# c15 — Independent coverage verification

## Operative patterns (identified independently from the catalog)

The problem decomposes into:
- A shared self-renewing pool drawn down by many uncoordinated extractors with private-gain / shared-cost incentives, where an authority can bound use but is influence-prone → **`commons_governance`** (PRIMARY operative pattern).
- A success criterion stated explicitly in distributional terms (cohort-average income AND a hard bottom-quartile subsistence floor; a corrective burden that lands unequally) → **`welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment`** (SECONDARY operative pattern, discharges the distributional success/failure criteria).
- An approaching one-way recruitment-collapse threshold that forbids wait-and-see → **`tipping_point_prevention`** (checked as a THIRD candidate; the design folds this in as an `irreversibility` prime annotation rather than naming the archetype. Checked below for coverage; its core function is largely discharged inside the commons design, with one genuine gap.)

Independent retrieval evidence: `search_archetype` returns `commons_governance` in the top band for the core depletion meta-model; `search_by_facets` surfaces `welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment` as the fused top hit for the distributional + scarce-quota facets, and `tipping_point_prevention` as a top hit for the irreversible-threshold facet. This matches (and independently re-derives) the design's named patterns rather than relying on them.

---

## COVERAGE MAP A — `commons_governance` (13 components)

1. **Shared Resource Boundary** → **instantiated** → "defining the governed unit precisely: this stock, its grounds, the 120 currently active boats, and the downstream processors" — resource, affected users, and outsiders all named.
2. **Access Rule** → **instantiated** → "Freeze the operator roster at those 120 for the duration of the recovery. No new entrants" — closes open access.
3. **Use Quota or Use Limit** → **instantiated** → "total allowable catch roughly a quarter below the current harvest... anchored to an annual stock assessment... not negotiated downward."
4. **Monitoring Signal** → **instantiated** → "annual stock assessment produced by an independent scientist or panel" + per-season allocation tracking + "early-warning signs... cap tightens automatically."
5. **Sanction Rule** → **instantiated** → "graduated and proportional: a first overage draws a warning, then a deduction... then suspension, then removal."
6. **Replenishment Rule** → **instantiated** → "spawning-ground and seasonal closures so the stock has protected windows to reproduce" + the sub-MSY cap itself.
7. **Legitimacy Basis** → **instantiated** → "A council of village delegates co-sets the seasonal details with the regulator... local legitimacy" + rules tied to visible data.
8. **Dispute Resolution Path** → **instantiated** → "A standing appeals panel, chaired independently, handles quota disputes, hardship cases, and sanction challenges."
9. **Adaptation Cadence** → **instantiated** → "Review the whole arrangement every three years, or immediately if a threshold warning fires"; allocation re-set each season off the assessment.
10. **Contribution Rule** → **homolog** → accurate at-landing reporting + a "small levy on landings" capitalizing the shared fund; discharges the "users owe something back" function via reporting+funding rather than labor rotation (appropriate for a biologically-replenishing wild stock).
11. **Funding Pool** → **instantiated** → "a small levy on landings plus a recovery grant or loan" funds the income bridge, buyback, and monitoring.
12. **Exception Process** → **instantiated** → "hardship cases" routed through the appeals panel; hardship/subsistence exceptions tied to the equity floor.
13. **Transparency Record** → **instantiated** → "Publish everything that matters: the assessment, the basis for the catch limit, each boat's allocation, the levy's use, and the sanction record" — the anti-capture disclosure.

Subtotal A: 12 instantiated, 1 homolog, 0 declined, 0 missing.

---

## COVERAGE MAP B — `welfare_analysis_and_distributional_effects_assessment` (12 components)

1. **Affected Party Map** → **instantiated** → 120 boats, 5 villages, downstream processors, and the bottom quartile are all named as affected parties.
2. **Baseline and Counterfactual Frame** → **instantiated** → the no-action collapse path ("four to seven years from a collapse") is the explicit counterfactual against which the cap is justified.
3. **Benefit-Burden Incidence Model** → **instantiated** → "Allocate the reduced catch by recent fishing history, but with a hard subsistence floor... a deliberately larger share routed to the smallest operators" — incidence by group, not flat.
4. **Welfare Metric and Value Weights** → **instantiated** → explicit metric is aggregate cohort income + subsistence-catch floor; weights tilt toward the smallest operators.
5. **Equity Guardrail Set** → **instantiated** → "The bottom quartile must never be allocated less than a defined subsistence catch."
6. **Compensation and Mitigation Pathway** → **instantiated** → "a time-limited income bridge... plus a recovery grant or loan" + "voluntary gear-buyback or alternative-livelihood option."
7. **Uncertainty and Sensitivity Frame** → **homolog** → discharged by the adaptive mechanism: allocation rises/falls with the live assessment and the cap "tightens automatically" on weak early-warning signals, which absorbs estimate uncertainty operationally rather than via a static sensitivity table. (Over-lift guard: a formal value-weight sensitivity exercise would not fit a single integrated operating design.)
8. **Decision Trace and Accountability Record** → **instantiated** → published assessment, catch-limit basis, per-boat allocations, levy use, and sanction log = the accountable, monitorable record.
9. **Participation and Validation Channel** → **instantiated** → village-delegate council co-setting rules + appeals panel = the participation/validation channel.
10. **Temporal Distribution Window** → **instantiated** → explicit years-1–3 transition trough vs. the 10-year recovery horizon; the bridge spans the trough until biomass-driven income returns.
11. **Minimum Floor Constraint** → **instantiated** → the subsistence-catch floor for every boat; directly answers the stated failure criterion.
12. **Priority Group Lens** → **instantiated** → bottom-quartile operators flagged as the protected group (larger share, priority fund access, hardship exceptions).

Subtotal B: 10 instantiated, 2 homolog, 0 declined, 0 missing.

---

## COVERAGE MAP C — `tipping_point_prevention` (11 components) — checked because the irreversible threshold is a live structural facet

1. **Undesirable Transition Definition** → **instantiated** → recruitment-collapse "it may not recover from" named as the regime to avoid.
2. **Early Warning Signal** → **instantiated** → "recovery stalling, sizes still shrinking, recruitment proxies weak."
3. **Threshold Estimate** → **instantiated** → the recruitment-collapse threshold (4–7 yrs out) carried from the assessment.
4. **Intervention Window** → **instantiated** → the design acts now ("With recruitment now four to seven years from a collapse") and front-loads a deeper cut.
5. **Stressor Reduction** → **instantiated** → the ~25% sub-MSY cap and spawning closures directly reduce the dominant stressor (harvest pressure).
6. **Feedback Damping** → **homolog** → the automatic-tightening trigger acts as negative feedback against an accelerating decline; serves the damping function.
7. **Prevention Authority** → **instantiated** → regulator applies an independently-set limit, plus automatic tightening that acts before debate — authority to act before proof.
8. **Resilience Buffer** → **instantiated** → the cap deliberately set below MSY creates net biomass surplus = a recovery/resilience buffer.
9. **Trigger Removal** → **homolog** → freezing the roster removes the open-access entry that re-triggers the extraction race.
10. **Reversibility Check** → **instantiated** → the whole design is premised on the crossing being effectively irreversible, which is exactly why a deeper/faster cut is chosen (reconcile note in working).
11. **Precautionary Action Band** → **instantiated** → "if early-warning signs appear... the cap tightens automatically rather than waiting for a debate" = a precommitted precautionary band.

Subtotal C: 8 instantiated, 2 homolog, 0 declined, 0 missing. The irreversibility structure is fully discharged inside the commons + distributional design even though the design only names it as a prime annotation. No standalone gap.

---

## Anti-signature gate (re-checked independently)

- `commons_governance` AS1 (fully private, no spillover) — NOT tripped (rivalrous open-access stock). AS2 (under-provision of a public good) — NOT tripped (over-extraction). AS3 (central authority can simply allocate, no legitimacy/info/enforcement problem) — NOT tripped; the captured regulator + industry-supplied science is exactly why independent science + participation are needed. AS4 (one-time two-party dispute) — NOT tripped (120 repeated players). KEEP.
- `welfare_analysis` anti-sigs (no heterogeneity; pure technical tradeoff; rights floor already prohibits the tradeoff; only an artifact needed) — none tripped; heterogeneous cohort with a binding subsistence floor is the core case. KEEP.
- `tipping_point_prevention` anti-sigs (transition desirable; gradual/reversible; no credible threshold; only an alarm with no preventive logic) — none tripped; design pairs warning with concrete driver reduction. KEEP.

No anti-signature disqualifies the design.

---

## Tally

- Pattern A `commons_governance`: 12 instantiated / 1 homolog / 0 declined / 0 missing.
- Pattern B `welfare_analysis`: 10 instantiated / 2 homolog / 0 declined / 0 missing.
- Pattern C `tipping_point_prevention`: 8 instantiated / 2 homolog / 0 declined / 0 missing.
- Combined: 30 instantiated / 5 homolog / 0 declined / 0 missing.

Every component of all three independently-identified operative patterns is either instantiated or discharged via a named homolog. No component is left missing, and no over-lift was forced. The design also passes referential integrity (L1) and the anti-signature gate (L2).

VERDICT: PASS

Missing components: none.
