{"cases":[{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A038__DIRECT","case_type":"DIRECT_POSITIVE","domain":"Hospital clinical laboratory operations","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement reports operating constraints, risks, and remaining dependable services without proposing an intervention or naming the archetype.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_graceful_degradation_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Failed analyzers, delayed supplies, and contamination and timing risks make the complete test menu untenable, while a limited group of urgent assays remains dependable."}],"scenario_text":"A regional hospital laboratory lost three of its five analyzers after a coolant-loop failure during a week of heavy respiratory admissions. A snowstorm has also delayed the next reagent shipment, and nearby hospitals cannot accept transferred specimens overnight. The two working analyzers remain calibrated, but their combined throughput is sufficient only for time-critical emergency and intensive-care assays. When supervisors simulate running the complete test menu, queues extend beyond specimen-stability windows, and frequent assay changeovers raise the likelihood of carryover contamination. Troponin, electrolytes, blood gases, and transfusion compatibility testing continue to produce dependable results at the present urgent-care volume. Outpatient endocrine panels, specialized cultures, and routine monitoring orders are accumulating, however, and trying to process them alongside urgent work would make turnaround times and result quality unpredictable. Hospital administrators need an accurate account of the laboratory’s present operational problem before the morning clinical briefing.","scenario_title":"Overloaded Regional Hospital Laboratory","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Uses concrete clinical laboratory language—analyzers, reagents, specimens, assays, and contamination—without repeating the supplied predicate or using an abstraction label."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A038__TRANSFER","case_type":"TRANSFER_POSITIVE","domain":"Public radio broadcast network","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":null,"remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement describes damaged infrastructure, exhausted reserves, and the broadcasts that remain possible without recommending technical or organizational action.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_graceful_degradation_a01","intended_status":"SATISFIED","scenario_evidence":"Wildfire damage and limited generator fuel prevent dependable operation of the entire broadcast portfolio, although emergency bulletins and one statewide audio feed remain supportable."}],"scenario_text":"A coastal public radio network is operating through a fast-moving wildfire that severed its primary microwave link and cut commercial power to four mountain transmitters. Generator fuel at the affected sites is sufficient for roughly eighteen hours, while smoke has grounded the contractor that normally reaches them. Engineers can still originate one statewide audio feed and insert official evacuation bulletins through an intact satellite path. The usual mix of separate regional programs, live interviews, music channels, traffic data, podcasts, and high-bitrate online streams draws on studio encoders and relay equipment now showing repeated thermal alarms. During two attempts to carry the normal schedule, regional feeds dropped without warning and an emergency bulletin reached one county several minutes late. Keeping only the common broadcast and alert insertions active has remained stable during monitoring. Network leaders must describe the operational predicament for local stations and public-safety partners as the fire approaches additional relay sites.","scenario_title":"Wildfire-Strained Public Radio Network","vocabulary_separation_audit":"The transfer case shifts from medical testing to broadcast infrastructure and uses distinct terms such as microwave links, transmitters, satellite paths, encoders, and audio feeds."},{"alternative_route_blocks":[],"case_id":"E15A038__NEAR_MISS","case_type":"ONE_LITERAL_NEAR_MISS","domain":"Public radio broadcast network","intended_route_id":"B1","omitted_condition_id":"ext001_graceful_degradation_a01","remedy_leakage_audit":"The statement presents verified capacity evidence and a discrepancy requiring explanation, but it offers no remedy, intervention, or archetype terminology.","route_evidence":[{"condition_id":"ext001_graceful_degradation_a01","intended_status":"CONTRADICTED","scenario_evidence":"Endurance tests, redundancy checks, fuel records, and live monitoring establish that every ordinary and emergency service can continue safely and dependably despite the wildfire."}],"scenario_text":"A coastal public radio network is facing a nearby wildfire, and an operations dashboard warns that several mountain transmitters may lose their primary microwave connection. Public-safety partners are asking whether regional programming and digital services are about to become unreliable. However, engineers completed a seventy-two-hour endurance test after the warning appeared. Every regional audio feed, live studio circuit, traffic-data channel, podcast service, online stream, and emergency-alert insertion remained within normal performance limits throughout the test. Each threatened transmitter has an independent satellite relay, verified automatic switching, and documented generator fuel for five days at the measured load. Commercial power is still present, equipment temperatures are normal, and live monitoring shows no dropped feeds or delayed bulletins. The dashboard warning was traced to stale topology information about a relay retired months earlier, not to a failed dependency. Under the current fire conditions, the network has confirmed that its entire usual service portfolio can continue safely and dependably. Leaders still need to explain why the alarming dashboard report conflicts with observed operations.","scenario_title":"False Capacity Alarm at a Radio Network","vocabulary_separation_audit":"Retains the transfer domain and comparable infrastructure detail while using affirmative endurance, redundancy, and monitoring evidence to negate the selected-route condition explicitly."}],"experiment_id":"eoa_inverse_innovation_exp15_route_aware_retrieval40_20260814","sample_id":"E15A038","schema_version":1}