{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A034__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Emergency medicine and hospital incident review","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports the judgment process and operational consequences without recommending any intervention or naming a corrective method.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_affect_evidence_separation_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"As the physician's alarm intensifies, his confidence in a deliberate dosing error rises from suspicion to near certainty, although the available records remain incomplete and ambiguous."}],"scenario_text":"During an overnight emergency-department shift, a child deteriorated soon after receiving medication. The attending physician was already shaken by a serious dosing incident earlier in his career. Seeing the child's blood pressure fall brought back the same dread, and he quickly became convinced that a nurse had administered ten times the ordered amount. As his alarm grew, he described the overdose first as likely, then as virtually certain, and began treating the event as deliberate concealment when the nurse could not immediately locate a discarded vial. The available chart showed only the prescribed dose. The automated cabinet recorded a normal withdrawal, but its clock had recently been reset, and the infusion pump's log for that interval was missing. Several other causes of the decline were still plausible, while no witness had seen the preparation. Nevertheless, the physician's increasing fear supplied most of his confidence, and his accusation triggered the nurse's removal from the shift before the medication quantity had been established.","scenario_title":"Certainty After a Pediatric Deterioration","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses clinical roles, medication records, physiological decline, and hospital operations; it does not rely on the museum, provenance, collection, or attribution language used in the transfer pair."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A034__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Museum acquisition and artifact authentication","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement contains no proposed procedure, expert referral, decision rule, or other remedy; it ends with the unresolved acquisition consequence.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_affect_evidence_separation_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"The curator's mounting excitement makes her increasingly certain that the object is genuine even though its ownership history, dating, and attribution remain weakly supported."}],"scenario_text":"A regional museum is considering an expensive bronze figurine offered by a private collector. The acquisitions curator has spent years searching for an object linked to a little-documented coastal workshop, and the figurine resembles a damaged sketch she discovered early in her career. When she first viewed it, she called the attribution an intriguing possibility. After holding it and noticing a wave pattern like the one in the sketch, she became exhilarated and began speaking of the match as conclusive. By the end of the visit, her excitement had turned a tentative identification into certainty that the museum had found the workshop's only surviving bronze. The ownership history begins with an undocumented sale in the 1980s. Preliminary alloy readings fit several regions and centuries, the surface wear could be natural or manufactured, and no inscription identifies a maker. Two photographs sent by the seller are too compressed for close comparison. Despite those gaps, the curator commits acquisition funds and presents the object to trustees as unquestionably authentic because the encounter felt increasingly momentous.","scenario_title":"The Long-Sought Bronze","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The transfer case shifts from acute clinical harm to cultural-property acquisition and uses provenance, alloy, attribution, trustees, and workshop vocabulary, creating substantial surface separation from the direct case."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A034__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Museum acquisition and artifact authentication","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"ext001_affect_evidence_separation_a01","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes an unresolved judgment and explicitly reports confidence behavior, but offers no recommendation, corrective technique, or intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_affect_evidence_separation_a01","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Although the curator becomes increasingly excited and personally invested, she explicitly keeps her confidence low and does not become more certain while the supporting record remains sparse."}],"scenario_text":"A regional museum is considering an expensive bronze figurine offered by a private collector. The acquisitions curator has spent years searching for an object linked to a little-documented coastal workshop, and the figurine resembles a damaged sketch she discovered early in her career. Holding it and seeing a familiar wave pattern produces an intense rush of excitement; she calls the encounter the most affecting moment of her professional life and admits that she wants the attribution to be true. Yet her stated confidence remains low throughout the visit. Even as her enthusiasm rises, she continues describing the connection as speculative and tells the trustees that her emotional investment has not made authenticity more likely. The ownership history begins with an undocumented sale in the 1980s. Preliminary alloy readings fit several regions and centuries, the surface wear could be natural or manufactured, and no inscription identifies a maker. Two seller photographs are too compressed for close comparison. The trustees must decide whether to reserve acquisition funds while the curator remains deeply moved but expressly uncertain about the object's origin.","scenario_title":"Excitement Without Attribution Certainty","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer case's museum setting, provenance gaps, ambiguous material findings, financial stakes, and emotional intensity while reversing only the relationship between that intensity and confidence."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A034","schema_version":1}