{"judgments":[{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c1","evidence":"The asset register treats the network equipment as a single regulated facility.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c2","evidence":"Teams disagree whether the network is one facility or a collection.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c4","evidence":"Operating permit, ownership, watershed, and maintenance-zone relations produce different groupings.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c5","evidence":"The same map is one facility under one basis, seven under another, and fourteen under another.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b047_a04_c6","evidence":"Overlapping watersheds, pressure zones, circuits, and drainage areas leave accountability ambiguous.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q3FE390499F37","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"All selected-route conditions are established by the scenario.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b063_a06_c1","evidence":"Contractor engineers choose blast design and whether to proceed, affecting downstream hazards.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b063_a06_c3","evidence":"Residents and the town bear much of the damage, inspections, response, and dispute costs.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b063_a06_c4","evidence":"Liability is capped, the deductible is reimbursed, and engineers face no lasting pay or performance consequence.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q4EBD9C7BAFBD","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"The contractor controls risk while its consequences are materially limited and shifted outward.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"ext001_graceful_degradation_a01","evidence":"All services remained within normal limits during testing, with independent relays, automatic switching, fuel, and no observed failures.","status":"CONTRADICTED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15QDFB7BF404869","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"The sole selected literal is contradicted; no alternative routes are supplied.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"CONTRADICTED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b003_a11_alg_t3","evidence":"Earlier findings remain scattered, non-controlling, and absent from mission-control decision tables, so similar disputes recur.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"HR2","evidence":"Interdependent operators repeatedly dispute maneuver, telemetry, safety, fuel, and continuity obligations.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q656C0EF0EAED","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"Prior determinations do not govern later incidents or change operational rules, causing recurring system-level disputes.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"ext001_rate_limiting_a01","evidence":"A known upstream orchard draws about 3.5 m³/s despite a sustainable individual-turnout rate of 1.2 m³/s, depriving downstream farms.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q6CCE04D9DBE2","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"An identifiable operator repeatedly consumes canal water above the stated sustainable individual rate.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c1","evidence":"The audit found suppressed genuine deterioration warnings, contradicting Ortiz's safety claims.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2a","evidence":"Ortiz is visibly tense, reports little sleep, and acts to reduce the audit's implications.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c2b","evidence":"She calls cases unrepresentative, seeks exclusions, blames staff, omits findings, and uses a symbolic refresher while retaining the rules.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b022_a15_c3","evidence":"The protocol is her signature achievement and supports her authority and reputation.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q8A5B055FEAC4","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"The audit conflicts with a role-linked public commitment, followed by discomfort and defensive reduction strategies.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b063_a05_c2","evidence":"The producer immediately calls Mateo arrogant after observing the late entrance.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b063_a05_c3","evidence":"From the auditorium, the producer cannot see the wing, crew channel, or backstage sequence.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b063_a05_c5","evidence":"Headset failure, blocked crossover, uncommunicated change, and unsafe scenery movement constrained Mateo's entry.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15QEFC1BDAD3C99","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"A rapid character judgment is made without access to strong situational constraints.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"HR1","evidence":"No authoritative document covers simultaneous edits, retired-item markers, interrupted exchanges, recovery, or which replica prevails.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q5568C3B33D18","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"The replicated ledger lacks the stated complete operating contract.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b031_a15_c1","evidence":"Hundreds of robots independently choose and yield across shared aisles.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b031_a15_c2","evidence":"Knots and queues arise from local routing and feedback without any centrally scheduled stoppage.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b031_a15_c3","evidence":"Each robot's shortest open path is individually allowed and sensible, yet their aggregation blocks freight.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"b031_a15_c4","evidence":"The status board detects the problem only after it has spread, while episodes lengthen and emergency-lane exposure rises.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15Q8E12C79CA079","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"Locally reasonable robot decisions create an escalating, spreading system-level blockage.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":[],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_assessments":[{"condition_id":"b006_a14_c2","evidence":"Duplicated timings, overloaded free-text notes, unclear final-hold ownership, and overlapping records make changes risky.","status":"SATISFIED"},{"condition_id":"HR1","evidence":"The license ending requires an internal change, while cues, timing, audience results, and emergency interlocks must remain fixed.","status":"SATISFIED"}],"intended_case_valid":true,"label_or_solution_leakage":false,"opaque_case_id":"E15QBA71FDFC4732","realistic_and_self_contained":true,"reason":"The selected route is satisfied, and the difficult-to-understand or verify internals also fully satisfy alternative route B4.","remedy_leakage":false,"satisfied_alternative_route_ids":["B4"],"selected_route_status":"SATISFIED"}]}