Skip to content

Market Structure, Surplus & Demand

← Back to Domain-Specific Families

Abstractions about prices, quantities, market power, consumer behavior, and welfare under different competitive structures. They include elasticities and demand curves, producer and consumer surplus, inequality measures, oligopoly and monopsony, bundling, channel conflict, and dynamic adjustment.

22 abstractions in this family — domain-specific abstractions that sit near one another in structural-signature space (k-means over structural-signature embeddings). Each is shown with its short description.

  • Alabama Paradox — The failure of house-monotonicity in Hamilton's largest-remainders apportionment: increasing the total number of seats can shrink a constituency's allocation, because raising the house size reorders the fractional-remainder ranking that deals surplus seats.
  • Apportionment Paradox — Recognize that integer rounding of real-valued quotas makes four fairness axioms — quota, house, population, and new-states monotonicity — jointly unsatisfiable, so choosing an apportionment rule is choosing which guarantee to surrender.
  • Bundling — A seller conditions access to one good on accepting another by offering a combined package, extracting more surplus when component valuations are dispersed and negatively correlated — or leveraging market power in one good to foreclose rivals in a complementary one.
  • Channel Conflict — The distribution failure mode in which a producer's new direct pathway to customers undercuts the margins its own intermediaries depend on, triggering rational retaliation that erodes the expected gain — so a new channel's true worth is gross gain minus incumbent-channel loss.
  • Cobweb Model — The economic model of self-sustaining price-quantity oscillation in markets with a rigid production lag, where producers commit output on today's price and discover it clears at another — tracing a cobweb spiral whose stability follows from the supply-to-demand slope ratio.
  • Consumer Surplus — The aggregate welfare buyers gain by paying a market price below what each would have been willing to pay, measured as the area between the demand curve and the price line — giving voluntary exchange's buyer-side value a monetary magnitude for welfare analysis.
  • Cross Elasticity of Demand — The unit-free ratio of the percentage change in one good's quantity demanded to the percentage change in another good's price — whose sign classifies goods as substitutes, complements, or independent and whose magnitude ranks how tightly they constrain each other's prices.
  • Demand Shaping — The supply-chain practice of applying pricing, promotion, substitution, and channel levers to the consumer side of a capacity mismatch — moving realized demand toward feasible supply rather than scaling supply to meet it — by steering the marginal consumer's selection.
  • Double Marginalization — Explain why a chain of firms each holding pricing power ends up charging more and selling less than a single integrated firm would, because each node adds its markup while ignoring the demand-shrinking externality that markup imposes on the other node's profit base.
  • Engel curve — Read a good's economic character — normal or inferior, necessity or luxury — off the slope and curvature of a single schedule that plots its consumption against household income while holding all prices fixed.
  • Gini Coefficient — Collapse a whole distribution of a resource into one number on a 0-to-1 scale by measuring how far its Lorenz curve bows away from perfect equality.
  • Hotelling's Law — The result that two share-maximizing suppliers competing for uniformly distributed consumers who patronize the nearest provider converge on minimum differentiation — both clustering at the median — a share-maximizing yet welfare-minimizing equilibrium whose predictions shift in signed directions as its base-case assumptions are relaxed.
  • Income Elasticity of Demand — Collapse a good's whole income-demand relationship into one unit-free ratio of percentage change in quantity to percentage change in income, so its sign and position relative to one classify it as inferior, necessity, or luxury.
  • Lerner index — Collapse a firm's market power into one dimensionless number, the markup of price over marginal cost as a fraction of price, L = (P − MC) / P, which under profit maximization also equals the reciprocal of the demand elasticity the firm faces.
  • Lorenz Curve — Read a whole distribution's inequality off a single curve by plotting the cumulative share of a quantity against the cumulative share of its ranked holders, so the sag below the perfect-equality diagonal shows how concentrated it is and whether two distributions can be safely ranked.
  • Market power — Gauge an actor's ability to profitably set price above (or wages below) the competitive level by reading the slope of the downward-sloping residual demand curve it faces, quantified as the price-cost wedge (P − MC)/P.
  • Monopsony power — Gauge a buyer's ability to set the price it pays below the competitive level by the slope of the upward-sloping residual supply curve it faces (finite elasticity ε), which yields a markdown of roughly 1/ε and the double distortion of underpayment plus under-hiring.
  • Oligopoly — A market structure of a few sellers each large enough that its choices visibly move the others, so optimal strategy turns on anticipating rivals' responses — with the outcome swinging between competitive and monopoly-leaning by which equilibrium template (Cournot, Bertrand, Stackelberg, or repeated-game collusion) the market fits.
  • Producer Surplus — The gap between the price a seller receives and its reservation price (marginal cost), aggregated as the area between the market price line and the supply curve — the seller's side of a conserved welfare ledger that any market distortion redistributes or destroys.
  • Social Surplus — Measure a market's total net benefit as the area between the demand and supply curves — consumer plus producer surplus — so a policy's efficiency cost reads off the deadweight-loss triangle of trades the price wedge suppresses, distinct from surplus merely transferred.
  • Supply — Model producer behavior as a whole price-to-quantity schedule rather than a single quantity, upward-sloping because expanding output raises marginal cost, so any disturbance either moves output along the curve (only the good's own price) or shifts the whole curve (everything else).
  • Veblen Effect — The anomaly that, for status goods, demand rises with price rather than falling — because the conspicuous high price is itself the costly signal of the buyer's wealth, so cutting it destroys the signal and drives out the very buyers who constitute the market.