffic. Its provisional safety case calls for a wide exclusion zone while bunkering, but enforcing that zone would close the only berth able to receive a scheduled refrigerated medicine shipment and would constrain the turning basin used by two grain vessels. Pilots, the fuel contractor, terminal controllers, and customs officers rely on one another's timing. They agree on the port's overall safety and service commitments but disagree over whether the new hazard evidence justifies displacing already confirmed calls.\n\nThe harbor master has undisputed final authority, and the operators have placed the matter on the ordinary allocation docket. No participant is seeking a private appeal, publicity campaign, owner intervention, or delay. Earlier berth-priority determinations are all signed, controlling, stored in the official register, and encoded in dispatch software and operating instructions; comparable rulings have been followed without reopening. The present clash is new because none of those determinations addressed hydrogen bunkering or its proposed exclusion radius, leaving the upcoming vessel sequence uncertain.","scenario_title":"A First-of-Its-Kind Hydrogen Port Call","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Preserves the transfer case's maritime complexity and surface vocabulary while avoiding the archetype's name and supplied predicate wording."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A026","schema_version":1}