Behavioral Economics & Startup Dynamics

← Back to Domain-Specific Families

Abstractions about decision-making biases and entrepreneurial practice, including cognitive effects like the IKEA effect and ostrich effect, startup methods such as effectuation and innovation accounting, and economic concepts like excludability and human capital.

20 abstractions in this family — domain-specific abstractions that sit near one another in structural-signature space (k-means over structural-signature embeddings). Each is shown with its short description.

• Competing goods — Competing goods are distinct valuable ends whose claims can conflict in a practical choice without one value necessarily reducing to, cancelling, or becoming commensurable with the other.
• Default Effect — Shift the distribution of choices without changing any option by flipping which alternative is preselected as the no-action outcome, because a stack of retention mechanisms makes people disproportionately keep whatever the default is.
• Effectuation — Act under genuine uncertainty by starting from the means in hand and making small affordable-loss commitments with self-selected stakeholders, letting the goal co-evolve from those commitments rather than selecting means to serve a fixed goal.
• Effort Justification — After personally expending meaningful effort to attain or create an outcome, a self-evaluating agent raises that outcome's attributed value to reconcile the cost of the effort with the belief that the pursuit was worthwhile.
• Entrepreneurial Discovery — Explain how markets correct their own disequilibria — alert agents perceive profit gaps that others overlook and are not yet in anyone's search space, act on them, and thereby arbitrage the gaps away, an endogenous error-correction no central planner could replicate.
• Excludability — Classify a good by whether non-payers can feasibly be kept from consuming it, and cross that with rivalry to place it in the four-cell Samuelsonian map — private, club, common-pool, public — each cell carrying its own provision pathology and remedy.
• Founder Blind Spot — The venture pattern where a thesis's originator, holding the authority to reroute disconfirming signals, systematically preserves their prior instead of revising it — because revision is uniquely expensive at the authoring seat.
• Founder-Market Fit — The early-stage designation for how well a founding team brings a chosen market the specific insight, credibility, network, and motivation it demands before a product has proven itself — where motivation is the one non-substitutable component.
• Friction Budgeting — The design discipline of treating interaction cost as an explicit allocation variable rather than a uniform negative — concentrating load-bearing friction where it buys reflection, safety, or consent, and removing dead weight elsewhere, under a bounded user-tolerance budget.
• Human Capital — Treat the knowledge, skills, experience, and health embodied in people as an investable capital stock — with a cost, a discounted return stream, and a depreciation rate — so schooling and health spending become commensurable investments rather than consumption.
• IKEA Effect — The bias in which people value objects they built themselves above identical objects built by others — triggered specifically by successful non-trivial creator-labour, visible only in the creator's own valuation, and gone for third parties.
• Innovation Accounting — The lean-startup practice of measuring an early-stage venture's progress by validated learning — a ledger of leap-of-faith assumptions confirmed versus outstanding — rather than by vanity financial metrics that move with spend without updating belief in the model.
• Landing-Page Test — A lean-startup demand test that publishes a page describing an unbuilt offering as if it existed, then counts costly commitment signals (sign-ups, pre-orders, deposits) from representative traffic against a pre-committed threshold — a necessary-not-sufficient gate that can kill a weak idea but never confirm a strong one.
• Onboarding cliff — Diagnose first-use abandonment as a geometry of two curves — cumulative cost crossing the user's willingness-to-invest before cumulative value crosses willingness-to-stay — separating first-contact complexity from steady-state complexity and naming exactly two levers.
• Ostrich Effect — The pattern in which an agent actively avoids acquiring freely available, decision-relevant information whose expected content is bad news, because the anticipated affective cost of knowing outweighs the benefit of acting — so information acquisition becomes valence-sensitive rather than monotone in decision value.
• Overprocessing Waste — Name the waste of effort, precision, or handling that exceeds what the downstream receiver will use or pay for — relocating the definition of value from the performer to the receiver and making the effort-value gap a measurable target for removal.
• Planned obsolescence — A product strategy that intentionally limits useful life, durability, compatibility, or perceived fashionability to accelerate replacement demand.
• Scarcity heuristic — The scarcity heuristic is the judgment tendency to infer greater value, desirability, or quality from perceived rarity or restricted availability, independently of the object's intrinsic utility.
• Scope Neglect — Explain why elicited valuations stay flat across hundredfold changes in magnitude — the count is replaced by a single affect-laden prototype, so the number is understood but never priced in.
• Surrogation — Explain why a well-designed metric drifts from its purpose even absent any gaming: under load an accountable manager mentally replaces the strategic construct with its measure, treating the number as the thing itself rather than a partial proxy for it.