{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A036__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Cloud document-processing platform","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents operating evidence and consequences without proposing controls, configuration changes, or other corrective action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_rate_limiting_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Signed tenant credentials identify the retailer, and that tenant can submit 18,000 files per minute against a safe processing capacity of 4,500 per minute."}],"scenario_text":"A regional accounting platform converts uploaded invoices into searchable records for several hundred business customers. Every upload request carries a signed tenant credential, and operations logs retain the tenant identity throughout processing. Normal demand stays below 4,500 files per minute, the highest sustained arrival volume the validation cluster can handle without delaying other customers or exhausting its work queue. During quarterly closing, one large retailer’s integration can submit roughly 18,000 files per minute for several minutes. Those bursts occupy nearly all validation slots, push the queue beyond its stable operating range, and cause unrelated customers’ documents to remain unprocessed for hours. Engineers have ruled out malformed files, unusually expensive documents, and failures in the storage layer. Replaying the same number of retailer files gradually produces no incident; the disruption appears only when that authenticated tenant sends them in a concentrated interval.","scenario_title":"Quarter-End Invoice Surge","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses tenant authentication, uploads, validation slots, and processing queues; it does not name the archetype or reproduce the supplied predicate."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A036__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Agricultural irrigation canal","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports canal measurements, ownership records, and agricultural effects without recommending infrastructure, scheduling, enforcement, or policy changes.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_rate_limiting_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"A numbered turnout identifies each farm, while one orchard can withdraw 3.5 cubic meters per second despite a 1.2-cubic-meter-per-second sustainable allowance."}],"scenario_text":"A cooperative canal supplies orchards along a dry valley during the six-week fruit-sizing season. Each farm receives water through a numbered turnout recorded on the district map, and meter readings are associated with the registered operator of that turnout. Hydraulic surveys show that the channel can replenish a farm’s allocation sustainably when an individual turnout draws no more than 1.2 cubic meters per second. One upstream orchard owns a high-capacity pump that can pull about 3.5 cubic meters per second whenever its gate is fully opened. On several hot afternoons, meter records tie withdrawals at that volume to the same orchard for forty-minute stretches. The canal level then falls sharply, downstream turnouts take in air, and young trees at three other farms are left without their expected watering window. Total daily demand remains within the district’s seasonal supply; the damaging episodes depend on how quickly this known operator removes water, not merely on the day’s cumulative volume.","scenario_title":"Upstream Orchard Drawdown","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Shifts from digital workloads to canal hydraulics, using turnouts, pumps, flow measurements, and orchards while avoiding the archetype name and predicate wording."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A036__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Agricultural irrigation canal","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"ext001_rate_limiting_a01","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement identifies measurements and a structural cause but offers no repair, operational change, allocation policy, or recommended intervention.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_rate_limiting_a01","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Certified fixed openings physically keep every identified farm at or below 1.0 cubic meter per second, beneath the 1.2-cubic-meter-per-second safe and equitable ceiling, including under maximum pumping."}],"scenario_text":"A cooperative canal supplies orchards along a dry valley during the six-week fruit-sizing season. Every farm uses a numbered, metered turnout linked to its registered operator. After downstream growers reported missed watering windows, technicians tested all turnouts under maximum pump suction. Certified fixed openings physically cap each farm at 1.0 cubic meter per second, below the district’s 1.2-cubic-meter-per-second safe and equitable ceiling. Archived telemetry confirms that no identified farm has ever drawn above that ceiling, even briefly. Nevertheless, the canal level drops abruptly on hot afternoons, and several downstream intakes begin pulling air. The decline sometimes occurs when the upstream orchard is not pumping at all. A dye inspection instead traces water into a newly opened breach beneath an unregistered, abandoned service crossing; the escaping flow has no customer turnout, meter identity, or operating account. Daily farm demand remains within the seasonal allocation, but the unexplained loss is large enough to deprive downstream trees during critical watering periods.","scenario_title":"Canal Loss Without Excess Farm Withdrawal","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer setting and comparable measurement detail, but uses explicit physical-cap and breach evidence to negate excessive withdrawal by any identifiable operator; no archetype label or copied predicate appears."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A036","schema_version":1}