Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function¶
Score post-stroke motor, sensory, balance, joint-motion, and pain impairment with a standardized ordinal examination totaling up to 226 points.
Core Idea¶
The Fugl–Meyer Assessment is a standardized impairment-level scale developed to quantify post-stroke sensorimotor recovery across five domains. The examiner elicits prescribed performances and observations, assigns bounded ordinal item scores, and sums them into domain and total scores whose change can be interpreted using reliability and responsiveness evidence. The abstraction is therefore identified by a declared carrier, a transformation or constraint over that carrier, and an invariant that tells an analyst whether the named structure is genuinely present.
The load-bearing residual is not the broad topic of stroke rehabilitation. It is the exact Fugl–Meyer content, hierarchy, ordinal scoring, and post-stroke construct coverage.
Scope of Application¶
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function belongs to stroke rehabilitation and is useful where the analyst can specify a person after stroke, a trained examiner, standardized Fugl–Meyer items and scoring rules, domain subscores, and an assessment occasion, then evaluate the named standardized item set and scoring rules are administered to quantify post-stroke impairment, with scores retained by their specified domains. The scope is broad within that domain but bounded by the need for the named standardized item set and scoring rules are administered to quantify post-stroke impairment, with scores retained by their specified domains. This entry describes a clinical outcome measure, not medical advice; trained administration, current instrument documentation, patient consent, and study-specific interpretation remain necessary.
Clarity¶
The abstraction clarifies a crowded vocabulary by making the named standardized item set and scoring rules are administered to quantify post-stroke impairment, with scores retained by their specified domains the center of the account. A claim should name the carrier, the governing operation or relation, the applicable assumptions, and the recognition test. A bare label is insufficient because the name Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function can be used for a formal identity, an implementation, or a neighboring result unless carrier and convention are stated.
Manages Complexity¶
Without the abstraction, an analyst must reason directly over many local details: the carrier roles, admissibility assumptions, competing conventions, derived invariants, boundary cases, and proof or validation obligations specific to Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function. Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function compresses them into the roles in the structural signature. That compression permits comparison across instances without erasing the variables that determine validity. It also exposes which details may be varied safely and which are constitutive.
Abstract Reasoning¶
- Identify the carrier. State what the elements, states, objects, or observations are: a person after stroke, a trained examiner, standardized Fugl–Meyer items and scoring rules, domain subscores, and an assessment occasion. Reject examples whose alleged carrier belongs to a different problem. 2. Lock the constitutive rule. Express the named standardized item set and scoring rules are administered to quantify post-stroke impairment, with scores retained by their specified domains independently of one notation or implementation.
Knowledge Transfer¶
Knowledge transfers strongly among subfields of stroke rehabilitation because they reuse a person after stroke, a trained examiner, standardized Fugl–Meyer items and scoring rules, domain subscores, and an assessment occasion, The examiner elicits prescribed performances and observations, assigns bounded ordinal item scores, and sums them into domain and total scores whose change can be interpreted using reliability and responsiveness evidence., and use the current score sheet and instructions, document assessor and timing, verify item and domain scoring, report missing items, and separate observed change from a clinically important change threshold.
Relationships to Other Abstractions¶
Current abstraction Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function Domain-specific
Parents (1) — more general patterns this builds on
-
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function is a kind of Measurement Prime
The proposed strict upward parent is
prime:measurement.
Hierarchy path (1) — routes to 1 parentless root
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function → Measurement
Neighborhood in Abstraction Space¶
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor function sits in a sparse region of the domain-specific corpus (64th percentile for distinctiveness): few abstractions share its structure, so a faithful description tends to retrieve it precisely.
Family — Unclustered & Miscellaneous (1565 abstractions)
Nearest neighbors
- Item analysis — 0.86
- Achievement test — 0.86
- Stroke count method — 0.86
- Employment testing — 0.85
- Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale — 0.85
Computed from structural-signature embeddings · 2026-09-08