Normative Ethics & Moral Standing

← Back to Domain-Specific Families

Abstractions about the grounds and application of moral norms, spanning normative-ethical doctrines (principle of double effect, moral particularism, norm in philosophy), moral-standing concepts (speciesism, moral authority), and applied or professional ethics (professional ethics, justice tourism, value in ethics).

8 abstractions in this family — domain-specific abstractions that sit near one another in structural-signature space (k-means over structural-signature embeddings). Each is shown with its short description.

• Justice tourism — An ethical tourism approach that seeks locally retained economic benefit, reciprocal host–guest exchange, environmental responsibility and political or historical learning.
• Moral authority — Legitimacy to influence judgment or conduct grounded in perceived ethical principle and integrity rather than formal coercive office.
• Moral particularism — Hold that sound moral judgment does not depend on applying a sufficient stock of invariant moral principles because a consideration's relevance or polarity can change with the other features of the particular case.
• Norm (philosophy) — A prescriptive standard, rule or reason that guides or evaluates action through what ought, may or must be done rather than merely describing what is the case.
• Principle of double effect — An ethical doctrine distinguishing an intended good effect from a foreseen but unintended harmful side effect under conditions of act permissibility, proportionality, and noninstrumentality.
• Professional ethics — A profession-specific system of duties, standards, virtues, conflicts controls, and accountability governing how specialized authority is exercised toward clients, colleagues, institutions, and the public.
• Speciesism — Differential moral consideration or treatment based on species membership, often criticized as an unjustified bias favoring human interests over comparable interests of other animals.
• Value (ethics) — Mark an object, state, trait, relation, or activity as good, bad, worthy, choice-giving, or reason-providing under an ethical evaluative standard, while distinguishing bearers, grounds, and intrinsic from instrumental status.