{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b034_a11_c6","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"This is the first formal substantiation of the revised component, and the scenario explicitly states that no earlier internal clearance has later proved defective or materially incomplete."}],"case_id":"E15A028__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Commercial aerospace component certification","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents the verification conflict and inaccessible support without proposing any reviewer, audit, disclosure, governance change, or other intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b034_a11_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The supplier authored the safety case, chooses which test results enter it, makes the compliance declaration, and gains commercially from approval."},{"condition_id":"b034_a11_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Airlines, crews, and passengers cannot examine the underlying measurements, rejected runs, or analysis files."}],"scenario_text":"An aerospace supplier has redesigned a flight-control actuator for several regional jets and says its accelerated fatigue campaign demonstrates the required service life. The supplier’s engineering group wrote the safety case, selected which bench runs counted as representative, and retains final authority to issue the compliance declaration. Approval would release milestone payments and prevent an expensive redesign, while a failed conclusion would delay deliveries and expose sunk tooling costs. The airline customers receive a short assurance summary, but the raw sensor traces, excluded runs, simulation parameters, and failure photographs remain inside the supplier’s proprietary data room. Flight crews and passengers have no access to them either. Regulators are being asked to accept the submitted conclusion based on the supplier’s presentation of those materials. This is the first formal substantiation of the revised actuator: no previous internal clearance for this design has later been shown to contain a consequential defect, a fitted-to-the-test assumption, or an undisclosed scope limitation. The immediate concern is whether the service-life claim deserves reliance when its author also controls the evidentiary record and the declaration built from it.","scenario_title":"Service-Life Claim for a Redesigned Flight-Control Actuator","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses engineering, fatigue-testing, compliance, and aviation-stakeholder language; it shares no art-market objects, roles, or provenance terminology with the transfer cases."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b034_a11_c6","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The scenario states that this is the work's first authenticity determination and that no prior internal screening or signoff has subsequently been exposed as consequentially wrong or incomplete."}],"case_id":"E15A028__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Online fine-art auction and provenance assessment","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement identifies the disputed reliance conditions but does not suggest outside appraisal, document access, recusal, governance reform, or any other response.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b034_a11_c1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The auction platform assembled the dossier, awards its own authenticity badge, and earns a commission only if the attributed work sells."},{"condition_id":"b034_a11_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Bidders and the artist's heirs receive only a narrative summary and cannot inspect the private letters, scans, or comparison images supporting the attribution."}],"scenario_text":"A large online auction platform is offering a newly surfaced painting as an early work by a celebrated modernist. Its in-house provenance desk assembled the ownership history, compared signatures, interviewed the consignor, and awarded the platform’s highest authenticity badge. The same company will collect a substantial percentage of the sale price, which depends heavily on the attribution, and its specialists decide whether contrary materials are included in the final catalogue entry. Prospective bidders see a polished chronology and several favorable excerpts. They cannot examine the underlying private letters, high-resolution ultraviolet scans, comparison images, or the full transcript of the consignor interview because the platform cites confidentiality and trade-secret restrictions. The artist’s heirs, whose catalogue may be affected by the sale, are given no greater access. This is the painting’s first authenticity determination; no earlier screening or platform signoff has later been exposed as materially mistaken, tailored to a narrow sample, or qualified by a hidden exclusion. Buyers must decide how much weight to place on a lucrative attribution when the business issuing it also curates the unseen record behind it.","scenario_title":"A Lucrative Attribution Behind a Sealed Provenance File","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses auction, attribution, provenance, catalogue, bidder, and imaging language, substantially separated from the actuator, fatigue, regulator, and aircraft vocabulary of the direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b034_a11_c1","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The dossier compiler has neither decision authority over the catalogue ruling nor a financial, career, funding, ownership, or reputational interest in its outcome."}],"case_id":"E15A028__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Museum provenance research and catalogue adjudication","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b034_a11_c1","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports the existing allocation of roles and access restrictions solely as case facts; it recommends no new review, disclosure, safeguard, or intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b034_a11_c1","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The researcher who produced the dossier cannot vote, set the ruling, filter submissions, or benefit from acceptance or rejection; a separate catalogue council exclusively decides."},{"condition_id":"b034_a11_c4","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Collectors and descendants affected by the ruling cannot inspect the restricted archival documents, laboratory images, or complete interview records."}],"scenario_text":"A museum researcher has compiled a provenance dossier for a disputed modernist painting that may be added to a widely used catalogue of known works. The file combines shipping records, family correspondence, pigment images, and interviews with former owners. Collectors holding visually similar paintings and descendants contesting the ownership history will be affected by the catalogue ruling, yet donor restrictions prevent them from seeing the correspondence, full interview recordings, or laboratory images. They receive only a condensed narrative prepared for publication. The researcher, however, has no authority over the ruling: a separately constituted catalogue council receives the complete file, controls its own agenda, and alone votes on inclusion. The researcher cannot remove contrary submissions, participate in deliberations, or appeal the result. Their salary, funding, promotion prospects, and publication credit are fixed regardless of whether the painting is accepted, and neither they nor the museum owns the work or receives proceeds tied to its status. No earlier internal assessment of this painting has subsequently been revealed as consequentially flawed. The concern is therefore opaque evidence for affected outsiders, not a dossier author steering or profiting from the verdict.","scenario_title":"Restricted Records in a Disputed Catalogue Ruling","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case's provenance, attribution, restricted-record, and affected-collector difficulty while changing the decisive role and incentives; it remains lexically distinct from the aerospace direct case."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A028","schema_version":1}