{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t4","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The case explicitly excludes recurring alarms, fixed status screens, and declining sensitivity from repetition."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t5","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"Personnel have not been given a generic vigilance instruction; the difficulty arises from competing blood-bank duties."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t6","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"The scenario states that no consolidated observability or alerting platform exists."}],"case_id":"E15A032__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Overnight regional blood-bank operations","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes signals, workload, and consequences only; it proposes no procedure, technology, staffing change, or other intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Rare temperature drift, courier slippage, and late antibody findings appear quietly within ordinary records and calls."},{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Technologists cannot continuously inspect all sources while performing time-critical laboratory work, and attempting it causes fatigue and errors."},{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Misses can spoil units or delay transfusions, while unwarranted escalations interrupt testing and consume scarce inventory."}],"scenario_text":"An overnight regional blood bank receives routine refrigerator logs, courier updates, hospital requests, and antibody-screen results from several facilities. Most entries are uneventful. A consequential change may appear as a slight temperature drift, a quietly delayed courier, or a late antibody finding buried among ordinary records and telephone calls. The two technologists on duty must also type specimens, prepare units, and answer urgent compatibility questions. Watching every feed and message continuously would prevent them from completing those time-critical tasks; when they have tried to divide attention that finely, fatigue and transcription mistakes rise before the shift ends. Missing a genuine change can spoil scarce blood products or delay a critical transfusion. Treating every small irregularity as urgent is damaging too: unnecessary calls interrupt testing, units may be held back without cause, and hospitals lose confidence in escalations. There are no recurring alarm tones or fixed status screens, and staff report no decline in sensitivity caused by repetition. No one has simply instructed the technologists to “stay vigilant,” and no consolidated observability or alerting platform currently exists.","scenario_title":"Quiet Exceptions on the Night Blood-Bank Shift","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses transfusion, specimen, compatibility, refrigerator, courier, and blood-product language; it does not use agricultural vocabulary from the transfer case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t4","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The scenario expressly rules out repetitive warnings, stable control displays, and sensitivity loss over time."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t5","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"Field crews have not been told merely to remain watchful."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t6","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"No sensor dashboard or automated warning service is present."}],"case_id":"E15A032__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Commercial orchard frost and pest surveillance","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no recommendation about sensors, scouting schedules, staffing, thresholds, or escalation practices.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Early threats are rare and subtle, including isolated cold pockets, faint leaf stippling, and scattered insect residue."},{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Inspecting every tree and microclimate continuously is physically impossible and would expose workers to unsafe conditions."},{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t3","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Late discovery can destroy fruit or spread infestation, whereas mistaken suspicions waste labor, fuel, water, and treatments."}],"scenario_text":"A family-run orchard spans several hundred acres of uneven ground, with low pockets that cool faster than the rest and isolated blocks that attract different insects. The first meaningful signs are uncommon and easy to overlook: faint stippling on a few leaves, residue beneath one branch, or a short temperature dip confined to a hollow before dawn. These clues blend into normal variation in weather, foliage, and fruit development. The same crews who walk the rows also prune, irrigate, repair fencing, and coordinate harvest shipments. Inspecting every tree and microclimate without interruption is physically impossible, and prolonged night patrols on steep, wet ground would create injury risk and leave workers exhausted for daytime operations. Discovering a real frost pocket or infestation too late can ruin a block of fruit and allow damage to spread. Acting on every harmless blemish or transient chill also carries substantial expense through diverted labor, fuel, water, and unnecessary treatment. The orchard has no repetitive warning tones, fixed control display, sensor dashboard, or automated warning service. Workers have not been issued a blanket instruction merely to remain watchful, and no loss of sensitivity from repeated warnings has occurred.","scenario_title":"Subtle Threats Across a Working Orchard","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses acres, foliage, frost pockets, insects, irrigation, terrain, and harvest operations, making its setting and surface vocabulary substantially different from the clinical-logistics direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t4","condition_set_id":"B2","how_blocked":"The statement excludes recurring alarms, stable displays, and any sensitivity decline due to repetition."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t5","condition_set_id":"B3","how_blocked":"Researchers have not been directed simply to keep watch."},{"blocked_by_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t6","condition_set_id":"B4","how_blocked":"The plot has no automated observability or alerting apparatus."}],"case_id":"E15A032__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Botanical phenology research plot","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t3","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement remains purely diagnostic and offers no equipment, workflow, cadence, staffing, or escalation proposal.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t1","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Scientifically notable events are brief, sporadic, subtle, and embedded in ordinary plant variation."},{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t2","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Continuous inspection of thousands of plants is infeasible, unsafe at night, and exhausting alongside other research duties."},{"condition_id":"b003_a09_alr_t3","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"The scenario explicitly states that missing an event causes no operational, financial, safety, or decision consequence, although false reports consume effort."}],"scenario_text":"A university phenology plot contains thousands of individually tagged plants distributed across sloped outdoor beds. Researchers value occasional observations such as an unusually early bloom, a brief color change after a cold night, or a rare pollinator visit. Such events are sporadic, subtle, and mixed with ordinary differences among leaves, flowers, shadows, and weather. Graduate assistants who inspect the beds must also collect soil samples, maintain labels, enter measurements, and support unrelated experiments. Keeping every plant under uninterrupted observation is infeasible, while extended night inspection on damp slopes would be unsafe and would exhaust the assistants before their laboratory work. Crucially, an unrecorded event has no operational, financial, safety, or decision consequence: the dataset permits gaps, no contractual result depends on complete capture, and missing one occurrence does not invalidate the study. Mistaken reports still consume several hours of verification and specimen handling. The plot has no recurring alarms, unchanging control display, or automated warning apparatus, and no one reports becoming less responsive through repetition. The assistants have not been told simply to keep watch; the difficulty follows from the scale and fleeting nature of the observations.","scenario_title":"Fleeting Observations in a Phenology Plot","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case’s outdoor, distributed, plant-level difficulty while shifting from commercial crop protection to academic observation; it remains lexically distinct from the blood-bank case."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A032","schema_version":1}