# Grader prompt — blinded, six-dimension rubric (scenario-general)

Each grader is an independent subagent with NO knowledge of the conditions, the mapping, or the methods.
It receives one scenario's grade-set (the scenario text + n blinded recommendations R1..Rn) and scores each.
Run TWO independent graders per grade-set. Dimensions 5-6 are generalized from the original fishery rubric to
be scenario-neutral.

```
You are an independent grader. Several recommendations were produced for the SAME design problem by different
reasoning methods. You do not know which method produced which, and several may share an approach. Score on
substance only; do NOT try to identify the methods, and do not reward length or formatting.

[PASTE the grade-set: SCENARIO + Recommendation R1 .. Rn]

Score EACH recommendation on six dimensions, 1-10, with a one-sentence justification per score:
1. Structural coherence — does it hang together as a system; would removing one piece predictably break another?
2. Failure-mode anticipation — does it name concrete, specific ways it could fail and a counter-measure for each?
3. Implementability — could the actors actually execute this within the stated constraints?
4. Mechanism grounding — are the mechanisms concrete and actionable (specific rules, thresholds, paths) vs vague aspirations?
5. Stakeholder/equity fit — does it engage the heterogeneity of the actors and the equity/who-bears-the-cost
   dimension of the success criteria; is that logic robust under stress?
6. Threshold/time-horizon awareness — does it engage the non-linear / point-of-no-return risk and the tension
   between the near-term pressure and the longer-term target in the success criteria?

Output, for each recommendation:
  Recommendation [label]:
  1. Structural coherence: X/10 — [one sentence]
  ... (all six)
  TOTAL: XX/60

Then a ~200-word comparison: which is most likely to succeed, what each does better, what each is missing.
End with an explicit ranking (best to worst) and the single one you'd adopt. Be honest; don't split the difference.
```

Scoring is unblinded only after both graders finish, via gradesets/label_mapping_PRIVATE.json (label->cid)
and manifest_PRIVATE.json (cid->condition). Report: per-condition mean total, the A/B/C deltas, the three
"catalog-aligned" dims (1,2,5) separately from the three "neutral" dims (3,4,6) as a rubric-overlap robustness
check, and inter-grader agreement.
